Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics 2/2016

Open Access 01-04-2016 | Original Paper

The optimal oral dose selection of ibandronate in Japanese patients with osteoporosis based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties

Authors: Kiyohiko Nakai, Masato Tobinai, Junko Hashimoto, Satofumi Iida, Takehiko Kawanishi

Published in: European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Ibandronate is a drug widely used outside Japan for the treatment of osteoporosis. It is available in formulations for intermittent intravenous (i.v.) administration and for intermittent (once monthly) oral administration. Ibandronate was recently approved in Japan as an i.v. injection with a dosing regimen of 1.0 mg once a month. To establish the optimal dose for oral administration of ibandronate in Japanese osteoporotic patients, we investigated the pharmacokinetics of and pharmacodynamic response to ibandronate following oral and intravenous administrations to Japanese subjects. Ibandronate (20, 50, 100, or 150 mg) was given orally to healthy postmenopausal Japanese women and to Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis. Serial measurements were obtained for the concentrations of serum ibandronate and urinary cross-linked C-telopeptide of Type I collagen (uCTX). Pharmacokinetic parameters and the time profiles of creatinine-corrected uCTX were compared with those obtained from postmenopausal Japanese women with osteopenia after administration of 1.0 mg i.v. ibandronate. Following oral administration of ibandronate, the area under the serum ibandronate concentration–time curve (AUCinf) increased dose-proportionally for doses up to 100 mg; at 150 mg, AUCinf increased beyond the dose-proportionality seen with doses up to 100 mg. The AUCinf within the linear range following administration of 100 mg oral ibandronate was similar to that following 1.0 mg i.v. ibandronate. Additionally, corrected uCTX decreased after administration of 100 mg oral ibandronate and remained decreased for 1 month; the magnitude of the decrease was similar to or greater than that obtained after 1.0 mg i.v. ibandronate. From a clinical pharmacological perspective, administration of 100 mg/month oral ibandronate was equivalent to that of 1.0 mg/month i.v. ibandronate.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Barrett J, Worth E, Bauss F, Epstein S (2004) Ibandronate: a clinical pharmacological and pharmacokinetic update. J Clin Pharmacol 44:951–965CrossRefPubMed Barrett J, Worth E, Bauss F, Epstein S (2004) Ibandronate: a clinical pharmacological and pharmacokinetic update. J Clin Pharmacol 44:951–965CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Dunford JE, Thompson K, Coxon FP, Luckman SP, Hahn FM, Poulter CD, Ebetino FH, Rogers MJ (2001) Structure–activity relationships for inhibition of farnesyl diphosphate synthase in vitro and inhibition of bone resorption in vivo by nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 296:235–242PubMed Dunford JE, Thompson K, Coxon FP, Luckman SP, Hahn FM, Poulter CD, Ebetino FH, Rogers MJ (2001) Structure–activity relationships for inhibition of farnesyl diphosphate synthase in vitro and inhibition of bone resorption in vivo by nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 296:235–242PubMed
go back to reference Endele R, Loew H, Bauss F (2005) Analytical methods for the quantification of ibandronate in body fluids and bone. J Pharm Biomed Anal 39:246–256CrossRefPubMed Endele R, Loew H, Bauss F (2005) Analytical methods for the quantification of ibandronate in body fluids and bone. J Pharm Biomed Anal 39:246–256CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gieschke R, Hayashi N, Vis P, Jacqmin P (2003) Modelling the effects of ibandronate treatment on the time course of bone mineral density in osteoporotic postmenopausal women. In: 30th European Symposium on Calcified Tissues (ESCT), Rome, Italy Gieschke R, Hayashi N, Vis P, Jacqmin P (2003) Modelling the effects of ibandronate treatment on the time course of bone mineral density in osteoporotic postmenopausal women. In: 30th European Symposium on Calcified Tissues (ESCT), Rome, Italy
go back to reference Nakamura T, Mizunuma H, Itabashi A, Yamane H, Hannita T, Karube M, Takeuchi K, Ikegami R, Okamoto S, Hasunuma T, Kumagai Y (2007) Monthly oral ibandronate is well tolerated and efficacious in Japanese osteoporotic subjects. J Bone Miner Res 22(Suppl 1):S333 Nakamura T, Mizunuma H, Itabashi A, Yamane H, Hannita T, Karube M, Takeuchi K, Ikegami R, Okamoto S, Hasunuma T, Kumagai Y (2007) Monthly oral ibandronate is well tolerated and efficacious in Japanese osteoporotic subjects. J Bone Miner Res 22(Suppl 1):S333
go back to reference Nakamura T, Nakano T, Ito M, Hagino H, Hashimoto J, Tobinai M, Mizunuma H, MOVER Study Group (2013) Clinical efficacy on fracture risk and safety of 0.5 mg or 1 mg/month intravenous ibandronate versus 2.5 mg/day oral risedronate in patients with primary osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 93:137–146CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nakamura T, Nakano T, Ito M, Hagino H, Hashimoto J, Tobinai M, Mizunuma H, MOVER Study Group (2013) Clinical efficacy on fracture risk and safety of 0.5 mg or 1 mg/month intravenous ibandronate versus 2.5 mg/day oral risedronate in patients with primary osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 93:137–146CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Ogura Y, Gonsho A, Cyong JC, Orimo H (2004) Clinical trial of risedronate in Japanese volunteers: single and multiple oral dose studies. J Bone Miner Metab 22:111–119CrossRefPubMed Ogura Y, Gonsho A, Cyong JC, Orimo H (2004) Clinical trial of risedronate in Japanese volunteers: single and multiple oral dose studies. J Bone Miner Metab 22:111–119CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pillai G, Gieschke R, Goggin T, Jacqmin P, Schimmer RC, Steimer JL (2004) A semimechanistic and mechanistic population PK–PD model for biomarker response to ibandronate, a new bisphosphonate for the treatment of osteoporosis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 58:618–631CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pillai G, Gieschke R, Goggin T, Jacqmin P, Schimmer RC, Steimer JL (2004) A semimechanistic and mechanistic population PK–PD model for biomarker response to ibandronate, a new bisphosphonate for the treatment of osteoporosis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 58:618–631CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Pillai G, Gieschke R, Goggin T, Barrett J, Worth E, Steimer JL (2006) Population pharmacokinetics of ibandronate in Caucasian and Japanese healthy males and postmenopausal females. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 44:655–667CrossRefPubMed Pillai G, Gieschke R, Goggin T, Barrett J, Worth E, Steimer JL (2006) Population pharmacokinetics of ibandronate in Caucasian and Japanese healthy males and postmenopausal females. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 44:655–667CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Reginster JY, Gieschke R (2006) Clinical utility of a pharmacostatistical model for ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Curr Drug Metab 7:827–836CrossRefPubMed Reginster JY, Gieschke R (2006) Clinical utility of a pharmacostatistical model for ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Curr Drug Metab 7:827–836CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The optimal oral dose selection of ibandronate in Japanese patients with osteoporosis based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties
Authors
Kiyohiko Nakai
Masato Tobinai
Junko Hashimoto
Satofumi Iida
Takehiko Kawanishi
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0378-7966
Electronic ISSN: 2107-0180
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-014-0242-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics 2/2016 Go to the issue