Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Letter to the Editor

Letter to the editor concerning “Do we have the right PROMs for measuring outcomes in lumbar spinal surgery?” by O.M. Stokes et al. Eur Spine J (2017) 26:816–824

Authors: Lenie Denteneer, Ulrike Van Daele, Steven Truijen, Willem De Hertogh, Jill Meirte, Gaetane Stassijns

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

With great interest, we have read the narrative review written by O.M. Stokes and colleagues entitled “Do we have the right PROMs for measuring outcomes in lumbar spinal surgery?” [1]. The authors reviewed patient-reported outcome measures that are used to assess outcome in spinal surgery. One of their main findings was that the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is the most commonly used outcome measure for spinal conditions. Within the discussion section, the authors briefly mention the existence of a modified version of the ODI which removes the question regarding sex life disability, but they do not seem to report when and if such a modified version was used. This modified version has several advantages over the original ODI, and therefore, we wanted to provide some more insight in this matter and build a platform for further discussion. …
Literature
2.
go back to reference Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ (2001) A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther 81(2):776–788CrossRefPubMed Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ (2001) A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther 81(2):776–788CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Mehdian H, Montazeri A, Mobini B (2006) The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions. Spine 31(14):E454–E459. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000222141.61424.f7 CrossRefPubMed Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Mehdian H, Montazeri A, Mobini B (2006) The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions. Spine 31(14):E454–E459. doi:10.​1097/​01.​brs.​0000222141.​61424.​f7 CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bagraith KS, Hayes J, Strong J (2013) Mapping patient goals to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): examining the content validity of the low back pain core sets. J Rehabil Med 45(5):481–487. doi:10.2340/16501977-1134 CrossRefPubMed Bagraith KS, Hayes J, Strong J (2013) Mapping patient goals to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): examining the content validity of the low back pain core sets. J Rehabil Med 45(5):481–487. doi:10.​2340/​16501977-1134 CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Denteneer L, Stassijns G, Truijen S, De Herthogh W, Meirte J, Deckers K, Van Daele U (2017) The Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire: reliability, validity and responsiveness of a Dutch language version. Spine. doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000002304 PubMed Denteneer L, Stassijns G, Truijen S, De Herthogh W, Meirte J, Deckers K, Van Daele U (2017) The Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire: reliability, validity and responsiveness of a Dutch language version. Spine. doi:10.​1097/​brs.​0000000000002304​ PubMed
Metadata
Title
Letter to the editor concerning “Do we have the right PROMs for measuring outcomes in lumbar spinal surgery?” by O.M. Stokes et al. Eur Spine J (2017) 26:816–824
Authors
Lenie Denteneer
Ulrike Van Daele
Steven Truijen
Willem De Hertogh
Jill Meirte
Gaetane Stassijns
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5352-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

European Spine Journal 1/2018 Go to the issue