Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2004

Open Access 01-12-2004 | Debate

"Any other comments?" Open questions on questionnaires – a bane or a bonus to research?

Authors: Alicia O'Cathain, Kate J Thomas

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The habitual "any other comments" general open question at the end of structured questionnaires has the potential to increase response rates, elaborate responses to closed questions, and allow respondents to identify new issues not captured in the closed questions. However, we believe that many researchers have collected such data and failed to analyse or present it.

Discussion

General open questions at the end of structured questionnaires can present a problem because of their uncomfortable status of being strictly neither qualitative nor quantitative data, the consequent lack of clarity around how to analyse and report them, and the time and expertise needed to do so. We suggest that the value of these questions can be optimised if researchers start with a clear understanding of the type of data they wish to generate from such a question, and employ an appropriate strategy when designing the study. The intention can be to generate depth data or 'stories' from purposively defined groups of respondents for qualitative analysis, or to produce quantifiable data, representative of the population sampled, as a 'safety net' to identify issues which might complement the closed questions.

Summary

We encourage researchers to consider developing a more strategic use of general open questions at the end of structured questionnaires. This may optimise the quality of the data and the analysis, reduce dilemmas regarding whether and how to analyse such data, and result in a more ethical approach to making best use of the data which respondents kindly provide.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Crombie IK, Davies HTO: Research in Health Care. A practical approach to the design, conduct and interpretation of health services research. 1996, Chichester: John Wiley Crombie IK, Davies HTO: Research in Health Care. A practical approach to the design, conduct and interpretation of health services research. 1996, Chichester: John Wiley
2.
go back to reference Fink A, Kosecoff J: How to conduct surveys. A step by step guide. 1996, London: Sage Publications Fink A, Kosecoff J: How to conduct surveys. A step by step guide. 1996, London: Sage Publications
3.
go back to reference Moser CA, Kalton G: Survey methods in social investigation. 1971, England: Dartmouth Publishing Company Moser CA, Kalton G: Survey methods in social investigation. 1971, England: Dartmouth Publishing Company
4.
go back to reference Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB: Handbook of survey research. 1983, London: Academic Press Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB: Handbook of survey research. 1983, London: Academic Press
5.
go back to reference McColl E, Jacoby A, Thomas L, Soutter J, Bamford C, Steen N, Thomas R, Harvey E, Garratt A, Bond J: Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technol Assess. 2001, 5 (31): 1-256.CrossRefPubMed McColl E, Jacoby A, Thomas L, Soutter J, Bamford C, Steen N, Thomas R, Harvey E, Garratt A, Bond J: Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technol Assess. 2001, 5 (31): 1-256.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Oppenheim AN: Questionnaire design and attitude measurement. 1966, Aldershot: Gower Oppenheim AN: Questionnaire design and attitude measurement. 1966, Aldershot: Gower
7.
go back to reference Morrell J, Munro J, O'Cathain A, Warren K, Nicholl J: Impact of NHS Direct on other services: the characteristics and origins of its nurses. Emerg Med J. 2002, 19: 337-40. 10.1136/emj.19.4.337.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morrell J, Munro J, O'Cathain A, Warren K, Nicholl J: Impact of NHS Direct on other services: the characteristics and origins of its nurses. Emerg Med J. 2002, 19: 337-40. 10.1136/emj.19.4.337.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Knowles E, O'Cathain A, Morrell J, Munro JF, Nicholl JP: NHS Direct and nurses – opportunity or monotony?. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002, 39: 857-866. 10.1016/S0020-7489(02)00025-1.CrossRefPubMed Knowles E, O'Cathain A, Morrell J, Munro JF, Nicholl JP: NHS Direct and nurses – opportunity or monotony?. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002, 39: 857-866. 10.1016/S0020-7489(02)00025-1.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference O'Cathain A, Munro JF, Knowles E, Nicholl JP: How helpful is NHS Direct? Postal survey of callers. B M J. 2000, 320: 1035-CrossRef O'Cathain A, Munro JF, Knowles E, Nicholl JP: How helpful is NHS Direct? Postal survey of callers. B M J. 2000, 320: 1035-CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Goldacre MJ, Lambert T, Evans J, Turner G: Preregistration house officers' views on whether their experience at medical school prepared them well for their jobs: national questionnaire survey. B M J. 2003, 326: 1011-2.CrossRef Goldacre MJ, Lambert T, Evans J, Turner G: Preregistration house officers' views on whether their experience at medical school prepared them well for their jobs: national questionnaire survey. B M J. 2003, 326: 1011-2.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference O'Cathain A, Turner J, Nicholl JP: The acceptability of an emergency medical dispatch system to people who call 999 to request an ambulance. Emerg Med J. 2002, 19: 160-163. 10.1136/emj.19.2.160.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral O'Cathain A, Turner J, Nicholl JP: The acceptability of an emergency medical dispatch system to people who call 999 to request an ambulance. Emerg Med J. 2002, 19: 160-163. 10.1136/emj.19.2.160.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Goldacre MJ, Evans J, Lambert TW: Media criticism of doctors: review of UK junior doctors' concerns raised in surveys. B M J. 2003, 326: 629-630.CrossRef Goldacre MJ, Evans J, Lambert TW: Media criticism of doctors: review of UK junior doctors' concerns raised in surveys. B M J. 2003, 326: 629-630.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Boynton PM, Greenhalgh T: Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. B M J. 2004, 328: 1312-5.CrossRef Boynton PM, Greenhalgh T: Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. B M J. 2004, 328: 1312-5.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Steckler A, Mcleroy KR, Goodman RM, Bird ST, McCormick L: Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: an introduction. Health Educ Q. 1992, 19: 1-8.CrossRefPubMed Steckler A, Mcleroy KR, Goodman RM, Bird ST, McCormick L: Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: an introduction. Health Educ Q. 1992, 19: 1-8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bankauskaite V, Saarelma O: Why are people dissatisfied with medical care services in Lithuania? A qualitative study using responses to open-ended questions. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003, 15: 23-29. 10.1093/intqhc/15.1.23.CrossRefPubMed Bankauskaite V, Saarelma O: Why are people dissatisfied with medical care services in Lithuania? A qualitative study using responses to open-ended questions. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003, 15: 23-29. 10.1093/intqhc/15.1.23.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Boulton M, Fitzpatrick R, Swinburn C: Qualitative research in health care: II. A structured review and evaluation of studies. J Eval Clin Pract. 1996, 2: 171-179.CrossRefPubMed Boulton M, Fitzpatrick R, Swinburn C: Qualitative research in health care: II. A structured review and evaluation of studies. J Eval Clin Pract. 1996, 2: 171-179.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P: Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 1998, 2 (16): Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P: Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 1998, 2 (16):
18.
go back to reference Cassidy CM: Chinese medicine users in the United States Part II: Preferred aspects of care. J Altern Complement Med. 1998, 4: 189-202.CrossRefPubMed Cassidy CM: Chinese medicine users in the United States Part II: Preferred aspects of care. J Altern Complement Med. 1998, 4: 189-202.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lincoln YS, Guba EG: Naturalistic inquiry. 1985, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Lincoln YS, Guba EG: Naturalistic inquiry. 1985, Newbury Park, CA: Sage
20.
go back to reference Patton MQ: Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 1990, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, Second Patton MQ: Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 1990, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, Second
21.
go back to reference Mays N, Pope C: Quality in qualitative health research. In Qualitative Research in Health Care. Edited by: Pope C, Mays N. 2000, London: BMJ Publishing Group, 89-101. 2 Mays N, Pope C: Quality in qualitative health research. In Qualitative Research in Health Care. Edited by: Pope C, Mays N. 2000, London: BMJ Publishing Group, 89-101. 2
22.
go back to reference Seale C, Silverman D: Ensuring rigour in qualitative research. Eur J Public Health. 1997, 7: 379-84. 10.1093/eurpub/7.4.379.CrossRef Seale C, Silverman D: Ensuring rigour in qualitative research. Eur J Public Health. 1997, 7: 379-84. 10.1093/eurpub/7.4.379.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Thomas LH, McColl E, Priest J, Bond S: Open-ended questions: do they add anything to a quantitative patient satisfaction scale?. Social Sciences in Health. 1996, 2: 23-35. Thomas LH, McColl E, Priest J, Bond S: Open-ended questions: do they add anything to a quantitative patient satisfaction scale?. Social Sciences in Health. 1996, 2: 23-35.
24.
go back to reference Bazeley P: Computerised data analysis for mixed methods research. In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioural Research. Edited by: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. 2003, London: Sage Publications, 385-422. Bazeley P: Computerised data analysis for mixed methods research. In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioural Research. Edited by: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. 2003, London: Sage Publications, 385-422.
25.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Spencer L: Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Analysing qualitative data. Edited by: Bryman A, Burgess RG. 1994, London: Routledge, 173-194.CrossRef Ritchie J, Spencer L: Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Analysing qualitative data. Edited by: Bryman A, Burgess RG. 1994, London: Routledge, 173-194.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Malin M, Hemminki E, Räikkönen O, Sihovo S, Perälä M-L: What do women want? Women's experiences of infertility treatment. Soc SciMed. 2001, 53: 123-133. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00317-8. Malin M, Hemminki E, Räikkönen O, Sihovo S, Perälä M-L: What do women want? Women's experiences of infertility treatment. Soc SciMed. 2001, 53: 123-133. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00317-8.
27.
go back to reference Collins D: Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res. 2003, 12: 229-238. 10.1023/A:1023254226592.CrossRefPubMed Collins D: Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res. 2003, 12: 229-238. 10.1023/A:1023254226592.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
"Any other comments?" Open questions on questionnaires – a bane or a bonus to research?
Authors
Alicia O'Cathain
Kate J Thomas
Publication date
01-12-2004
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2004
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-25

Other articles of this Issue 1/2004

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2004 Go to the issue