Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 7/2012

01-07-2012 | Clinical Research

Training Improves Interobserver Reliability for the Diagnosis of Scaphoid Fracture Displacement

Authors: Geert A. Buijze, MD, Thierry G. Guitton, PhD, C. Niek van Dijk, MD, PhD, David Ring, MD, PhD, The Science of Variation Group

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 7/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The diagnosis of displacement in scaphoid fractures is notorious for poor interobserver reliability.

Questions/purposes

We tested whether training can improve interobserver reliability and sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of scaphoid fracture displacement on radiographs and CT scans.

Methods

Sixty-four orthopaedic surgeons rated a set of radiographs and CT scans of 10 displaced and 10 nondisplaced scaphoid fractures for the presence of displacement, using a web-based rating application. Before rating, observers were randomized to a training group (34 observers) and a nontraining group (30 observers). The training group received an online training module before the rating session, and the nontraining group did not. Interobserver reliability for training and nontraining was assessed by Siegel’s multirater kappa and the Z-test was used to test for significance.

Results

There was a small, but significant difference in the interobserver reliability for displacement ratings in favor of the training group compared with the nontraining group. Ratings of radiographs and CT scans combined resulted in moderate agreement for both groups. The average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of diagnosing displacement of scaphoid fractures were, respectively, 83%, 85%, and 84% for the nontraining group and 87%, 86%, and 87% for the training group. Assuming a 5% prevalence of fracture displacement, the positive predictive value was 0.23 in the nontraining group and 0.25 in the training group. The negative predictive value was 0.99 in both groups.

Conclusions

Our results suggest training can improve interobserver reliability and sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the diagnosis of scaphoid fracture displacement, but the improvements are slight. These findings are encouraging for future research regarding interobserver variation and how to reduce it further.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amadio PC, Berquist TH, Smith DK, Ilstrup DM, Cooney WP III, Linscheid RL. Scaphoid malunion. J Hand Surg Am. 1989;14:679–687.PubMedCrossRef Amadio PC, Berquist TH, Smith DK, Ilstrup DM, Cooney WP III, Linscheid RL. Scaphoid malunion. J Hand Surg Am. 1989;14:679–687.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bain GI, Bennett JD, MacDermid JC, Slethaug GP, Richards RS, Roth JH. Measurement of the scaphoid humpback deformity using longitudinal computed tomography: intra- and interobserver variability using various measurement techniques. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23:76–81.PubMedCrossRef Bain GI, Bennett JD, MacDermid JC, Slethaug GP, Richards RS, Roth JH. Measurement of the scaphoid humpback deformity using longitudinal computed tomography: intra- and interobserver variability using various measurement techniques. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23:76–81.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bankier AA, Fleischmann D, De Maertelaer V, Kontrus M, Zontsich T, Hittmair K, Mallek R. Subjective differentiation of normal and pathological bronchi on thin-section CT: impact of observer training. Eur Respir J. 1999;13:781–786.PubMedCrossRef Bankier AA, Fleischmann D, De Maertelaer V, Kontrus M, Zontsich T, Hittmair K, Mallek R. Subjective differentiation of normal and pathological bronchi on thin-section CT: impact of observer training. Eur Respir J. 1999;13:781–786.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Berg WA, D’Orsi CJ, Jackson VP, Bassett LW, Beam CA, Lewis RS, Crewson PE. Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? Radiology. 2002;224:871–880.PubMedCrossRef Berg WA, D’Orsi CJ, Jackson VP, Bassett LW, Beam CA, Lewis RS, Crewson PE. Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? Radiology. 2002;224:871–880.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bernard SA, Murray PM, Heckman MG. Validity of conventional radiography in determining scaphoid waist fracture displacement. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:448–451.PubMedCrossRef Bernard SA, Murray PM, Heckman MG. Validity of conventional radiography in determining scaphoid waist fracture displacement. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:448–451.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bernstein J, Adler LM, Blank JE, Dalsey RM, Williams GR, Iannotti JP. Evaluation of the Neer system of classification of proximal humeral fractures with computerized tomographic scans and plain radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1371–1375.PubMed Bernstein J, Adler LM, Blank JE, Dalsey RM, Williams GR, Iannotti JP. Evaluation of the Neer system of classification of proximal humeral fractures with computerized tomographic scans and plain radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1371–1375.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Brorson S, Bagger J, Sylvest A, Hrobjartsson A. Improved interobserver variation after training of doctors in the Neer system: a randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:950–954.PubMedCrossRef Brorson S, Bagger J, Sylvest A, Hrobjartsson A. Improved interobserver variation after training of doctors in the Neer system: a randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:950–954.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.CrossRef Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cooney WP, Dobyns JH, Linscheid RL. Fractures of the scaphoid: a rational approach to management. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;149:90–97.PubMed Cooney WP, Dobyns JH, Linscheid RL. Fractures of the scaphoid: a rational approach to management. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;149:90–97.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Dabezies EJ, Mathews R, Faust DC. Injuries to the carpus: fractures of the scaphoid. Orthopedics. 1982;5:1510–1515. Dabezies EJ, Mathews R, Faust DC. Injuries to the carpus: fractures of the scaphoid. Orthopedics. 1982;5:1510–1515.
11.
go back to reference de Vet HC, Koudstaal J, Kwee WS, Willebrand D, Arends JW. Efforts to improve interobserver agreement in histopathological grading. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:869–873.PubMedCrossRef de Vet HC, Koudstaal J, Kwee WS, Willebrand D, Arends JW. Efforts to improve interobserver agreement in histopathological grading. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:869–873.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Desai VV, Davis TR, Barton NJ. The prognostic value and reproducibility of the radiological features of the fractured scaphoid. J Hand Surg Br. 1999;24:586–590.PubMed Desai VV, Davis TR, Barton NJ. The prognostic value and reproducibility of the radiological features of the fractured scaphoid. J Hand Surg Br. 1999;24:586–590.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Eddeland A, Eiken O, Hellgren E, Ohlsson NM. Fractures of the scaphoid. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;9:234–239.PubMedCrossRef Eddeland A, Eiken O, Hellgren E, Ohlsson NM. Fractures of the scaphoid. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;9:234–239.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lozano-Calderon S, Blazar P, Zurakowski D, Lee SG, Ring D. Diagnosis of scaphoid fracture displacement with radiography and computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2695–2703.PubMedCrossRef Lozano-Calderon S, Blazar P, Zurakowski D, Lee SG, Ring D. Diagnosis of scaphoid fracture displacement with radiography and computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2695–2703.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lujan ME, Chizen DR, Peppin AK, Kriegler S, Leswick DA, Bloski TG, Pierson RA. Improving inter-observer variability in the evaluation of ultrasonographic features of polycystic ovaries. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2008;6:30.PubMedCrossRef Lujan ME, Chizen DR, Peppin AK, Kriegler S, Leswick DA, Bloski TG, Pierson RA. Improving inter-observer variability in the evaluation of ultrasonographic features of polycystic ovaries. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2008;6:30.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Magnan MA, Maklebust J. The effect of Web-based Braden Scale training on the reliability of Braden subscale ratings. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009;36:51–59.PubMedCrossRef Magnan MA, Maklebust J. The effect of Web-based Braden Scale training on the reliability of Braden subscale ratings. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009;36:51–59.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Patel AB, Amin A, Sortey SZ, Athawale A, Kulkarni H. Impact of training on observer variation in chest radiographs of children with severe pneumonia. Indian Pediatr. 2007;44:675–681.PubMed Patel AB, Amin A, Sortey SZ, Athawale A, Kulkarni H. Impact of training on observer variation in chest radiographs of children with severe pneumonia. Indian Pediatr. 2007;44:675–681.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Posner KL, Sampson PD, Caplan RA, Ward RJ, Cheney FW. Measuring interrater reliability among multiple raters: an example of methods for nominal data. Stat Med. 1990;9:1103–1115.PubMedCrossRef Posner KL, Sampson PD, Caplan RA, Ward RJ, Cheney FW. Measuring interrater reliability among multiple raters: an example of methods for nominal data. Stat Med. 1990;9:1103–1115.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ring D, Patterson JD, Levitz S, Wang C, Jupiter JB. Both scanning plane and observer affect measurements of scaphoid deformity. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30:696–701.PubMedCrossRef Ring D, Patterson JD, Levitz S, Wang C, Jupiter JB. Both scanning plane and observer affect measurements of scaphoid deformity. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30:696–701.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ripsweden J, Mir-Akbari H, Brolin EB, Brismar T, Nilsson T, Rasmussen E, Ruck A, Svensson A, Werner C, Winter R, Cederlund K. Is training essential for interpreting cardiac computed tomography? Acta Radiol. 2009;50:194–200.PubMedCrossRef Ripsweden J, Mir-Akbari H, Brolin EB, Brismar T, Nilsson T, Rasmussen E, Ruck A, Svensson A, Werner C, Winter R, Cederlund K. Is training essential for interpreting cardiac computed tomography? Acta Radiol. 2009;50:194–200.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sanders WE. Evaluation of the humpback scaphoid by computed tomography in the longitudinal axial plane of the scaphoid. J Hand Surg Am. 1988;13:182–187.PubMedCrossRef Sanders WE. Evaluation of the humpback scaphoid by computed tomography in the longitudinal axial plane of the scaphoid. J Hand Surg Am. 1988;13:182–187.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1988. Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1988.
24.
go back to reference Stieber J, Quirno M, Cunningham M, Errico TJ, Bendo JA. The reliability of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging grading of lumbar facet arthropathy in total disc replacement patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:E833–840. Stieber J, Quirno M, Cunningham M, Errico TJ, Bendo JA. The reliability of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging grading of lumbar facet arthropathy in total disc replacement patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:E833–840.
25.
go back to reference Szabo RM, Manske D. Displaced fractures of the scaphoid. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;230:30–38.PubMed Szabo RM, Manske D. Displaced fractures of the scaphoid. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;230:30–38.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Training Improves Interobserver Reliability for the Diagnosis of Scaphoid Fracture Displacement
Authors
Geert A. Buijze, MD
Thierry G. Guitton, PhD
C. Niek van Dijk, MD, PhD
David Ring, MD, PhD
The Science of Variation Group
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 7/2012
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2260-4

Other articles of this Issue 7/2012

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 7/2012 Go to the issue