Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction 2/2017

Open Access 01-08-2017 | Original Article

Lengthening of the humerus with intramedullary lengthening nails—preliminary report

Authors: Julian Fürmetz, Søren Kold, Nikola Schuster, Florian Wolf, Peter H. Thaller

Published in: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Distraction osteogenesis of the humerus with fully implantable lengthening is now possible since the diameter of the available nails was reduced to 10 mm and below. We report on the first intramedullary lengthening cases of the humerus with two different lengthening devices (FITBONE and PRECICE). Two different approaches and implantation techniques were used. We retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiographic data and pointed out results, pitfalls and complications of the procedure. Four adult patients with relevant length discrepancy of the humerus were treated with fully implantable systems in two centers between 2012 and 2015. Three patients were treated with FITBONE by an antegrade approach; one patient had lengthening with a PRECICE and a retrograde approach. Average nail lengthening was 55 mm (40–65 mm), and the average duration of lengthening was 70 days (52–95 days). The average distraction index was 0.72 mm/day (range 0.4–1.0 mm/day) or 12.5 days/cm (range 8.0–16.2 days/cm). The average consolidation index was 33.6 days/cm (range 25–45 days/cm). There was an implant failure (arrest) with the PRECICE. After consolidation and exchange with a technically improved implant, the course of treatment was uneventful. In patients with antegrade lengthening shoulder abduction decreased, and in the patient with the retrograde approach it improved but elbow extension decreased marginally. Reduced motion of the adjacent joints can be a major problem in intramedullary lengthening of the humerus. This first case series in the field of a rare indication suggests that lengthening of the humerus by fully implantable lengthening nails might be a valuable alternative to lengthening with external fixation. Main advantage of the PRECICE technology is the possible shortening in-between of lengthening.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ilizarov GA (1990) Clinical application of the tension–stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 250:8–26 Ilizarov GA (1990) Clinical application of the tension–stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 250:8–26
2.
go back to reference Tetsworth K, Krome J, Paley D (1991) Lengthening and deformity correction of the upper extremity by the Ilizarov technique. Orthop Clin North Am 22:689–713PubMed Tetsworth K, Krome J, Paley D (1991) Lengthening and deformity correction of the upper extremity by the Ilizarov technique. Orthop Clin North Am 22:689–713PubMed
3.
go back to reference Dick HM, Tietjen R (1978) Humeral lengthening for septic neonatal growth arrest. Case report. J Bone Jt Surg Am 60:1138–1139CrossRef Dick HM, Tietjen R (1978) Humeral lengthening for septic neonatal growth arrest. Case report. J Bone Jt Surg Am 60:1138–1139CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cattaneo R, Villa A, Catagni MA, Bell D (1990) Lengthening of the humerus using the Ilizarov technique. Description of the method and report of 43 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 250:117–124 Cattaneo R, Villa A, Catagni MA, Bell D (1990) Lengthening of the humerus using the Ilizarov technique. Description of the method and report of 43 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 250:117–124
5.
go back to reference Hosny GA (2005) Unilateral humeral lengthening in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop Part B 14:439–443CrossRef Hosny GA (2005) Unilateral humeral lengthening in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop Part B 14:439–443CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kashiwagi N, Suzuki S, Seto Y, Futami T (2001) Bilateral humeral lengthening in achondroplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391:251–257CrossRef Kashiwagi N, Suzuki S, Seto Y, Futami T (2001) Bilateral humeral lengthening in achondroplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391:251–257CrossRef
7.
8.
go back to reference Pawar AY, McCoy TH, Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR (2013) Does humeral lengthening with a monolateral frame improve function? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:277–283CrossRefPubMed Pawar AY, McCoy TH, Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR (2013) Does humeral lengthening with a monolateral frame improve function? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:277–283CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Balci HI, Kocaoglu M, Sen C, Eralp L, Batibay SG, Bilsel K (2015) Bilateral humeral lengthening in achondroplasia with unilateral external fixators: is it safe and does it improve daily life? Bone Jt J 97-B:1577–1581CrossRef Balci HI, Kocaoglu M, Sen C, Eralp L, Batibay SG, Bilsel K (2015) Bilateral humeral lengthening in achondroplasia with unilateral external fixators: is it safe and does it improve daily life? Bone Jt J 97-B:1577–1581CrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Betz A, Baumgart R, Schweiberer L (1990) First fully implantable intramedullary system for callus distraction–intramedullary nail with programmable drive for leg lengthening and segment displacement. Principles and initial clinical results. Chir Z Für Alle Geb Oper Med 61:605–609 Betz A, Baumgart R, Schweiberer L (1990) First fully implantable intramedullary system for callus distraction–intramedullary nail with programmable drive for leg lengthening and segment displacement. Principles and initial clinical results. Chir Z Für Alle Geb Oper Med 61:605–609
12.
go back to reference Cole JD, Justin D, Kasparis T, DeVlught D, Knobloch C (2001) The intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD): first clinical results of a new intramedullary nail for lengthening of the femur and tibia. Injury 32(Suppl 4):SD129–SD139CrossRefPubMed Cole JD, Justin D, Kasparis T, DeVlught D, Knobloch C (2001) The intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD): first clinical results of a new intramedullary nail for lengthening of the femur and tibia. Injury 32(Suppl 4):SD129–SD139CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hankemeier S, Pape H-C, Gosling T, Hufner T, Richter M, Krettek C (2004) Improved comfort in lower limb lengthening with the intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor. Principles and preliminary clinical experiences. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:129–133CrossRefPubMed Hankemeier S, Pape H-C, Gosling T, Hufner T, Richter M, Krettek C (2004) Improved comfort in lower limb lengthening with the intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor. Principles and preliminary clinical experiences. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:129–133CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Guichet J-M, Deromedis B, Donnan LT, Peretti G, Lascombes P, Bado F (2003) Gradual femoral lengthening with the Albizzia intramedullary nail. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-A:838–848CrossRef Guichet J-M, Deromedis B, Donnan LT, Peretti G, Lascombes P, Bado F (2003) Gradual femoral lengthening with the Albizzia intramedullary nail. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-A:838–848CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kenawey M, Krettek C, Liodakis E, Wiebking U, Hankemeier S (2011) Leg lengthening using intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor: results of 57 consecutive applications. Injury 42:150–155CrossRefPubMed Kenawey M, Krettek C, Liodakis E, Wiebking U, Hankemeier S (2011) Leg lengthening using intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor: results of 57 consecutive applications. Injury 42:150–155CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Thaller PH, Zoffl F, Delhey P (2010 ) Comparison between fully implantable monitorized and mechanical distraction nails—a matched-pairs analysis. In 3rd world congress on external fixation and 6th congress of the ASAMI international presented at: podium session 37: bone reconstruction 6, Barcelona Thaller PH, Zoffl F, Delhey P (2010 ) Comparison between fully implantable monitorized and mechanical distraction nails—a matched-pairs analysis. In 3rd world congress on external fixation and 6th congress of the ASAMI international presented at: podium session 37: bone reconstruction 6, Barcelona
17.
go back to reference Thaller PH, Fürmetz J, Wolf F, Eilers T, Mutschler W (2014) Limb lengthening with fully implantable magnetically actuated mechanical nails (PHENIX(®))-preliminary results. Injury 45(Suppl 1):S60–S65CrossRefPubMed Thaller PH, Fürmetz J, Wolf F, Eilers T, Mutschler W (2014) Limb lengthening with fully implantable magnetically actuated mechanical nails (PHENIX(®))-preliminary results. Injury 45(Suppl 1):S60–S65CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Makhdom AM, Cartaleanu AS, Rendon JS, Villemure I, Hamdy RC (2015) The accordion maneuver: a noninvasive strategy for absent or delayed callus formation in cases of limb lengthening. Adv Orthop 2015:912790 Makhdom AM, Cartaleanu AS, Rendon JS, Villemure I, Hamdy RC (2015) The accordion maneuver: a noninvasive strategy for absent or delayed callus formation in cases of limb lengthening. Adv Orthop 2015:912790
21.
go back to reference Euler SA, Hengg C, Kolp D, Wambacher M, Kralinger F (2014) Lack of fifth anchoring point and violation of the insertion of the rotator cuff during antegrade humeral nailing pitfalls in straight antegrade humeral nailing. Bone Jt J 96-B:249–253CrossRef Euler SA, Hengg C, Kolp D, Wambacher M, Kralinger F (2014) Lack of fifth anchoring point and violation of the insertion of the rotator cuff during antegrade humeral nailing pitfalls in straight antegrade humeral nailing. Bone Jt J 96-B:249–253CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Scheerlinck T, Handelberg F (2002) Functional outcome after intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: comparison between retrograde Marchetti-Vicenzi and unreamed AO antegrade nailing. J Trauma 52:60–71PubMed Scheerlinck T, Handelberg F (2002) Functional outcome after intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: comparison between retrograde Marchetti-Vicenzi and unreamed AO antegrade nailing. J Trauma 52:60–71PubMed
24.
go back to reference Jauregui JJ, Bor N, Thakral R, Standard SC, Paley D, Herzenberg JE (2015) Life- and limb-threatening infections following the use of an external fixator. Bone Jt J 97-B:1296–1300CrossRef Jauregui JJ, Bor N, Thakral R, Standard SC, Paley D, Herzenberg JE (2015) Life- and limb-threatening infections following the use of an external fixator. Bone Jt J 97-B:1296–1300CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Lengthening of the humerus with intramedullary lengthening nails—preliminary report
Authors
Julian Fürmetz
Søren Kold
Nikola Schuster
Florian Wolf
Peter H. Thaller
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1828-8936
Electronic ISSN: 1828-8928
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11751-017-0286-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction 2/2017 Go to the issue