Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Diabetologica 12/2017

01-12-2017 | Original Article

Predictors of response to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Authors: Matteo Monami, Ilaria Dicembrini, Besmir Nreu, Francesco Andreozzi, Giorgio Sesti, Edoardo Mannucci

Published in: Acta Diabetologica | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims

The aim of the present meta-analysis is the identification of the characteristics of patients, which predict the efficacy on HbA1c of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA).

Methods

A Medline and Embase search for “exenatide” OR “liraglutide” OR “albiglutide” OR “dulaglutide” OR “lixisenatide” was performed, collecting randomized clinical trials (duration > 12 weeks) up to September 2016, comparing GLP-1 RA at the maximal approved dose with placebo or active drugs. Furthermore, unpublished studies were searched in the www.​clinicaltrials.​gov register. For meta-analyses, the outcome considered were 24- and 52-week HbA1c. Separate analyses were performed, whenever possible, for subgroups of trials based on several inclusion criteria. In addition, meta-regression analyses were performed for comparisons for which 10 or more trails were available.

Results

A total of 92 trials fulfilling the inclusion criteria were identified. In placebo-controlled trials (n = 41), the 24-week mean reduction of HbA1c with GLP-1 RA was − 0.75 [− 0.87; − 0.63]%. Shorter-acting molecules appear to be more effective in patients with lower fasting glucose, whereas longer-acting agents in patients with higher fasting hyperglycaemia. Obesity and duration of diabetes do not seem to moderate the efficacy of GLP-1 RA, whereas in non-Caucasians and older patients liraglutide could be less effective. At 52 weeks, only 9 placebo-controlled trials were available for preventing any reliable analyses.

Conclusions

Using a variety of approaches (meta-analyses of subgroup of trials, meta-regression, systematic review of subgroup analyses in individual trials, and meta-analyses of subgroups of patients), we identified some putative predictors of efficacy of GLP-1 RA, which deserve further investigation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB et al (2012) Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 35:1364–1379CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB et al (2012) Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 35:1364–1379CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee, Harper W, Clement M et al (2013) Pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes. Can J Diabetes 37(Suppl 1):S61–S68 Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee, Harper W, Clement M et al (2013) Pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes. Can J Diabetes 37(Suppl 1):S61–S68
3.
go back to reference Monami M, Lamanna C, Marchionni N, Mannucci E (2008) Comparison of different drugs as add-on treatments to metformin in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 79:196–203CrossRefPubMed Monami M, Lamanna C, Marchionni N, Mannucci E (2008) Comparison of different drugs as add-on treatments to metformin in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 79:196–203CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Liu SC, Tu YK, Chien MN, Chien KL (2012) Effect of antidiabetic agents added to metformin on glycaemic control, hypoglycaemia and weight change in patients with type 2 diabetes: a network meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 14:810–820CrossRefPubMed Liu SC, Tu YK, Chien MN, Chien KL (2012) Effect of antidiabetic agents added to metformin on glycaemic control, hypoglycaemia and weight change in patients with type 2 diabetes: a network meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 14:810–820CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mannino GC, Sesti G (2012) Individualized therapy for type 2 diabetes: clinical implications of pharmacogenetic data. Mol Diagn Ther 16:285–302CrossRefPubMed Mannino GC, Sesti G (2012) Individualized therapy for type 2 diabetes: clinical implications of pharmacogenetic data. Mol Diagn Ther 16:285–302CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guideline Expert Committe (2003) Canadian Diabetes Association 2003 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Can J Diabetes 2003:S1–S152 Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guideline Expert Committe (2003) Canadian Diabetes Association 2003 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Can J Diabetes 2003:S1–S152
9.
go back to reference National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions (UK) (2008) Type 2 diabetes: National Clinical Guideline for Management in Primary and Secondary Care (update). Royal College of Physicians, London National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions (UK) (2008) Type 2 diabetes: National Clinical Guideline for Management in Primary and Secondary Care (update). Royal College of Physicians, London
10.
go back to reference Rodbard HW, Blonde L, Braithwaite SS et al (2007) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the management of diabetes mellitus. Endocr Pract. 1:1–68CrossRef Rodbard HW, Blonde L, Braithwaite SS et al (2007) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the management of diabetes mellitus. Endocr Pract. 1:1–68CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–269CrossRefPubMed Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–269CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12CrossRefPubMed Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50:1088–1101CrossRefPubMed Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50:1088–1101CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Jaiswal M, Martin CL, Brown MB et al (2015) Effects of exenatide on measures of diabetic neuropathy in subjects with type 2 diabetes: results from an 18-month proof-of-concept open-label randomized study. J Diabetes Complic 29:1287–1294CrossRef Jaiswal M, Martin CL, Brown MB et al (2015) Effects of exenatide on measures of diabetic neuropathy in subjects with type 2 diabetes: results from an 18-month proof-of-concept open-label randomized study. J Diabetes Complic 29:1287–1294CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gallwitz B, Böhmer M, Segiet T et al (2011) Exenatide twice daily versus premixed insulin aspart 70/30 in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care 34:604–606CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gallwitz B, Böhmer M, Segiet T et al (2011) Exenatide twice daily versus premixed insulin aspart 70/30 in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care 34:604–606CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Buse JB, Bergenstal RM, Glass LC et al (2011) Use of twice-daily exenatide in Basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 154(2):103–112CrossRefPubMed Buse JB, Bergenstal RM, Glass LC et al (2011) Use of twice-daily exenatide in Basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 154(2):103–112CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Buse JB, Henry RR, Han J et al (2004) Effects of exenatide (exendin-4) on glycemic control over 30 weeks in sulfonylurea-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 27(11):2628–2635CrossRefPubMed Buse JB, Henry RR, Han J et al (2004) Effects of exenatide (exendin-4) on glycemic control over 30 weeks in sulfonylurea-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 27(11):2628–2635CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bergenstal RM, Wysham C, Macconell L et al (2010) Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial. Lancet 376(9739):431–439CrossRefPubMed Bergenstal RM, Wysham C, Macconell L et al (2010) Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial. Lancet 376(9739):431–439CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Frías JP, Guja C, Hardy E et al (2016) Exenatide once weekly plus dapagliflozin once daily versus exenatide or dapagliflozin alone in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy (DURATION-8): a 28 week, multicentre, double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 4:1004–1016CrossRefPubMed Frías JP, Guja C, Hardy E et al (2016) Exenatide once weekly plus dapagliflozin once daily versus exenatide or dapagliflozin alone in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy (DURATION-8): a 28 week, multicentre, double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 4:1004–1016CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Pinget M, Goldenberg R, Niemoeller E, Muehlen-Bartmer I, Guo H, Aronson R (2013) Efficacy and safety of lixisenatide once daily versus placebo in type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled on pioglitazone (GetGoal-P). Diabetes Obes Metab 15:1000–1007CrossRefPubMed Pinget M, Goldenberg R, Niemoeller E, Muehlen-Bartmer I, Guo H, Aronson R (2013) Efficacy and safety of lixisenatide once daily versus placebo in type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled on pioglitazone (GetGoal-P). Diabetes Obes Metab 15:1000–1007CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Marre M, Shaw J, Brändle M et al (2009) Liraglutide, a once-daily human GLP-1 analogue, added to a sulphonylurea over 26 weeks produces greater improvements in glycaemic and weight control compared with adding rosiglitazone or placebo in subjects with type 2 diabetes (LEAD-1 SU). Diabet Med 26(3):268–278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Marre M, Shaw J, Brändle M et al (2009) Liraglutide, a once-daily human GLP-1 analogue, added to a sulphonylurea over 26 weeks produces greater improvements in glycaemic and weight control compared with adding rosiglitazone or placebo in subjects with type 2 diabetes (LEAD-1 SU). Diabet Med 26(3):268–278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Russell-Jones D, Vaag A, Schmitz O et al (2009) Liraglutide vs insulin glargine and placebo in combination with metformin and sulfonylurea therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (LEAD-5 met+SU): a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 52(10):2046–2055CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Russell-Jones D, Vaag A, Schmitz O et al (2009) Liraglutide vs insulin glargine and placebo in combination with metformin and sulfonylurea therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (LEAD-5 met+SU): a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 52(10):2046–2055CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Garber A, Henry R, Ratner R et al (2009) Liraglutide versus glimepiride monotherapy for type 2 diabetes (LEAD-3 Mono): a randomised, 52-week, phase III, double-blind, parallel-treatment trial. Lancet 373(9662):473–481CrossRefPubMed Garber A, Henry R, Ratner R et al (2009) Liraglutide versus glimepiride monotherapy for type 2 diabetes (LEAD-3 Mono): a randomised, 52-week, phase III, double-blind, parallel-treatment trial. Lancet 373(9662):473–481CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Nauck M, Frid A, Hermansen K et al (2009) Efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride, and placebo, all in combination with metformin, in type 2 diabetes: the LEAD (liraglutide effect and action in diabetes)-2 study. Diabetes Care 32(1):84–90CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nauck M, Frid A, Hermansen K et al (2009) Efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride, and placebo, all in combination with metformin, in type 2 diabetes: the LEAD (liraglutide effect and action in diabetes)-2 study. Diabetes Care 32(1):84–90CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Zinman B, Gerich J, Buse JB et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of the human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog liraglutide in combination with metformin and thiazolidinedione in patients with type 2 diabetes (LEAD-4 Met+TZD). Diabetes Care 32(7):1224–1230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zinman B, Gerich J, Buse JB et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of the human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog liraglutide in combination with metformin and thiazolidinedione in patients with type 2 diabetes (LEAD-4 Met+TZD). Diabetes Care 32(7):1224–1230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Nauck MA, Stewart MW, Perkins C et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist albiglutide (HARMONY 2): 52 week primary endpoint results from a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise. Diabetologia 59(2):266–274CrossRefPubMed Nauck MA, Stewart MW, Perkins C et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist albiglutide (HARMONY 2): 52 week primary endpoint results from a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise. Diabetologia 59(2):266–274CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Rosenstock J, Fonseca VA, Gross JL et al (2014) Advancing basal insulin replacement in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with insulin glargine plus oral agents: a comparison of adding albiglutide, a weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist, versus thrice-daily prandial insulin lispro. Diabetes Care 37(8):2317–2325CrossRefPubMed Rosenstock J, Fonseca VA, Gross JL et al (2014) Advancing basal insulin replacement in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with insulin glargine plus oral agents: a comparison of adding albiglutide, a weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist, versus thrice-daily prandial insulin lispro. Diabetes Care 37(8):2317–2325CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Ahrén B, Johnson SL, Stewart M et al (2014) HARMONY 3: 104-week randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of albiglutide compared with placebo, sitagliptin, and glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes taking metformin. Diabetes Care 37(8):2141–2148CrossRefPubMed Ahrén B, Johnson SL, Stewart M et al (2014) HARMONY 3: 104-week randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of albiglutide compared with placebo, sitagliptin, and glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes taking metformin. Diabetes Care 37(8):2141–2148CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Home PD, Shamanna P, Stewart M et al (2015) Efficacy and tolerability of albiglutide versus placebo or pioglitazone over 1 year in people with type 2 diabetes currently taking metformin and glimepiride: HARMONY 5. Diabetes Obes Metab 17(2):179–187CrossRefPubMed Home PD, Shamanna P, Stewart M et al (2015) Efficacy and tolerability of albiglutide versus placebo or pioglitazone over 1 year in people with type 2 diabetes currently taking metformin and glimepiride: HARMONY 5. Diabetes Obes Metab 17(2):179–187CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Barnett AH, Burger J, Johns D et al (2007) Tolerability and efficacy of exenatide and titrated insulin glargine in adult patients with type 2 diabetes previously uncontrolled with metformin or a sulfonylurea: a multinational, randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover noninferiority trial. Clin Ther 29:2333–2348CrossRefPubMed Barnett AH, Burger J, Johns D et al (2007) Tolerability and efficacy of exenatide and titrated insulin glargine in adult patients with type 2 diabetes previously uncontrolled with metformin or a sulfonylurea: a multinational, randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover noninferiority trial. Clin Ther 29:2333–2348CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Bergenstal R, Lewin A, Bailey T et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 versus exenatide in subjects with type 2 diabetes failing to achieve glycemic control with metformin and a sulfonylurea. Curr Med Res Opin 25:65–75CrossRefPubMed Bergenstal R, Lewin A, Bailey T et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 versus exenatide in subjects with type 2 diabetes failing to achieve glycemic control with metformin and a sulfonylurea. Curr Med Res Opin 25:65–75CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Pratley RE, Nauck MA, Barnett AH et al (2014) Once-weekly albiglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral drugs (HARMONY 7): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority phase 3 study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2:289–297CrossRefPubMed Pratley RE, Nauck MA, Barnett AH et al (2014) Once-weekly albiglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral drugs (HARMONY 7): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority phase 3 study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2:289–297CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Dungan KM, Povedano ST, Forst T et al (2014) Once-weekly dulaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-6): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 384:1349–1357CrossRefPubMed Dungan KM, Povedano ST, Forst T et al (2014) Once-weekly dulaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-6): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 384:1349–1357CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Terranova CO, Brakenridge CL, Lawler SP, Eakin EG, Reeves MM (2015) Effectiveness of lifestyle-based weight loss interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 17:371–378CrossRefPubMed Terranova CO, Brakenridge CL, Lawler SP, Eakin EG, Reeves MM (2015) Effectiveness of lifestyle-based weight loss interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 17:371–378CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Monami M, Lamanna C, Lambertucci L et al (2006) Fasting and post-prandial glycemia and their correlation with glycated hemoglobin in Type 2 diabetes. J Endocrinol Invest 29:619–624CrossRefPubMed Monami M, Lamanna C, Lambertucci L et al (2006) Fasting and post-prandial glycemia and their correlation with glycated hemoglobin in Type 2 diabetes. J Endocrinol Invest 29:619–624CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Meier JJ, Rosenstock J, Hincelin-Méry A et al (2015) Contrasting effects of lixisenatide and liraglutide on postprandial glycemic control, gastric emptying, and safety parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes on optimized insulin glargine with or without metformin: a randomized, open-label trial. Diabetes Care 38:1263–1273CrossRefPubMed Meier JJ, Rosenstock J, Hincelin-Méry A et al (2015) Contrasting effects of lixisenatide and liraglutide on postprandial glycemic control, gastric emptying, and safety parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes on optimized insulin glargine with or without metformin: a randomized, open-label trial. Diabetes Care 38:1263–1273CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Deacon CF, Mannucci E, Ahrén B (2012) Glycaemic efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors as add-on therapy to metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes-a review and meta analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 14:762–767CrossRefPubMed Deacon CF, Mannucci E, Ahrén B (2012) Glycaemic efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors as add-on therapy to metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes-a review and meta analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 14:762–767CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Tasyurek HM, Altunbas HA, Balci MK, Sanlioglu S (2014) Incretins: their physiology and application in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 30:354–371CrossRefPubMed Tasyurek HM, Altunbas HA, Balci MK, Sanlioglu S (2014) Incretins: their physiology and application in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 30:354–371CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Gumbiner B, Polonsky KS, Beltz WF, Wallace P, Brechtel G, Fink RI (1989) Effects of aging on insulin secretion. Diabetes 38(12):1549–1556CrossRefPubMed Gumbiner B, Polonsky KS, Beltz WF, Wallace P, Brechtel G, Fink RI (1989) Effects of aging on insulin secretion. Diabetes 38(12):1549–1556CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Jones AG, McDonald TJ, Shields BM et al (2016) Markers of β-cell failure predict poor glycemic response to GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 39:250–257PubMed Jones AG, McDonald TJ, Shields BM et al (2016) Markers of β-cell failure predict poor glycemic response to GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 39:250–257PubMed
43.
go back to reference Monami M, Ragghianti B, Zannoni S, Vitale V, Nreu B, Mannucci E (2016) Identification of predictors of response to basal insulin and DPP4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes failing to other therapies. Acta Diabetol 53:35–40CrossRefPubMed Monami M, Ragghianti B, Zannoni S, Vitale V, Nreu B, Mannucci E (2016) Identification of predictors of response to basal insulin and DPP4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes failing to other therapies. Acta Diabetol 53:35–40CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Lim S, An JH, Shin H et al (2012) Factors predicting therapeutic efficacy of combination treatment with sitagliptin and metformin in type 2 diabetic patients: the COSMETIC study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 77:215–223CrossRef Lim S, An JH, Shin H et al (2012) Factors predicting therapeutic efficacy of combination treatment with sitagliptin and metformin in type 2 diabetic patients: the COSMETIC study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 77:215–223CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predictors of response to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Authors
Matteo Monami
Ilaria Dicembrini
Besmir Nreu
Francesco Andreozzi
Giorgio Sesti
Edoardo Mannucci
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Acta Diabetologica / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0940-5429
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-017-1054-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

Acta Diabetologica 12/2017 Go to the issue