Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 10/2018

01-10-2018 | Original Article

Does the META score evaluating osteoporotic and metastatic vertebral fractures have enough agreement to be used by orthopaedic surgeons with different levels of training?

Authors: Julio Urrutia, Pablo Besa, Sergio Morales, Antonio Parlange, Sebastian Flores, Mauricio Campos, Sebastian Mobarec

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 10/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Differentiating osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) from metastatic vertebral fractures (MVF) is difficult. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based score (META score) aiming to differentiate OVF and MVF was recently published; however, an independent agreement assessment is required before the score is used. We performed such independent agreement evaluation, including raters with different levels of training.

Methods

Sixty-four patients with confirmed OVF or MVF were evaluated by six raters (three spine surgeons and three orthopaedic residents) using the META score. We used the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) to evaluate inter- and intra-observer agreement and the kappa statistic (κ) to determine the agreement for individual score criteria. We calculated the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) to establish the score accuracy.

Results

The inter-observer agreement was poor [ICC = 0.22 (0.12–0.33)]; spine surgeons [ICC = 0.75 (0.66–0.83)] had better agreement than that of residents [ICC = 0.06 (− 0.07 to 0.23)]. The intra-observer agreement was poor [ICC = 0.15 (− 0.04 to 0.30)]; both spine surgeons [ICC = 0.21 (0.05–0.41)] and residents exhibited poor agreement [ICC = − 0.06 (− 0.40 to 0.20)]. The agreement for each specific criterion varied from κ = 0.24 to κ = 0.38. The AUC was 0.57 (0.64 for spine surgeons and 0.51 for residents, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

The inter-observer agreement using the META score was adequate for spine surgeons but not for residents; the intra-observer agreement was poor. These results do not support the standard use of the META score to differentiate OVF and MVF.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Baur A, Huber A, Ertl-Wagner B, Durr R, Zysk S, Arbogast S, Deimling M, Reiser M (2001) Diagnostic value of increased diffusion weighting of a steady-state free precession sequence for differentiating acute benign osteoporotic fractures from pathologic vertebral compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:366–372PubMed Baur A, Huber A, Ertl-Wagner B, Durr R, Zysk S, Arbogast S, Deimling M, Reiser M (2001) Diagnostic value of increased diffusion weighting of a steady-state free precession sequence for differentiating acute benign osteoporotic fractures from pathologic vertebral compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:366–372PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, Hanley DA, Barton I, Broy SB, Licata A, Benhamou L, Geusens P, Flowers K, Stracke H, Seeman E (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 285:320–323CrossRef Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, Hanley DA, Barton I, Broy SB, Licata A, Benhamou L, Geusens P, Flowers K, Stracke H, Seeman E (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 285:320–323CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nevitt MC, Ettinger B, Black DM, Stone K, Jamal SA, Ensrud K, Segal M, Genant HK, Cummings SR (1998) The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med 128:793–800CrossRef Nevitt MC, Ettinger B, Black DM, Stone K, Jamal SA, Ensrud K, Segal M, Genant HK, Cummings SR (1998) The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med 128:793–800CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kubota T, Yamada K, Ito H, Kizu O, Nishimura T (2005) High-resolution imaging of the spine using multidetector-row computed tomography: differentiation between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:712–719CrossRef Kubota T, Yamada K, Ito H, Kizu O, Nishimura T (2005) High-resolution imaging of the spine using multidetector-row computed tomography: differentiation between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:712–719CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shih TT, Huang KM, Li YW (1999) Solitary vertebral collapse: distinction between benign and malignant causes using MR patterns. J Magn Reson Imag 9:635–642CrossRef Shih TT, Huang KM, Li YW (1999) Solitary vertebral collapse: distinction between benign and malignant causes using MR patterns. J Magn Reson Imag 9:635–642CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A (1998) Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 17:101–110CrossRef Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A (1998) Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 17:101–110CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hallgren KA (2012) Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 8:23–34CrossRef Hallgren KA (2012) Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 8:23–34CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fleiss J (1986) The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley, New York, pp 1–31 Fleiss J (1986) The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley, New York, pp 1–31
14.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rupp RE, Ebraheim NA, Coombs RJ (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging differentiation of compression spine fractures or vertebral lesions caused by osteoporosis or tumor. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:2499–2503 (Discussion 2504) CrossRef Rupp RE, Ebraheim NA, Coombs RJ (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging differentiation of compression spine fractures or vertebral lesions caused by osteoporosis or tumor. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:2499–2503 (Discussion 2504) CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tan DY, Tsou IY, Chee TS (2002) Differentiation of malignant vertebral collapse from osteoporotic and other benign causes using magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Acad Med Singap 31:8–14PubMed Tan DY, Tsou IY, Chee TS (2002) Differentiation of malignant vertebral collapse from osteoporotic and other benign causes using magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Acad Med Singap 31:8–14PubMed
22.
go back to reference Brorson S, Bagger J, Sylvest A, Hrobjartsson A (2002) Improved interobserver variation after training of doctors in the Neer system. A randomised trial. J Bone Jt Surg Br 84:950–954CrossRef Brorson S, Bagger J, Sylvest A, Hrobjartsson A (2002) Improved interobserver variation after training of doctors in the Neer system. A randomised trial. J Bone Jt Surg Br 84:950–954CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kalenderer O, Agus H, Ozcalabi IT, Ozluk S (2005) The importance of surgeons’ experience on intraobserver and interobserver reliability of classifications used for Perthes disease. J Pediatr Orthop 25:460–464CrossRef Kalenderer O, Agus H, Ozcalabi IT, Ozluk S (2005) The importance of surgeons’ experience on intraobserver and interobserver reliability of classifications used for Perthes disease. J Pediatr Orthop 25:460–464CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Urrutia J, Zamora T, Klaber I, Carmona M, Palma J, Campos M, Yurac R (2016) Do thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries classification systems exhibit lower inter- and intra-observer agreement than other fractures classifications?: a comparison using fractures of the trochanteric area of the proximal femur as contrast model. Injury 47:859–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.016 CrossRefPubMed Urrutia J, Zamora T, Klaber I, Carmona M, Palma J, Campos M, Yurac R (2016) Do thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries classification systems exhibit lower inter- and intra-observer agreement than other fractures classifications?: a comparison using fractures of the trochanteric area of the proximal femur as contrast model. Injury 47:859–864. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​injury.​2015.​11.​016 CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Sanders R (1997) The problem with apples and oranges [editorial]. J Orthop Trauma 11:465–466CrossRef Sanders R (1997) The problem with apples and oranges [editorial]. J Orthop Trauma 11:465–466CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does the META score evaluating osteoporotic and metastatic vertebral fractures have enough agreement to be used by orthopaedic surgeons with different levels of training?
Authors
Julio Urrutia
Pablo Besa
Sergio Morales
Antonio Parlange
Sebastian Flores
Mauricio Campos
Sebastian Mobarec
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5694-x

Other articles of this Issue 10/2018

European Spine Journal 10/2018 Go to the issue