Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Spine Journal
Published in: European Spine Journal 6/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Article

Nuclear magnetic resonance therapy in lumbar disc herniation with lumbar radicular syndrome: effects of the intervention on pain intensity, health-related quality of life, disease-related disability, consumption of pain medication, duration of sick leave and MRI analysis

Authors: H. Salfinger, G. Salomonowitz, K. M. Friedrich, J. Hahne, J. Holzapfel, M. Friedrich

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The objective was to assess the effects of therapeutic nuclear magnetic resonance (tNMR) as a conservative treatment for lumbar radicular syndrome (LRS) in patients with lumbar disc herniation.

Methods

The prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included 94 patients, aged 20–60 years (44.79 ± 8.83), with LRS caused by lumbar disc herniation confirmed by MRI scans and with clinical signs of a radicular lesion without indication for surgical intervention. Treatment group (TG) and control group (CG) received standard non-surgical therapy. Additionally, the TG had seven sessions with the tNMR device with a magnetic flux density of 2.3 mT and a frequency of 85 kHz; the CG received 7 sham treatments. Outcome parameters were the treatment effect on pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale—VAS), health-related quality of life (36-item Short Form Health Survey—SF-36), disease-related disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire—RMDQ), pain medication intake, duration of sick leave and morphological changes assessed by MRI scan analysis.

Results

VAS scores improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.000). Only in week 4, improvement in the TG significantly surpassed that of the CG (morning pain p = 0.011, evening pain = 0.001). In both groups, SF-36 scores reflected a significant amendment in the physical component score (p < 0.000) and a significant deterioration in the mental component score (p < 0.000). SF-36 scores did not differ significantly between groups. RMDQ showed a significant amelioration in both groups (TG and CG p < 0.000), with a tendency to a superior benefit in the TG (p = 0.083). Patients in the TG recorded significantly fewer days of sick leave in month 3 after treatment (p = 0.026). MRI scan summary scores improved significantly in both groups (L4/5 p < 0.000, L5/S1 p < 0.001) and did not differ significantly between the groups.

Conclusions

This trial was the first to investigate the effects of tNMR as an additional treatment of lumbar disc herniation with LRS. The application of tNMR did not meet MCID criteria. It rendered few statistically significant differences between patient groups. The overall results of this trial make a clinical implementation of tNMR in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with LRS appear premature. Further research is needed to better understand the mode of action of tNMR on compressed neural tissue and to elucidate the issue of the cost/benefit ratio.
Literature
1.
Waddell G (1987) A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 12(7):632–644CrossRef
2.
Chou R, Atlas SJ, Stanos SP et al (2009) Nonsurgical interventional therapies for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1078–1093CrossRef
3.
Chou R, Baisden J, Carragee EJ et al (2009) Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1094–1109CrossRef
4.
Cutler RB, Fishbain DA, Rosomoff HL et al (1994) Does nonsurgical pain center treatment of chronic pain return patients to work? A review and meta-analysis of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:643–652CrossRef
5.
6.
van Tulder MW, Koes B, Malmivaara A (2006) Outcome of non-invasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review. Eur Spine J 15:S64–S81CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
7.
Lin C-WC, Haas M, Maher CG, Machado LAC, van Tulder MW (2011) Cost-effectiveness of guideline-endorsed treatments for low back pain: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 20:1024–1038CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
8.
Diniz P, Soejima K, Ito G (2002) Nitric oxide mediates the effects of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation on the osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. Nitric Oxide 7:18–23CrossRefPubMed
9.
Temiz-Artmann A, Linder P, Kayser P et al (2005) NMR in vitro effects on proliferation, apoptosis, and viability of human chondrocytes and osteoblasts. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 27(6):391–394CrossRefPubMed
10.
Chang WHS, Chen LT, Sun JS, Lin FH (2004) Effect of pulse-burst electromagnetic field stimulation on osteoblast cell activities. Bioelectromagnetics 25:457–465CrossRefPubMed
11.
Yuge L, Okubo A, Miyashita T et al (2003) Physical stress by magnetic force accelerates differentiation of human osteoblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 311:32–38CrossRefPubMed
12.
Jacobson JI, Gorman R, Yamanashi WS, Saxena BB, Clayton L (2001) Low amplitude, extremely low frequency magnetic fields for the treatment of osteoarthritic knees: a double-blind clinical study. Altern Ther Health Med 7(5):54–64, 66–69
13.
De Mattei M, Caruso A, Pezzetti F, Pellati A, Stabellini G, Sollazzo V, Traina GC (2001) Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on human articular chondrocyte proliferation. Connect Tissue Res 42(4):269–279CrossRefPubMed
14.
Nicolin V, Ponti C, Baldini G et al (2007) In vitro exposure of human chondrocytes to pulsed electromagnetic fields. Eur J Histochem 51(3):203–211PubMed
15.
Ciombor DM, Aaron RK, Wang S, Simon B (2003) Modification of osteoarthritis by pulsed electromagnetic field—a morphological study. Osteoarthritis Cartil 11(6):455–462CrossRef
16.
Bodamyali T, Bhatt B, Hughes F (1998) Pulsed electromagnetic fields simultaneously induce osteogenesis and upregulate transcription of bone morphogenic proteins 2 and 4 in rat osteoblasts in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 250:458–461CrossRefPubMed
17.
Chakeres D, Bornstein R, Kangarlu A (2003) Randomized comparison of cognitive function in humans at 0 and 8 tesla. J Magn Res Imag 18:342–345CrossRef
18.
Akitt JW, Mann BE (2000) NMR and chemistry: an introduction to modern NMR spectroscopy, 4th edn. Stanley Thornes, Cheltenham
19.
Froböse I, Eckey U, Reiser M et al (2000) Evaluation of the effectiveness of three-dimensional pulsating electromagnetic fields in respect to the regeneration of cartilage structures. Orthoped Pract 36:510–515
20.
Digel I, Kurulgan E, Linder P et al (2007) Decrease in extracellular collagen crosslinking after NMR magnetic field application in skin fibroblasts. Med Biol Eng Comput 45:91–97CrossRefPubMed
21.
Steinecker-Frohnwieser B, Weigl LG, Höller C, Sipos E, Kullich W, Kress HG (2010) Modulation of VEGF and cytokines by the therapeutical nuclear magnetic resonance. In: Scientific presentation at the annual congress of the Austrian society of rheumatology and rehabilitation, Vienna 25–27 Nov 2010
22.
Steinecker-Frohnwieser B, Weigl LG, Höller C, Sipos E, Kullich W, Kress HG (2009) Influence of NMR therapy on metabolism of osteosarcoma- and chondrosarcoma cell lines. In: Scientific presentation at the 36th European symposium on calcified tissues, ECTS Congress, Vienna, May 23rd–27th 2009
23.
Steinecker-Frohnwieser B, Weigl L, Weberhofer G, Kress G (2014) The influence of nuclear magnetic resonance therapy (NMRT) and interleukin IL1-ß stimulation on Cal 78 chondrosarcoma cells and C28/I2 chondrocytes. J Orthoped Rheumatol 1(3):9–17
24.
Handschuh T, Melzer C (2008) Treatment of osteoporosis with MBST® Magnetic ResonanceTherapy. Orthodoc 5:14–17
25.
Fagerer N, Kullich W (2007) Use of magnetic resonance as new therapy options for Gonarthrosis. Arzt Praxis 927:180–182
26.
van Laack W, Levers A, Staat M (2013) Gonarthrosetherapie auf Kernspinresonanzbasis mit MBST-Vierjahresbeobachtungen. Orthop Nachr 07 (08)
27.
Kullich W, Ausserwinkler M (2008) Functional improvement in finger joint arthrosis by therapeutical use of magnetic resonance. Orthopädische Praxis 44(6):287–290
28.
Kullich W, Schwann H, Machreich K, Ausserwinkler M (2006) Additional outcome improvement in the rehabilitation of chronic low back pain after nuclear resonance therapy. J Rheumatologia 20:7–12
29.
Kullich W, Overbeck J, Spiegel HU (2013) One-year-survey with multicenter data of more than 4.500 patients with degenerative rheumatic diseases treated with therapeutic nuclear magnetic resonance. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 26(1):93–104PubMed
30.
Funke F (2010) Internet-based measurement with visual analogue scales. An experimental investigation. Dissertation, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
31.
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483CrossRefPubMed
32.
Bullinger M, Kirchberger I (1998) Der SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand (SF-36): Handbuch für die deutsch-sprachige Fragebogenversion. Hogrefe, Göttingen
33.
Wiesinger G, Nuhr M, Quittan M, Ebenbichler G, Wolfl G, Fiala-Moser V (1999) Crosscultural adaption of the Roland-Morris questionnaire for German-speaking patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1099–1103CrossRef
34.
Fardon DF, Milette PC (2001) Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(5):E93–E113CrossRef
35.
Borenstein D (2001) The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine to predict low back pain in asymptomatic subjects: a seven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1306–1311PubMed
36.
Weishaupt D (2000) Positional MRimaging of the lumbar spine: does it demonstrate nerve root compromise not visible at conventional MRimaging? Radiology 215:247–253CrossRefPubMed
37.
Roelofs PDDM, Deyo RA, Koes BW, Scholten RJPM, vanTulder MW (2008) Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain. An updated Cochrane review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(16):1766–1774CrossRef
38.
Benyamin R, Trescot AM, Datta S et al (2008) Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician 11:S105–S120PubMed
39.
Warner-Schmidt JL, Vanover KE, Chen EY, Marshall JJ, Greengard P (2011) Antidepressant effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are attenuated by antiinflammatory drugs in mice and humans. PNAS 108(22):9262–9267CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
40.
Tafazal S, Ng L, Chaudhary N, Sell P (2009) Corticosteroids in peri-radicular infiltration for radicular pain: a randomised double blind controlled trial. One year results and subgroup analysis. Eur Spine J 18:1220–1225CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
41.
42.
Nelson DA, Landau WM (2001) Intraspinal steroids: history, efficacy, accidentality and controversy with review of United States Food and Drug Administration reports. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 70:433–443CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
43.
Gangi A, Dietemann J-L, Mortazavi R, Pfleger D, Kauff C, Roy C (1998) CT-guided interventional procedures for pain management in the lumbosacral spine. Radiographics 18:621–633CrossRefPubMed
44.
Flavell SJ, Hou TZ, Lax S, Filer AD, Salmon M, Buckley CD (2008) Fibroblasts as novel therapeutical targets in chronic inflammation. Br J Pharmacol 153(S1):S241–S246CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
45.
Artus M, van der Windt DA, Jordan KP, Hay EM (2010) Low back pain symptoms show a similar pattern of improvement following a wide range of primary care treatments: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Rheumatology (Oxford) 49(12):2346–2356CrossRef
46.
47.
Steenstra IA, Verbeek JH, Heymans MW, Bongers PM (2005) Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature. Occup Environ Med 62:851–860CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
48.
Ritzwoller DP, Crounse L, Shetterly S, Roublee D (2006) The association of comorbidities, utilization, and costs for patients identified with low back pain. BMC Muscoskelet Disord 7:72CrossRef
49.
Jørgensen CK, Fink P, Olesen F (2000) Psychological distress and somatisation as prognostic factors in patients with musculoskeletal illness in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 50:537–541PubMedCentralPubMed
50.
Truchon M, Côté D, Schmouth ME et al (2010) Validation of an adaptation of the stress process model for predicting low back pain related long-term disability outcomes: a cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(13):1307–1315
51.
Salomonowitz G, Salfinger H, Hahne J, Friedrich M (2011) Impact of magnetic resonance therapy on sickness absence of patients with nerve root irritation following a lumbar disc problem. Z Orthop Unfall 149:575–581PubMed
52.
Katz JN (2006) Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Suppl 2):21–24CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Nuclear magnetic resonance therapy in lumbar disc herniation with lumbar radicular syndrome: effects of the intervention on pain intensity, health-related quality of life, disease-related disability, consumption of pain medication, duration of sick leave and MRI analysis
Authors
H. Salfinger
G. Salomonowitz
K. M. Friedrich
J. Hahne
J. Holzapfel
M. Friedrich
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3601-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

European Spine Journal 6/2015 Go to the issue

Original Article

Lumbo-pelvic related indexes: impact on adult spinal deformity surgery

Original Article

Cervical spine alignment following lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for sagittal imbalance

Original Article

Comparison of radiographic sagittal spinopelvic alignment between skeletally immature and skeletally mature individuals with Scheuermann’s disease

Original Article

Lumbo-femoral angle: a novel sagittal parameter related to quality of life in patients with adult scoliosis

Grand Rounds

Solid aneurysmal bone cyst on the cervical spine of a young child

Original Article

Using the modified Delphi method to establish a new Chinese clinical consensus of the treatments for cervical radiculopathy