Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Original Article

German validation of the quality of life profile for spinal disorders (QLPSD)

Authors: Tobias L. Schulte, Meinald T. Thielsch, Georg Gosheger, Patrick Boertz, Jan Henrik Terheyden, Mark Wetterkamp

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Quality of Life Profile for Spine Deformities (QLPSD) is a self-reporting questionnaire designed for studying patients with spinal deformities.

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to systematically translate the QLPSD into German (G-QLPSD) and to test its reliability and validity. Special emphasis was intended to be given to patients with different Cobb angles and ages.

Methods

The QLPSD was systematically translated into German and was responded to in a web-based online survey by patients with idiopathic scoliosis and by healthy control individuals to carry out a matched-pair analysis. Participants aged 14 years and older were included. All participants answered a battery of validated questionnaires (SRS 22-r, PHQ-9, PANAS, FKS, WHO-5, BFI-S, PTQ). Reliability testing included Cronbach’s alpha and test–retest reliability (retest 8 weeks after initial testing). Factorial, convergent, divergent, concurrent, and discriminant validity were calculated.

Results

A total of 255 scoliosis patients (age 30.0 ± 16.7 years, Cobb angle 43.5° ± 20.9°) and 189 matched healthy control individuals were finally included. Cronbach’s alpha for the G-QLPSD total score was 0.93 and the test–retest reliability was 0.84. The G-QLPSD total score correlated with the SRS 22-r total score (r = −0.86). All concurrently applied scores showed strong correlations with the G-QLPSD (e.g., depression score PHQ-9: r = 0.70). The matched-pair analysis of 189 pairs showed strong discriminant validity (Cohen’s d = 0.78). Patients with more severe Cobb angles (≥40°) and those ≥18 years of age had significantly poorer results than patients with minor curves and younger patients.

Conclusion

The G-QLPSD proved to be a highly reliable and valid instrument that can be recommended for clinical use in scoliosis patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
According to the guidelines provided by Cohen [24], standardized mean differences of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 and more are considered to represent small, medium, and large effects, respectively.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Climent JM, Reig A, Sánchez J, Roda C (1995) Construction and validation of a specific quality of life instrument for adolescents with spine deformities. Spine (Phil Pa 1976) 20(18):2006–2011CrossRef Climent JM, Reig A, Sánchez J, Roda C (1995) Construction and validation of a specific quality of life instrument for adolescents with spine deformities. Spine (Phil Pa 1976) 20(18):2006–2011CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Howard A, Donaldson S, Hedden D, Stephens D, Alman B, Wright J (2007) Improvement in quality of life following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phil Pa 1976) 32(24):2715–2718CrossRef Howard A, Donaldson S, Hedden D, Stephens D, Alman B, Wright J (2007) Improvement in quality of life following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phil Pa 1976) 32(24):2715–2718CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Pham VM, Houlliez A, Carpentier A, Herbaux B, Schill A, Thevenon A (2008) Determination of the influence of the Chêneau brace on quality of life for adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis. Ann Réadaptation Med Phys 51:3–8CrossRef Pham VM, Houlliez A, Carpentier A, Herbaux B, Schill A, Thevenon A (2008) Determination of the influence of the Chêneau brace on quality of life for adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis. Ann Réadaptation Med Phys 51:3–8CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Korovessis P, Zacharatos S, Koureas G, Megas P (2007) Comparative multifactorial analysis of the effects of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis and Scheuermann kyphosis on the self-perceived health status of adolescents treated with brace. Eur Spine J 16:537–546CrossRefPubMed Korovessis P, Zacharatos S, Koureas G, Megas P (2007) Comparative multifactorial analysis of the effects of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis and Scheuermann kyphosis on the self-perceived health status of adolescents treated with brace. Eur Spine J 16:537–546CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bagó J, Climent JM, Pérez-Grueso FJS, Pellisé F (2013) Outcome instruments to assess scoliosis surgery. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 2):S195–S202CrossRefPubMed Bagó J, Climent JM, Pérez-Grueso FJS, Pellisé F (2013) Outcome instruments to assess scoliosis surgery. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 2):S195–S202CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Climent JM, Sánchez J, Group for the Study of QoL in Spine Deformities (1999) Impact of the type of brace on the quality of life of adolescents with spine deformities. Spine (Phil Pa 1976) 24(18):1903–1908CrossRef Climent JM, Sánchez J, Group for the Study of QoL in Spine Deformities (1999) Impact of the type of brace on the quality of life of adolescents with spine deformities. Spine (Phil Pa 1976) 24(18):1903–1908CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Davies E, Norvell D, Hermsmeyer J (2011) Efficacy of bracing versus observation in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Evid Based Spine Care J 2(2):25–34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Davies E, Norvell D, Hermsmeyer J (2011) Efficacy of bracing versus observation in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Evid Based Spine Care J 2(2):25–34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Sanchez-Raya J, Bago J, Pellise F, Cuxart A, Villanueva C (2012) Does the lower instrumented vertebra have an effect on lumbar mobility, subjective perception of trunk flexibility, and quality of life in patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated by spinal fusion? J Spinal Disord Tech 25(8):437–442CrossRefPubMed Sanchez-Raya J, Bago J, Pellise F, Cuxart A, Villanueva C (2012) Does the lower instrumented vertebra have an effect on lumbar mobility, subjective perception of trunk flexibility, and quality of life in patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated by spinal fusion? J Spinal Disord Tech 25(8):437–442CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Smith PL, Donaldson S, Hedden D, Alman B, Howard A, Stephens D, Wright JG (2006) Parents’ and patients’ perception of postoperative appearance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phil Pa 1976) 31(20):2367–2374CrossRef Smith PL, Donaldson S, Hedden D, Alman B, Howard A, Stephens D, Wright JG (2006) Parents’ and patients’ perception of postoperative appearance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phil Pa 1976) 31(20):2367–2374CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cook DA, Beckman TJ (2006) Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med 119(2):166-e7–16 Cook DA, Beckman TJ (2006) Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med 119(2):166-e7–16
13.
go back to reference Niemeyer T, Schubert C, Halm HF, Herberts T, Leichtle C, Gesicki M (2009) Validity and reliability of an adapted German Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(8):818–821. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819b33be CrossRef Niemeyer T, Schubert C, Halm HF, Herberts T, Leichtle C, Gesicki M (2009) Validity and reliability of an adapted German Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(8):818–821. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e31819b33be​ CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect. The PANAS scales. J Personal Soc Psychol 54(6):1063–1070CrossRef Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect. The PANAS scales. J Personal Soc Psychol 54(6):1063–1070CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Buhlmann U, Wilhelm S, Glaesmer H, Braehler E, Rief W (2009) Fragebogen körperdysmorpher symptome (FKS): Ein screening-instrument. Verhaltenstherapie 19:237–242. doi:10.1159/000246278 CrossRef Buhlmann U, Wilhelm S, Glaesmer H, Braehler E, Rief W (2009) Fragebogen körperdysmorpher symptome (FKS): Ein screening-instrument. Verhaltenstherapie 19:237–242. doi:10.​1159/​000246278 CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ehring T, Zetsche U, Weidacker K, Wahl K, Schoenfeld S, Ehlers A (2011) The Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ): validation of a content-independent measure of repetitive negative thinking. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 42(2):225–232CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ehring T, Zetsche U, Weidacker K, Wahl K, Schoenfeld S, Ehlers A (2011) The Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ): validation of a content-independent measure of repetitive negative thinking. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 42(2):225–232CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Topp CW, Østergaard SD, Søndergaard S, Bech P (2005) The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom 84(3):167–176. doi:10.1159/000376585 CrossRef Topp CW, Østergaard SD, Søndergaard S, Bech P (2005) The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom 84(3):167–176. doi:10.​1159/​000376585 CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wetterkamp M, Thielsch MT, Gosheger G, Boertz P, Terheyden JH, Schulte TL (2017) German validation of the BIDQ-S Questionnaire on body image disturbance in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 26(2):309–315. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4895-4 CrossRefPubMed Wetterkamp M, Thielsch MT, Gosheger G, Boertz P, Terheyden JH, Schulte TL (2017) German validation of the BIDQ-S Questionnaire on body image disturbance in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 26(2):309–315. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-016-4895-4 CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Dziuban CD, Shirkey EC (1974) When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychol Bull 81:358–361CrossRef Dziuban CD, Shirkey EC (1974) When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychol Bull 81:358–361CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
23.
go back to reference Anastasi A, Urbina S (1997) Psychological testing, 7th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River Anastasi A, Urbina S (1997) Psychological testing, 7th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
24.
go back to reference Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale
25.
go back to reference Matamalas A, Bagó J, D’Agata E, Pellisé F (2014) Body image in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison study of psychometric properties between four patient-reported outcome instruments. Health Qual Life Outcomes 12:81CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Matamalas A, Bagó J, D’Agata E, Pellisé F (2014) Body image in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison study of psychometric properties between four patient-reported outcome instruments. Health Qual Life Outcomes 12:81CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Feise RJ, Donaldson S, Crowther ER, Menke JM, Wright JG (2005) Construction and validation of the Scoliosis Quality of Life Index in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phil Pa 1976) 30(11):1310–1315CrossRef Feise RJ, Donaldson S, Crowther ER, Menke JM, Wright JG (2005) Construction and validation of the Scoliosis Quality of Life Index in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phil Pa 1976) 30(11):1310–1315CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Climent JM, Bago J, Ey A, Perez-Grueso FJ, Izquierdo E (2005) Validity of the Spanish Version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Patient Questionnaire. Spine (Phil Pa 1976) 30(6):705–709CrossRef Climent JM, Bago J, Ey A, Perez-Grueso FJ, Izquierdo E (2005) Validity of the Spanish Version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Patient Questionnaire. Spine (Phil Pa 1976) 30(6):705–709CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Zeh A, Planert M, Klima S, Hein W, Wohlrab D (2008) The flexible TriacTM-Brace for conservative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. An alternative treatment option? Acta Orthop Belg 74:512–521PubMed Zeh A, Planert M, Klima S, Hein W, Wohlrab D (2008) The flexible TriacTM-Brace for conservative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. An alternative treatment option? Acta Orthop Belg 74:512–521PubMed
30.
Metadata
Title
German validation of the quality of life profile for spinal disorders (QLPSD)
Authors
Tobias L. Schulte
Meinald T. Thielsch
Georg Gosheger
Patrick Boertz
Jan Henrik Terheyden
Mark Wetterkamp
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5284-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

European Spine Journal 1/2018 Go to the issue

Editorial

Editorial