Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2021

01-01-2021 | Humeral Shaft Fracture | Original Article

Early outcomes of magnetic intramedullary compression nailing for humeral fractures

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The optimal treatment protocol for humeral shaft fractures at risk for nonunions is controversial. Here, we aim to describe magnetic intramedullary compression nailing as an option for these challenging scenarios and to evaluate its clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective case series was performed at an urban university-based level-1 trauma center. Patients aged 18–65 who underwent fixation of their at-risk humerus shaft fracture using the PRECICE nail were included in this investigation. These fractures are characterized by a persistent distraction gap, minimal callous formation, or malalignment greater than 20 degrees. The study data were collected through a retrospective chart review and review of the radiographic studies. Primary outcome measure was radiographic union. Secondary outcome measures included mechanical failure, nonunion, malunion, medical, and surgical complications. Functional outcome was determined by range of motion and restoration of rotator cuff strength.

Results

A total of six patients were included who underwent treatment of their humeral shaft fracture with a NuVasive PRECICE nail after failure of conservative management. After nail placement along with our compression protocol, all patients achieved bony union and experienced favorable outcomes with return to their previous working status. Two complications included a superficial incisional infection treated with antibiotics and a backing out of proximal screw which did not cause discomfort. No other mechanical failures, surgical complications, or medical complications occurred.

Conclusions

Early results of controlled compression nailing for humeral shaft fracture demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes. This technique may be utilized for these challenging situations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cadet ER, Yin B, Schulz B, Ahmad CS, Rosenwasser MP (2013) Proximal humerus and humeral shaft nonunions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(9):538–547PubMed Cadet ER, Yin B, Schulz B, Ahmad CS, Rosenwasser MP (2013) Proximal humerus and humeral shaft nonunions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(9):538–547PubMed
2.
go back to reference Volgas DA, Stannard JP, Alonso JE (2004) Nonunions of the humerus. Clin Orthop 419:46–50CrossRef Volgas DA, Stannard JP, Alonso JE (2004) Nonunions of the humerus. Clin Orthop 419:46–50CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Koch PP, Gross DF, Gerber C (2002) The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:143–150CrossRef Koch PP, Gross DF, Gerber C (2002) The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:143–150CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ekholm R, Tidermark J, Törnkvist H et al (2006) Outcome after closed functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 20:591–596CrossRef Ekholm R, Tidermark J, Törnkvist H et al (2006) Outcome after closed functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 20:591–596CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rutgers M, Ring D (2006) Treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus using a functional brace. J Orthop Trauma 20:597–601CrossRef Rutgers M, Ring D (2006) Treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus using a functional brace. J Orthop Trauma 20:597–601CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Toivanen JA, Nieminen J, Laine HJ et al (2005) Functional treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures. Int Orthop 29:10–13CrossRef Toivanen JA, Nieminen J, Laine HJ et al (2005) Functional treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures. Int Orthop 29:10–13CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Updegrove GF, Mourad W, Abboud JA (2018) Humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 27:e87–e97CrossRef Updegrove GF, Mourad W, Abboud JA (2018) Humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 27:e87–e97CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kurtz AM, Rozbruch SR (2017) Humerus lengthening with the PRECICE internal lengthening nail. J Pediatr Orthop 37(4):e296–e300CrossRef Kurtz AM, Rozbruch SR (2017) Humerus lengthening with the PRECICE internal lengthening nail. J Pediatr Orthop 37(4):e296–e300CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fürmetz J, Kold S, Schuster N, Wolf F, Thaller PH (2017) Lengthening of the humerus with intramedullary lengthening nails—preliminary report. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 12(2):99–106CrossRef Fürmetz J, Kold S, Schuster N, Wolf F, Thaller PH (2017) Lengthening of the humerus with intramedullary lengthening nails—preliminary report. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 12(2):99–106CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hammouda AI, Standard SC, Rozbruch SR, Herzenberg JE (2017) Humeral lengthening with the PRECICE magnetic lengthening nail. HSS J 13(3):217–223CrossRef Hammouda AI, Standard SC, Rozbruch SR, Herzenberg JE (2017) Humeral lengthening with the PRECICE magnetic lengthening nail. HSS J 13(3):217–223CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Watson JT, Sanders RW (2017) Controlled compression nailing for at risk humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 31(6 Suppl):S25CrossRef Watson JT, Sanders RW (2017) Controlled compression nailing for at risk humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 31(6 Suppl):S25CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Neuhaus V, Menendez M, Kurylo JC, Dyer GS, Jawa A, Ring D (2014) Risk factors for fracture mobility six weeks after initiation of brace treatment of mid-diaphyseal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(5):403–407CrossRef Neuhaus V, Menendez M, Kurylo JC, Dyer GS, Jawa A, Ring D (2014) Risk factors for fracture mobility six weeks after initiation of brace treatment of mid-diaphyseal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(5):403–407CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sarmiento A, Zagorski JB, Zych GA et al (2000) Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:478–486CrossRef Sarmiento A, Zagorski JB, Zych GA et al (2000) Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:478–486CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Driesman AS, Fisher N, Karia R, Konda S, Egol KA (2017) Fracture site mobility at 6 weeks after humeral shaft fracture predicts nonunion without surgery. J Orthop Trauma 31(12):657–662CrossRef Driesman AS, Fisher N, Karia R, Konda S, Egol KA (2017) Fracture site mobility at 6 weeks after humeral shaft fracture predicts nonunion without surgery. J Orthop Trauma 31(12):657–662CrossRef
15.
go back to reference NuVasive PRECICE UNTYE Humeral Nail [Surgical Technique] (2017) NuVasive Specialized Orthopedics Inc, Aliso Viejo, CA NuVasive PRECICE UNTYE Humeral Nail [Surgical Technique] (2017) NuVasive Specialized Orthopedics Inc, Aliso Viejo, CA
16.
go back to reference Harkin FE, Large RJ (2017) Humeral shaft fractures: union outcomes in a large cohort. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:1881–1888CrossRef Harkin FE, Large RJ (2017) Humeral shaft fractures: union outcomes in a large cohort. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:1881–1888CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Peters RM, Claessen FM, Doornberg JN et al (2015) Union rate after operative treatment of humeral shaft nonunion: a systematic review. Injury 46:2314–2324CrossRef Peters RM, Claessen FM, Doornberg JN et al (2015) Union rate after operative treatment of humeral shaft nonunion: a systematic review. Injury 46:2314–2324CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gessmann J, Königshausen M, Coulibaly MO et al (2016) Anterior augmentation plating of aseptic humeral shaft nonunions after intramedullary nailing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:631–638CrossRef Gessmann J, Königshausen M, Coulibaly MO et al (2016) Anterior augmentation plating of aseptic humeral shaft nonunions after intramedullary nailing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:631–638CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hammouda A, Jauregui JJ, Gesheff MG, Standard SC, Conway JD, Herzenberg JE (2017) Treatment of post-traumatic femoral discrepancy with PRECICE magnetic-powered intramedullary lengthening nails. J Orthop Trauma 31:369–374CrossRef Hammouda A, Jauregui JJ, Gesheff MG, Standard SC, Conway JD, Herzenberg JE (2017) Treatment of post-traumatic femoral discrepancy with PRECICE magnetic-powered intramedullary lengthening nails. J Orthop Trauma 31:369–374CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chen F, Wang Z, Bhattacharyya T (2013) Outcomes of nails vs. plates for humeral shaft fractures: a medicare cohort study. J Orthop Trauma 27(2):68CrossRef Chen F, Wang Z, Bhattacharyya T (2013) Outcomes of nails vs. plates for humeral shaft fractures: a medicare cohort study. J Orthop Trauma 27(2):68CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Richardson SS, Schairer WW, Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR (2019) Cost comparison of femoral distraction osteogenesis with external lengthening over a nail versus internal magnetic lengthening nail. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 27(9):e430–e436CrossRef Richardson SS, Schairer WW, Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR (2019) Cost comparison of femoral distraction osteogenesis with external lengthening over a nail versus internal magnetic lengthening nail. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 27(9):e430–e436CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Krieg AH, Lenze U, Speth BM, Hasler CC (2011) Intramedullary leg lengthening with a motorized nail: indications, challenges, and outcome in 32 patients. Acta Orthop 82(3):344–350CrossRef Krieg AH, Lenze U, Speth BM, Hasler CC (2011) Intramedullary leg lengthening with a motorized nail: indications, challenges, and outcome in 32 patients. Acta Orthop 82(3):344–350CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Early outcomes of magnetic intramedullary compression nailing for humeral fractures
Publication date
01-01-2021
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02735-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2021 Go to the issue