Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism 3/2018

01-05-2018 | Original Article

Monthly oral ibandronate 100 mg is as effective as monthly intravenous ibandronate 1 mg in patients with various pathologies in the MOVEST study

Authors: Hiroshi Hagino, Masako Ito, Junko Hashimoto, Masao Yamamoto, Koichi Endo, Kyoko Katsumata, Yoshihiro Asao, Rumiko Matsumoto, Tetsuo Nakano, Hideki Mizunuma, Toshitaka Nakamura

Published in: Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The non-inferiority of oral ibandronate 100 mg to intravenous (i.v.) ibandronate 1 mg in increasing lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) after 12 months of treatment was demonstrated in the randomized, phase III MOVEST study. We conducted subgroup analyses in the per-protocol set of the study (n = 183 oral ibandronate; n = 189 i.v. ibandronate). In patients with LS BMD T score ≥ –3.0 or < –3.0 at screening, LS BMD gains from baseline were 4.42 and 5.79%, respectively, with oral ibandronate, and 4.60 and 5.83%, respectively, with i.v. ibandronate. LS BMD gains in patients with or without prevalent vertebral fractures were 5.21 and 5.23%, respectively, with oral ibandronate, and 5.01 and 5.49%, respectively, with i.v. ibandronate. In patients aged <75 or ≥75 years, LS BMD gains were 5.46 and 4.51%, respectively, with oral ibandronate, and 5.25 and 5.77%, respectively, with i.v. ibandronate. LS BMD gains in patients with baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels ≥20 or <20 ng/mL were 5.35 and 4.76%, respectively, with oral ibandronate, and 5.05 and 6.57%, respectively, with i.v. ibandronate. Similar results were obtained in patients with or without prior bisphosphonate (BP) treatment, and in those receiving osteoporosis drug treatment other than BPs. In conclusion, oral ibandronate 100 mg demonstrated comparable BMD gains with monthly i.v. ibandronate, and thus shows high utility in the lifestyle and disease conditions associated with osteoporosis in Japanese patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Emkey R, Koltun W, Beusterien K, Seidman L, Kivitz A, Devas V, Masanauskaite D (2005) Patient preference for once-monthly ibandronate versus once-weekly alendronate in a randomized, open-label, cross-over trial: the Boniva Alendronate Trial in Osteoporosis (BALTO). Curr Med Res Opin 21:1895–1903CrossRefPubMed Emkey R, Koltun W, Beusterien K, Seidman L, Kivitz A, Devas V, Masanauskaite D (2005) Patient preference for once-monthly ibandronate versus once-weekly alendronate in a randomized, open-label, cross-over trial: the Boniva Alendronate Trial in Osteoporosis (BALTO). Curr Med Res Opin 21:1895–1903CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hadji P, Minne H, Pfeifer M, Bourgeois P, Fardellone P, Licata A, Devas V, Masanauskaite D, Barrett-Connor E (2008) Treatment preference for monthly oral ibandronate and weekly oral alendronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized, crossover study (BALTO II). Jt Bone Spine 75:303–310CrossRef Hadji P, Minne H, Pfeifer M, Bourgeois P, Fardellone P, Licata A, Devas V, Masanauskaite D, Barrett-Connor E (2008) Treatment preference for monthly oral ibandronate and weekly oral alendronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized, crossover study (BALTO II). Jt Bone Spine 75:303–310CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Reginster JY, Adami S, Lakatos P, Greenwald M, Stepan JJ, Silverman SL, Christiansen C, Rowell L, Mairon N, Bonvoisin B, Drezner MK, Emkey R, Felsenberg D, Cooper C, Delmas PD, Miller PD (2006) Efficacy and tolerability of once-monthly oral ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2 year results from the MOBILE study. Ann Rheum Dis 65:654–661CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reginster JY, Adami S, Lakatos P, Greenwald M, Stepan JJ, Silverman SL, Christiansen C, Rowell L, Mairon N, Bonvoisin B, Drezner MK, Emkey R, Felsenberg D, Cooper C, Delmas PD, Miller PD (2006) Efficacy and tolerability of once-monthly oral ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2 year results from the MOBILE study. Ann Rheum Dis 65:654–661CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Eisman JA, Civitelli R, Adami S, Czerwinski E, Recknor C, Prince R, Reginster JY, Zaidi M, Felsenberg D, Hughes C, Mairon N, Masanauskaite D, Reid DM, Delmas PD, Recker RR (2008) Efficacy and tolerability of intravenous ibandronate injections in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2-year results from the DIVA study. J Rheumatol 35:488–497PubMed Eisman JA, Civitelli R, Adami S, Czerwinski E, Recknor C, Prince R, Reginster JY, Zaidi M, Felsenberg D, Hughes C, Mairon N, Masanauskaite D, Reid DM, Delmas PD, Recker RR (2008) Efficacy and tolerability of intravenous ibandronate injections in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2-year results from the DIVA study. J Rheumatol 35:488–497PubMed
5.
go back to reference Miller PD, Recker RR, Reginster JY, Riis BJ, Czerwinski E, Masanauskaite D, Kenwright A, Lorenc R, Stakkestad JA, Lakatos P (2012) Efficacy of monthly oral ibandronate is sustained over 5 years: the MOBILE long-term extension study. Osteoporos Int 23:1747–1756CrossRefPubMed Miller PD, Recker RR, Reginster JY, Riis BJ, Czerwinski E, Masanauskaite D, Kenwright A, Lorenc R, Stakkestad JA, Lakatos P (2012) Efficacy of monthly oral ibandronate is sustained over 5 years: the MOBILE long-term extension study. Osteoporos Int 23:1747–1756CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bianchi G, Czerwinski E, Kenwright A, Burdeska A, Recker RR, Felsenberg D (2012) Long-term administration of quarterly IV ibandronate is effective and well tolerated in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 5-year data from the DIVA study long-term extension. Osteoporos Int 23:1769–1778CrossRefPubMed Bianchi G, Czerwinski E, Kenwright A, Burdeska A, Recker RR, Felsenberg D (2012) Long-term administration of quarterly IV ibandronate is effective and well tolerated in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 5-year data from the DIVA study long-term extension. Osteoporos Int 23:1769–1778CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Harris ST, Blumentals WA, Miller PD (2008) Ibandronate and the risk of non-vertebral and clinical fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: results of a meta-analysis of phase III studies. Curr Med Res Opin 24:237–245CrossRefPubMed Harris ST, Blumentals WA, Miller PD (2008) Ibandronate and the risk of non-vertebral and clinical fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: results of a meta-analysis of phase III studies. Curr Med Res Opin 24:237–245CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cranney A, Wells GA, Yetisir E, Adami S, Cooper C, Delmas PD, Miller PD, Papapoulos S, Reginster JY, Sambrook PN, Silverman S, Siris E, Adachi JD (2009) Ibandronate for the prevention of nonvertebral fractures: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Osteoporos Int 20:291–297CrossRefPubMed Cranney A, Wells GA, Yetisir E, Adami S, Cooper C, Delmas PD, Miller PD, Papapoulos S, Reginster JY, Sambrook PN, Silverman S, Siris E, Adachi JD (2009) Ibandronate for the prevention of nonvertebral fractures: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Osteoporos Int 20:291–297CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Miller PD, Recker RR, Harris S, Silverman S, Felsenberg D, Reginster J, Day DM, Barr C, Masanauskaite D (2014) Long-term fracture rates seen with continued ibandronate treatment: pooled analysis of DIVA and MOBILE long-term extension studies. Osteoporos Int 25:349–357CrossRefPubMed Miller PD, Recker RR, Harris S, Silverman S, Felsenberg D, Reginster J, Day DM, Barr C, Masanauskaite D (2014) Long-term fracture rates seen with continued ibandronate treatment: pooled analysis of DIVA and MOBILE long-term extension studies. Osteoporos Int 25:349–357CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nakamura T, Nakano T, Ito M, Hagino H, Hashimoto J, Tobinai M, Mizunuma H, MOVER Study Group (2013) Clinical efficacy on fracture risk and safety of 0.5 mg or 1 mg/month intravenous ibandronate versus 2.5 mg/day oral risedronate in patients with primary osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 93:137–146CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nakamura T, Nakano T, Ito M, Hagino H, Hashimoto J, Tobinai M, Mizunuma H, MOVER Study Group (2013) Clinical efficacy on fracture risk and safety of 0.5 mg or 1 mg/month intravenous ibandronate versus 2.5 mg/day oral risedronate in patients with primary osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 93:137–146CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Hagino H, Yoshida S, Hashimoto J, Matsunaga M, Tobinai M, Nakamura T (2014) Increased bone mineral density with monthly intravenous ibandronate contributes to fracture risk reduction in patients with primary osteoporosis: three-year analysis of the MOVER study. Calcif Tissue Int 95:557–563CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hagino H, Yoshida S, Hashimoto J, Matsunaga M, Tobinai M, Nakamura T (2014) Increased bone mineral density with monthly intravenous ibandronate contributes to fracture risk reduction in patients with primary osteoporosis: three-year analysis of the MOVER study. Calcif Tissue Int 95:557–563CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Ito M, Tobinai M, Yoshida S, Hashimoto J, Nakamura T (2017) Effect of monthly intravenous ibandronate injections on vertebral or non-vertebral fracture risk in Japanese patients with high-risk osteoporosis in the MOVER study. J Bone Miner Metab 35:58–64CrossRefPubMed Ito M, Tobinai M, Yoshida S, Hashimoto J, Nakamura T (2017) Effect of monthly intravenous ibandronate injections on vertebral or non-vertebral fracture risk in Japanese patients with high-risk osteoporosis in the MOVER study. J Bone Miner Metab 35:58–64CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Nakamura T, Ito M, Hashimoto J, Shinomiya K, Asao Y, Katsumata K, Hagino H, Inoue T, Nakano T, Mizunuma H, MOVEST Study Group (2015) Clinical efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate 100 mg versus monthly intravenous ibandronate 1 mg in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 26:2685–2693CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nakamura T, Ito M, Hashimoto J, Shinomiya K, Asao Y, Katsumata K, Hagino H, Inoue T, Nakano T, Mizunuma H, MOVEST Study Group (2015) Clinical efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate 100 mg versus monthly intravenous ibandronate 1 mg in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 26:2685–2693CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Okazaki R (2016) Vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency: its clinical significance and treatment. Clin Calcium 26:251–258PubMed Okazaki R (2016) Vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency: its clinical significance and treatment. Clin Calcium 26:251–258PubMed
15.
go back to reference Sebba AI, Emkey RD, Kohles JD, Sambrook PN (2009) Ibandronate dose response is associated with increases in bone mineral density and reductions in clinical fractures: results of a meta-analysis. Bone 44:423–427CrossRefPubMed Sebba AI, Emkey RD, Kohles JD, Sambrook PN (2009) Ibandronate dose response is associated with increases in bone mineral density and reductions in clinical fractures: results of a meta-analysis. Bone 44:423–427CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Miller PD, Delmas PD, Huss H, Patel KM, Schimmer RC, Adami S, Recker RR (2010) Increases in hip and spine bone mineral density are predictive for vertebral antifracture efficacy with ibandronate. Calcif Tissue Int 87:305–313CrossRefPubMed Miller PD, Delmas PD, Huss H, Patel KM, Schimmer RC, Adami S, Recker RR (2010) Increases in hip and spine bone mineral density are predictive for vertebral antifracture efficacy with ibandronate. Calcif Tissue Int 87:305–313CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Nakai K, Tobinai M, Hashimoto J, Iida S, Kawanishi T (2016) The optimal oral dose selection of ibandronate in Japanese patients with osteoporosis based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 41:139–147CrossRefPubMed Nakai K, Tobinai M, Hashimoto J, Iida S, Kawanishi T (2016) The optimal oral dose selection of ibandronate in Japanese patients with osteoporosis based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 41:139–147CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Orimo H, Hayashi Y, Fukunaga M, Sone T, Fujiwara S, Shiraki M, Kushida K, Miyamoto S, Soen S, Nishimura J, Oh-Hashi Y, Hosoi T, Gorai I, Tanaka H, Igai T, Kishimoto H, Osteoporosis Diagnostic Criteria Review Committee: Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research (2001) Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision. J Bone Miner Metab 19:331–337CrossRefPubMed Orimo H, Hayashi Y, Fukunaga M, Sone T, Fujiwara S, Shiraki M, Kushida K, Miyamoto S, Soen S, Nishimura J, Oh-Hashi Y, Hosoi T, Gorai I, Tanaka H, Igai T, Kishimoto H, Osteoporosis Diagnostic Criteria Review Committee: Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research (2001) Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision. J Bone Miner Metab 19:331–337CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Orimo H, Yaegashi Y, Hosoi T, Fukushima Y, Onoda T, Hashimoto T, Sakata K (2016) Hip fracture incidence in Japan: estimates of new patients in 2012 and 25-year trends. Osteoporos Int 27:1777–1784CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Orimo H, Yaegashi Y, Hosoi T, Fukushima Y, Onoda T, Hashimoto T, Sakata K (2016) Hip fracture incidence in Japan: estimates of new patients in 2012 and 25-year trends. Osteoporos Int 27:1777–1784CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Nakano T, Yamamoto M, Hashimoto J, Tobinai M, Yoshida S, Nakamura T (2016) Higher response with bone mineral density increase with monthly injectable ibandronate 1 mg compared with oral risedronate in the MOVER study. J Bone Miner Metab 34:678–684CrossRefPubMed Nakano T, Yamamoto M, Hashimoto J, Tobinai M, Yoshida S, Nakamura T (2016) Higher response with bone mineral density increase with monthly injectable ibandronate 1 mg compared with oral risedronate in the MOVER study. J Bone Miner Metab 34:678–684CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Carmel AS, Shieh A, Bang H, Bockman RS (2012) The 25(OH)D level needed to maintain a favorable bisphosphonate response is ≥33 ng/ml. Osteoporos Int 23:2479–2487CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carmel AS, Shieh A, Bang H, Bockman RS (2012) The 25(OH)D level needed to maintain a favorable bisphosphonate response is ≥33 ng/ml. Osteoporos Int 23:2479–2487CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Ishijima M, Sakamoto Y, Yamanaka M, Tokita A, Kitahara K, Kaneko H, Kurosawa H (2009) Minimum required vitamin D level for optimal increase in bone mineral density with alendronate treatment in osteoporotic women. Calcif Tissue Int 85:398–404CrossRefPubMed Ishijima M, Sakamoto Y, Yamanaka M, Tokita A, Kitahara K, Kaneko H, Kurosawa H (2009) Minimum required vitamin D level for optimal increase in bone mineral density with alendronate treatment in osteoporotic women. Calcif Tissue Int 85:398–404CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Monthly oral ibandronate 100 mg is as effective as monthly intravenous ibandronate 1 mg in patients with various pathologies in the MOVEST study
Authors
Hiroshi Hagino
Masako Ito
Junko Hashimoto
Masao Yamamoto
Koichi Endo
Kyoko Katsumata
Yoshihiro Asao
Rumiko Matsumoto
Tetsuo Nakano
Hideki Mizunuma
Toshitaka Nakamura
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0914-8779
Electronic ISSN: 1435-5604
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-017-0839-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism 3/2018 Go to the issue