Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2020

01-05-2020 | Care | Original Article

Exploring the perspectives of patients about their care experience: identifying what patients perceive are important qualities in cancer care

Authors: Margaret I. Fitch, Andrea C. Coronado, Julia C. Schippke, Jennifer Chadder, Esther Green

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Delivering person-centered care begins with understanding perspectives of individuals who are recipients of care about their experiences and what constitutes a “positive” experience.

Methods

This project explored views of individuals with cancer regarding their care experiences and identified aspects of care patients thought were important through a qualitative analysis of data from the Ambulatory Oncology Patient Satisfaction Survey (AOPSS). Permission was obtained from seven Canadian provinces to access de-identified written comments to a final open-ended question on the survey: Is there anything else you would like to tell us about your cancer care experience? The descriptive qualitative analysis was guided by two questions: (1) what is the nature of the written comments and (2) what are key ideas expressed about care experiences? Key ideas were collated across provinces to identify significant themes within the national sample.

Results

The sample included comments from 6232 individuals. A total of 42.5% comments were positive, 29.7% were negative, and 19.8% were mixed. Four broad themes were identified from the comments: (1) characteristics of a “positive” experience, (2) personal care, (3) interaction with health care providers, and (4) service delivery. Respondents cited being treated as a person with respect and dignity, clear communication, access to relevant and timely information, and care that takes their needs into account as important aspects. Communication, consistency, and ongoing interactions with staff were highlighted as essential elements of a positive experience, yet areas where improvements in care are necessary.

Conclusion

Patients reported a range of aspects that contribute to positive and negative care experiences which can be used to guide quality improvement initiatives in cancer centers. Results underscore the importance of having data collection systems in place to ensure agencies and providers have timely feedback about patients’ experiences and concerns in order to provide responsive and individualized care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine (US) (2001) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press, Washington Institute of Medicine (US) (2001) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press, Washington
2.
go back to reference Coulter A (2007) Evidence on the effectiveness of strategies to improve patients’ experience of cancer care. Picker Institute Europe, Oxford Coulter A (2007) Evidence on the effectiveness of strategies to improve patients’ experience of cancer care. Picker Institute Europe, Oxford
5.
go back to reference Darzi A (2008) High quality care for all: NHS next stage review final report. Department of Health, London Darzi A (2008) High quality care for all: NHS next stage review final report. Department of Health, London
9.
go back to reference O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ (2004) “Any other comments?” Open questions on questionnaires—a bane or a bonus to research? BMC Med Res Methodol 4:25CrossRef O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ (2004) “Any other comments?” Open questions on questionnaires—a bane or a bonus to research? BMC Med Res Methodol 4:25CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Corner J, Wagland R, Glaser A et al (2013) Qualitative analysis of patients’ feedback from a PROMs survey of cancer patients in England. BMJ Open 3:e002316CrossRef Corner J, Wagland R, Glaser A et al (2013) Qualitative analysis of patients’ feedback from a PROMs survey of cancer patients in England. BMJ Open 3:e002316CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Thorne S (2000) Data analysis in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs 3(3):68–70CrossRef Thorne S (2000) Data analysis in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs 3(3):68–70CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Institute for Healthcare Improvement (2003) The breakthrough series: IHI’s collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. In: IHI innovation series white paper. Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston Institute for Healthcare Improvement (2003) The breakthrough series: IHI’s collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. In: IHI innovation series white paper. Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston
17.
go back to reference Canadian Cancer Society (2003) Breaking down the barriers: study of cancer patient and caregiver needs in Ontario. Canadian Cancer Society, Toronto Canadian Cancer Society (2003) Breaking down the barriers: study of cancer patient and caregiver needs in Ontario. Canadian Cancer Society, Toronto
18.
go back to reference Canadian Strategy on Cancer Control (2002) Proceedings from the national stakeholder forum. Toronto, Ontario Canadian Strategy on Cancer Control (2002) Proceedings from the national stakeholder forum. Toronto, Ontario
19.
go back to reference Canadian Strategy on Cancer Control (2005) Proceedings from the national stakeholder forum. Aylmer, Quebec Canadian Strategy on Cancer Control (2005) Proceedings from the national stakeholder forum. Aylmer, Quebec
20.
go back to reference Fitch MI, Nicoll I, Keller-Olaman S (2007) Breast cancer information dissemination strategies--finding out what works. Can Oncol Nurs J 17(4):206–218CrossRef Fitch MI, Nicoll I, Keller-Olaman S (2007) Breast cancer information dissemination strategies--finding out what works. Can Oncol Nurs J 17(4):206–218CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Stewart J (2001) Towards a global definition of patient-centred care. BMJ 322(7284):444–445CrossRef Stewart J (2001) Towards a global definition of patient-centred care. BMJ 322(7284):444–445CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bakker DA, Fitch MI, Gray R, Reed E, Bennett J (2001) Patient-health care provider communication during chemotherapy treatment: the perspectives of women with breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns 43(1):61–71CrossRef Bakker DA, Fitch MI, Gray R, Reed E, Bennett J (2001) Patient-health care provider communication during chemotherapy treatment: the perspectives of women with breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns 43(1):61–71CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (2012) Screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: a guide to implementing best practices in person-centred care. Toronto, Ontario Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (2012) Screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: a guide to implementing best practices in person-centred care. Toronto, Ontario
24.
go back to reference Sullivan T, Evans W, Angus H, Hudson A (eds) (2003) Strengthening the quality of cancer services in Ontario. Canadian Healthcare Association Press, Toronto Sullivan T, Evans W, Angus H, Hudson A (eds) (2003) Strengthening the quality of cancer services in Ontario. Canadian Healthcare Association Press, Toronto
26.
go back to reference Bakker DA, DesRochers C, McChesney C, Fitch M, Bennett J (2001) Community cancer clinics: patients’ perspectives. Support Care Cancer 9(4):234–240CrossRef Bakker DA, DesRochers C, McChesney C, Fitch M, Bennett J (2001) Community cancer clinics: patients’ perspectives. Support Care Cancer 9(4):234–240CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Howell D, Bultz B, Fitch M, Groff S, Williams A, Cleghorn L (2012) Ensuring a high-quality response to screening for distress data. Oncology Exchange 11(3):2–8 Howell D, Bultz B, Fitch M, Groff S, Williams A, Cleghorn L (2012) Ensuring a high-quality response to screening for distress data. Oncology Exchange 11(3):2–8
Metadata
Title
Exploring the perspectives of patients about their care experience: identifying what patients perceive are important qualities in cancer care
Authors
Margaret I. Fitch
Andrea C. Coronado
Julia C. Schippke
Jennifer Chadder
Esther Green
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Care
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05057-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine