Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 3/2019

Open Access 01-03-2019 | Computed Tomography | Original Article - Neurosurgery general

Classification of bone flap resorption after cranioplasty: a proposal for a computed tomography-based scoring system

Authors: Tommi K. Korhonen, Niina Salokorpi, Pasi Ohtonen, Petri Lehenkari, Willy Serlo, Jaakko Niinimäki, Sami Tetri

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Bone flap resorption (BFR) is the most prevalent complication resulting in autologous cranioplasty failure, but no consensus on the definition of BFR or between the radiological signs and relevance of BFR has been established. We set out to develop an easy-to-use scoring system intended to standardize the interpretation of radiological BFR findings.

Methods

All 45 autologous cranioplasty patients operated on at Oulu University Hospital from 2004 to 2014 were identified, and the bone flap status of all the available patients was evaluated using the new scoring system. Derived from previous literature, a three-variable score for the detection of BFR changes is proposed. The variables “Extent” (estimated remaining bone volume), “Severity” (possible perforations and their measured diameter), and “Focus” (the number of BFR foci within the flap) are scored from 0 to 3 individually. Using the sum of these scores, a score of 0–9 is assigned to describe the degree of BFR. Additionally, independent neurosurgeons assessed the presence and relevance of BFR from the same data set. These assessments were compared to the BFR scores in order to find a score limit for relevant BFR.

Results

BFR was considered relevant by the neurosurgeons in 11 (26.8%) cases. The agreement on the relevance of BFR demonstrated substantial strength (κ 0.64, 95%CI 0.36 to 0.91). The minimum resorption score in cases of relevant BFR was 5. Thus, BFR with a resorption score ≥ 5 was defined relevant (grades II and III). With this definition, grade II or III BFR was found in 15 (36.6%) of our patients. No risk factors were found to predict relevant BFR.

Conclusions

The score was proven to be easy to use and we recommend that only cases with grades II and III BFR undergo neurosurgical consultation. However, general applicability can only be claimed after validation in independent cohorts.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Dujovny M, Aviles A, Agner C, Fernandez P, Charbel FT (1997) Cranioplasty: cosmetic or therapeutic? Surg Neurol 47:238–241CrossRefPubMed Dujovny M, Aviles A, Agner C, Fernandez P, Charbel FT (1997) Cranioplasty: cosmetic or therapeutic? Surg Neurol 47:238–241CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Dünisch P, Walter J, Sakr Y, Kalff R, Waschke A, Ewald C (2013) Risk factors of aseptic bone resorption: a study after autologous bone flap reinsertion due to decompressive craniotomy. J Neurosurg 118:1141–1147CrossRefPubMed Dünisch P, Walter J, Sakr Y, Kalff R, Waschke A, Ewald C (2013) Risk factors of aseptic bone resorption: a study after autologous bone flap reinsertion due to decompressive craniotomy. J Neurosurg 118:1141–1147CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ernst G, Qeadan F, Carlson AP (2018) Subcutaneous bone flap storage after emergency craniectomy: cost-effectiveness and rate of resorption. J Neurosurg 129:1604–1610 Ernst G, Qeadan F, Carlson AP (2018) Subcutaneous bone flap storage after emergency craniectomy: cost-effectiveness and rate of resorption. J Neurosurg 129:1604–1610
6.
go back to reference Honeybul S, Ho KM (2013) The current role of decompressive craniectomy in the management of neurological emergencies. Brain Inj 27:979–991CrossRefPubMed Honeybul S, Ho KM (2013) The current role of decompressive craniectomy in the management of neurological emergencies. Brain Inj 27:979–991CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174 Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174
15.
go back to reference Moreira-Gonzalez A, Jackson IT, Miyawaki T, Barakat K, DiNick V (2003) Clinical outcome in cranioplasty: critical review in long-term follow-up. J Craniofac Surg 14:144–153 Moreira-Gonzalez A, Jackson IT, Miyawaki T, Barakat K, DiNick V (2003) Clinical outcome in cranioplasty: critical review in long-term follow-up. J Craniofac Surg 14:144–153
16.
go back to reference Prolo DJ, Burres KP, McLaughlin WT, Christensen AH (1979) Autogenous skull cranioplasty: fresh and preserved (frozen), with consideration of the cellular response. Neurosurgery 4:18–29 Prolo DJ, Burres KP, McLaughlin WT, Christensen AH (1979) Autogenous skull cranioplasty: fresh and preserved (frozen), with consideration of the cellular response. Neurosurgery 4:18–29
19.
go back to reference Schuss P, Vatter H, Oszvald A, Marquardt G, Imöhl L, Seifert V, Güresir E (2013) Bone flap resorption: risk factors for the development of a long-term complication following cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy. J Neurotrauma. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2012.2542 Schuss P, Vatter H, Oszvald A, Marquardt G, Imöhl L, Seifert V, Güresir E (2013) Bone flap resorption: risk factors for the development of a long-term complication following cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy. J Neurotrauma. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1089/​neu.​2012.​2542
20.
go back to reference Schwarz F, Dünisch P, Walter J, Sakr Y, Kalff R, Ewald C (2016) Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: is there a rationale for an initial artificial bone-substitute implant? A single-center experience after 631 procedures. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.4.JNS159 Schwarz F, Dünisch P, Walter J, Sakr Y, Kalff R, Ewald C (2016) Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: is there a rationale for an initial artificial bone-substitute implant? A single-center experience after 631 procedures. J Neurosurg. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3171/​2015.​4.​JNS159
Metadata
Title
Classification of bone flap resorption after cranioplasty: a proposal for a computed tomography-based scoring system
Authors
Tommi K. Korhonen
Niina Salokorpi
Pasi Ohtonen
Petri Lehenkari
Willy Serlo
Jaakko Niinimäki
Sami Tetri
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-03791-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Acta Neurochirurgica 3/2019 Go to the issue

Original Article - Brain Tumors

Influence of pregnancy on glioma patients