Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Original Article

Personalised and progressive neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in patients with cancer—a clinical case series

Authors: Dominic O’Connor, Matilde Mora Fernandez, Gabriel Signorelli, Pedro Valero, Brian Caulfield

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may be a pragmatic short-term alternative to voluntary exercise to augment cancer rehabilitation. However, previous attempts to use NMES as an exercise modality in this cohort have been unsuccessful, largely due to the use of NMES protocols that were developed for other rehabilitation contexts. We assessed the effects of a personalised and progressive NMES exercise intervention, designed with early-stage cancer rehabilitation in mind, on exercise capacity, lower body functional strength and quality of life in (QoL) in patients who are currently undergoing or have recently completed treatment for cancer.

Methods

Ten adult patients were recruited. A personalised and progressive NMES exercise intervention was implemented in each case over a 4–8-week period. The 30-s sit-to-stand test (STS), 6-min walk test (6MWT) and EORTC QLQ C-30 were performed pre- and post-intervention. Patients completed semi-structured interviews post-intervention to explore their experiences and views on the intervention and its impact on their daily lives.

Results

Six of the 10 recruited patients completed the intervention and completed pre-and post-assessments. Four of 6 patients improved STS, 5 of 6 patients improved 6MWT and 4 of 6 patients improved Global QoL. Perceived benefits included improved muscle strength and more confidence when walking.

Conclusion

A personalised and progressive NMES exercise intervention appears safe and may improve functional capacity and QoL in adults who are undergoing or have recently completed treatment for cancer. Replication of these results in a controlled prospective study is warranted prior to clinical implementation.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Spence RR, Heesch KC, Brown WJ (2010) Exercise and cancer rehabilitation: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 36:185–194CrossRefPubMed Spence RR, Heesch KC, Brown WJ (2010) Exercise and cancer rehabilitation: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 36:185–194CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Galvão DA, Pinto BM, Irwin ML, Wolin KY, Segal RJ, Lucia A, Schneider CM, von Gruenigen V, Schwartz AL, American College of Sports Medicine (2010) American college of sports medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42:1409–1426CrossRef Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Galvão DA, Pinto BM, Irwin ML, Wolin KY, Segal RJ, Lucia A, Schneider CM, von Gruenigen V, Schwartz AL, American College of Sports Medicine (2010) American college of sports medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42:1409–1426CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Minogue CM, Caulfield BM, Reilly RB (2007) What are the electrical stimulation design parameters for maximum VO 2 aimed at cardio-pulmonary rehabilitation? In: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings pp 2428–2431 Minogue CM, Caulfield BM, Reilly RB (2007) What are the electrical stimulation design parameters for maximum VO 2 aimed at cardio-pulmonary rehabilitation? In: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings pp 2428–2431
16.
go back to reference Caulfield B, Crowe L, Coughlan G, Minogue C (2011) Clinical application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation induced cardiovascular exercise. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS pp 3266–3269 Caulfield B, Crowe L, Coughlan G, Minogue C (2011) Clinical application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation induced cardiovascular exercise. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS pp 3266–3269
19.
go back to reference Caulfield B, Prendergast A, Rainsford G, Minogue C (2013) Self directed home based electrical muscle stimulation training improves exercise tolerance and strength in healthy elderly. Conf Proc . Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Annu Conf 2013:7036–7039 . doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2013.6611178 Caulfield B, Prendergast A, Rainsford G, Minogue C (2013) Self directed home based electrical muscle stimulation training improves exercise tolerance and strength in healthy elderly. Conf Proc . Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Annu Conf 2013:7036–7039 . doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1109/​EMBC.​2013.​6611178
20.
go back to reference Neo J, Fettes L, Gao W, Higginson IJ, Maddocks M (2017) Disability in activities of daily living among adults with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 61:94–106CrossRefPubMed Neo J, Fettes L, Gao W, Higginson IJ, Maddocks M (2017) Disability in activities of daily living among adults with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 61:94–106CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Cenik F, Schoberwalter D, Keilani M, Maehr B, Wolzt M, Marhold M, Crevenna R (2016) Neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the thighs in cardiac patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Wien Klin Wochenschr 128:802–808CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cenik F, Schoberwalter D, Keilani M, Maehr B, Wolzt M, Marhold M, Crevenna R (2016) Neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the thighs in cardiac patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Wien Klin Wochenschr 128:802–808CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Maringwa J, Quinten C, King M, Ringash J, Osoba D, Coens C, Martinelli F, Reeve BB, Gotay C, Greimel E, Flechtner H, Cleeland CS, Schmucker-von Koch J, Weis J, van den Bent MJ, Stupp R, Taphoorn MJ, Bottomley A, on behalf of the EORTC PROBE Project and Brain Cancer Group (2011) Minimal clinically meaningful differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 scales in brain cancer patients. Ann Oncol 22:2107–2112. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdq726 CrossRefPubMed Maringwa J, Quinten C, King M, Ringash J, Osoba D, Coens C, Martinelli F, Reeve BB, Gotay C, Greimel E, Flechtner H, Cleeland CS, Schmucker-von Koch J, Weis J, van den Bent MJ, Stupp R, Taphoorn MJ, Bottomley A, on behalf of the EORTC PROBE Project and Brain Cancer Group (2011) Minimal clinically meaningful differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 scales in brain cancer patients. Ann Oncol 22:2107–2112. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​annonc/​mdq726 CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Bewarder M, Klostermann A, Ahlgrimm M, Bittenbring JT, Pfreundschuh M, Wagenpfeil S, Kaddu-Mulindwa D (2018) Safety and feasibility of electrical muscle stimulation in patients undergoing autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation or intensive chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4390-z Bewarder M, Klostermann A, Ahlgrimm M, Bittenbring JT, Pfreundschuh M, Wagenpfeil S, Kaddu-Mulindwa D (2018) Safety and feasibility of electrical muscle stimulation in patients undergoing autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation or intensive chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00520-018-4390-z
31.
go back to reference Bohannon RW, Crouch R (2017) Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 23:377–381CrossRefPubMed Bohannon RW, Crouch R (2017) Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 23:377–381CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Roig M, Reid WD (2009) Electrical stimulation and peripheral muscle function in COPD: a systematic review. Respir Med 103:485–495CrossRefPubMed Roig M, Reid WD (2009) Electrical stimulation and peripheral muscle function in COPD: a systematic review. Respir Med 103:485–495CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Amidei C, Kushner DS (2015) Clinical implications of motor deficits related to brain tumors†. Neuro-Oncol Pract 2:179–184CrossRef Amidei C, Kushner DS (2015) Clinical implications of motor deficits related to brain tumors†. Neuro-Oncol Pract 2:179–184CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Batchelor TT, Taylor LP, Thaler HT, Posner JB, DeAngelis LM (1997) Steroid myopathy in cancer patients. Neurology 48:1234–1238CrossRefPubMed Batchelor TT, Taylor LP, Thaler HT, Posner JB, DeAngelis LM (1997) Steroid myopathy in cancer patients. Neurology 48:1234–1238CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Personalised and progressive neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in patients with cancer—a clinical case series
Authors
Dominic O’Connor
Matilde Mora Fernandez
Gabriel Signorelli
Pedro Valero
Brian Caulfield
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04679-3

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine