Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 7/2019

01-10-2019 | Painful Arc | Letter to the Editor • SHOULDER - ARTHROSCOPY

What is wrong in comparison of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears?

Author: Alper Deveci

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 7/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

When the meta-analysis studies comparing single-row (SR) and double-row (DR) repair methods in the literature are examined, the SR method is unsuccessful in re-tears especially in large and massive tears. In this study, I was able to determine that, except for Barber’s work, double-loaded anchors were used for the SR repair. Particularly, low tension of the repaired muscle–tendon unit is important in terms of repairable massive retracted cuff tears. For this reason, medially placed triple-loaded anchors were developed. Again, the SR ripstop method using suture tape, in terms of re-tears and success rates, is similar to the double-row suture bridge method. Based on current systemic review and meta-analysis studies, it is not appropriate to adapt SR and DR rotator cuff repair results to today’s conditions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barber FA (2016) Triple-loaded single-row versus suture-bridge double-row rotator cuff tendon repair with platelet-rich plasma fibrin membrane: a randomized controlled trial. Arthroscopy 32(5):753–761CrossRef Barber FA (2016) Triple-loaded single-row versus suture-bridge double-row rotator cuff tendon repair with platelet-rich plasma fibrin membrane: a randomized controlled trial. Arthroscopy 32(5):753–761CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jost PW, Khair MM, Chen DX, Wright TW, Kelly AM, Rodeo SA (2012) Suture number determines strength of rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1–7CrossRef Jost PW, Khair MM, Chen DX, Wright TW, Kelly AM, Rodeo SA (2012) Suture number determines strength of rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1–7CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Carbone S, Razzano C, Passaretti D, Mezzoprete R (2018) Arthroscopic single-row repair of massive potentially irreparable postero-superior cuff tear. Musculoskelet Surg 102(Suppl 1):13–19CrossRef Carbone S, Razzano C, Passaretti D, Mezzoprete R (2018) Arthroscopic single-row repair of massive potentially irreparable postero-superior cuff tear. Musculoskelet Surg 102(Suppl 1):13–19CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Noyes MP, Ladermann A, Denard PJ (2017) Functional outcome and healing of large and massive rotator cuff tears repaired with a load-sharing rip-stop construct. Arthroscopy 33:1654–1658CrossRef Noyes MP, Ladermann A, Denard PJ (2017) Functional outcome and healing of large and massive rotator cuff tears repaired with a load-sharing rip-stop construct. Arthroscopy 33:1654–1658CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dierckman BD, Ni JJ, Karzel RP, Getelman MH (2018) Excellent healing rates and patient satisfaction after arthroscopic repair of medium to large rotator cuff tears with a single-row technique augmented with bone marrow vents. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(1):136–145CrossRef Dierckman BD, Ni JJ, Karzel RP, Getelman MH (2018) Excellent healing rates and patient satisfaction after arthroscopic repair of medium to large rotator cuff tears with a single-row technique augmented with bone marrow vents. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(1):136–145CrossRef
Metadata
Title
What is wrong in comparison of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears?
Author
Alper Deveci
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Paris
Keyword
Painful Arc
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 7/2019
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02462-y

Other articles of this Issue 7/2019

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 7/2019 Go to the issue