Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 8/2011

01-08-2011 | Original Article

Validity of the 10-s step test: prospective study comparing it with the 10-s grip and release test and the 30-m walking test

Authors: Hiroaki Nakashima, Yasutsugu Yukawa, Keigo Ito, Masaaki Machino, Shunsuke Kanbara, Daigo Morita, Shiro Imagama, Nobuyuki Hamajima, Naoki Ishiguro, Fumihiko Kato

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 8/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Cervical compressive myelopathy (CCM) is one of the common neurological disorders seen in the geriatric population. The 10-s Grip and Release (“G and R”) Test and the 30-m Walking (“Walking”) Test are widely known as quantifiable physical assessments for the severity of cervical myelopathy. We developed the 10-s Step (“Step”) Test as another easily performable quantifiable measure for this. However, it is not clear if the Step test can adequately reveal the severity of myelopathy like the other established tests, given its simple method. The purpose of this study was to verify the practical effectiveness of this Step Test as a quantifiable parameter of CCM in comparison with the other two established tests. 168 consecutive patients with CCM were selected. Only 101 patients having >12-month postoperative follow-up were included. All were treated with cervical expansive laminoplasty. The three above mentioned quantitative tests and two assessment questionnaires (Japanese Orthopedic Association [JOA] Score, and lower-limb-function section of the Japanese Orthopedic Association cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire [JOACMEQ-L]) for CCM were prospectively administered, and the results of the three tests were evaluated using linear regression models to determine which quantitative test best reflected the results of the JOA score and JOACMEQ-L. Each quantitative test was carried out twice, just before and 1 year after surgery. The intraobserver reproducibility of the 10-s Step Test was found to be as high as that of the other tests both before and after surgery. Linear regression analyses showed that the results of the Step Test correlated with JOA scores to the same degree as the Walking Test results did, and to a greater degree than the G and R Test results did. Moreover, the results of the Step Test showed a significant degree of correlation with JOACMEQ-L. In view of these findings, our conclusion was that the easily performed Step Test is an useful test for assessing the severity of cervical myelopathy, especially for the lower limb dysfunction secondary to CCM.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bertalanffy H, Eggert HR (1989) Complications of anterior cervical discectomy without fusion in 450 consecutive patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 99:41–50CrossRef Bertalanffy H, Eggert HR (1989) Complications of anterior cervical discectomy without fusion in 450 consecutive patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 99:41–50CrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M et al (2007) An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): part 1. J Orthop Sci 12:227–240PubMedCrossRef Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M et al (2007) An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): part 1. J Orthop Sci 12:227–240PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M et al (2007) Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): part 2. Endorsement of the alternative item. J Orthop Sci 12:241–248PubMedCrossRef Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M et al (2007) Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): part 2. Endorsement of the alternative item. J Orthop Sci 12:241–248PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M et al (2008) Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): part 4. Establishment of equations for severity scores. Subcommittee on low back pain and cervical myelopathy, evaluation of the clinical outcome committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci 13:25–31PubMedCrossRef Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M et al (2008) Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): part 4. Establishment of equations for severity scores. Subcommittee on low back pain and cervical myelopathy, evaluation of the clinical outcome committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci 13:25–31PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y (1983) Expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine 8:693–699PubMedCrossRef Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y (1983) Expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine 8:693–699PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nurick S (1972) The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 95:87–100PubMedCrossRef Nurick S (1972) The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 95:87–100PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ono K, Ebara S, Fuji T, Yonenobu K, Fujiwara K, Yamashita K (1987) Myelopathy hand. New clinical signs of cervical cord damage. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:215–219PubMed Ono K, Ebara S, Fuji T, Yonenobu K, Fujiwara K, Yamashita K (1987) Myelopathy hand. New clinical signs of cervical cord damage. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:215–219PubMed
9.
go back to reference Ranawat CS, O’Leary P, Pellicci P, Tsairis P, Marchisello P, Dorr L (1979) Cervical spine fusion in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:1003–1010PubMed Ranawat CS, O’Leary P, Pellicci P, Tsairis P, Marchisello P, Dorr L (1979) Cervical spine fusion in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:1003–1010PubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Singh A, Crockard HA (1999) Quantitative assessment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy by a simple walking test. Lancet 354:370–373PubMedCrossRef Singh A, Crockard HA (1999) Quantitative assessment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy by a simple walking test. Lancet 354:370–373PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, Horie Y, Nakashima H, Masaaki M, Ito ZY, Wakao N (2009) “Ten second step test” as a new quantitative parameter of cervical myelopathy. Spine 34:82–86PubMedCrossRef Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, Horie Y, Nakashima H, Masaaki M, Ito ZY, Wakao N (2009) “Ten second step test” as a new quantitative parameter of cervical myelopathy. Spine 34:82–86PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Validity of the 10-s step test: prospective study comparing it with the 10-s grip and release test and the 30-m walking test
Authors
Hiroaki Nakashima
Yasutsugu Yukawa
Keigo Ito
Masaaki Machino
Shunsuke Kanbara
Daigo Morita
Shiro Imagama
Nobuyuki Hamajima
Naoki Ishiguro
Fumihiko Kato
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 8/2011
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1733-6

Other articles of this Issue 8/2011

European Spine Journal 8/2011 Go to the issue