Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2020

01-07-2020 | Cholecystitis | 2019 SAGES Oral

Early cholecystectomy (< 72 h) is associated with lower rate of complications and bile duct injury: a study of 109,862 cholecystectomies in the state of New York

Authors: Maria S. Altieri, L. Michael Brunt, Jie Yang, Chencan Zhu, Mark A. Talamini, Aurora D. Pryor

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The timing of cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis has been debated with most studies favoring early cholecystectomy (< 72 h of onset). However, most reported studies are from single institution studies with only a few population-based studies. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing cholecystectomy within 72 h of emergency department (ED) presentation to patients undergoing cholecystectomy following 72 h in a large statewide database.

Methods

The New York SPARCS administrative database was used to identify all adult patients presenting to the ED with a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis from 2005 to 2016. Patients aged < 18, missing data, or other biliary diagnoses were excluded from the analysis. Early cholecystectomy was defined as within 72 h of presentation to the emergency department. Early vs late groups were compared in terms of overall complications, bile duct injury (BDI), hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-days ED visits and readmissions. The linear trends of yearly early/late cholecystectomies were examined using a log-linear Poisson regression models. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to compare complications, BDI, and 30-day readmission/ED visits after controlling for confounding factors. Multivariable generalized linear regression for a negative binomial distributed count data was used to compare LOS.

Results

Following the application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria, there were 109,862 patients who presented to an ED with the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. The majority of patients underwent early cholecystectomy (n = 93,761, 85.3%), whereas only 16,101 patients underwent late cholecystectomy (14.7%). There was an increasing trend of early cholecystectomy from 2005 (81.1%) to 2016 (87.8%). On multivariable regression, patients with early cholecystectomy were less likely to have complications (OR 0.542, 95% CI 0.518–0.566), had shorter LOS (ratio 0.461, 95% CI 0.458–0.465), were less likely to have 30-day readmission (OR 0.871, 95% CI 0.816–0.928), 30-day ED visits (OR 0.909, 95% CI 0.862–0.959), and bile duct injury (OR 0.654, 95% CI 0.444–0.962) compared to late cholecystectomy patients.

Conclusion

Early cholecystectomy (< 72 h) is associated with fewer complications, specifically BDI, shorter LOS, and fewer 30-day readmissions and ED visits. For patients presenting to the ED for acute cholecystitis, early cholecystectomy should be preferred.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Teilum D (1989) The prevalence of gallstones in autopsies from a Danish urban area. Frederiksberg 1914–1955. Acta Chir Scand 155(2):103–106PubMed Teilum D (1989) The prevalence of gallstones in autopsies from a Danish urban area. Frederiksberg 1914–1955. Acta Chir Scand 155(2):103–106PubMed
2.
go back to reference Schirmer BD, Winters KL, Edlich RF (2005) Cholelithiasis and cholecystitis. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 15(3):329–338CrossRef Schirmer BD, Winters KL, Edlich RF (2005) Cholelithiasis and cholecystitis. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 15(3):329–338CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Truven Health Analytics (Thomson/Solucient) (2014) USA procedure volumes Truven Health Analytics (Thomson/Solucient) (2014) USA procedure volumes
4.
go back to reference Calland JF, Tanaka K, Foley E et al (2001) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: patient outcomes after implementation of a clinical pathway. Ann Surg 233(5):704–715CrossRef Calland JF, Tanaka K, Foley E et al (2001) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: patient outcomes after implementation of a clinical pathway. Ann Surg 233(5):704–715CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shea JA, Berlin JA, Bachwich DR, Staroscik RN, Malet PF, McGuckin M (1998) Indications for and outcomes of cholecystectomy: a comparison of the pre and postlaparoscopic eras. Ann Surg 227(3):343–350CrossRef Shea JA, Berlin JA, Bachwich DR, Staroscik RN, Malet PF, McGuckin M (1998) Indications for and outcomes of cholecystectomy: a comparison of the pre and postlaparoscopic eras. Ann Surg 227(3):343–350CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lillemoe KD, Lin JW, Talamini MA, Yeo CJ, Snyder DS, Parker SD (1999) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a “true” outpatient procedure: initial experience in 130 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg 3(1):44–49CrossRef Lillemoe KD, Lin JW, Talamini MA, Yeo CJ, Snyder DS, Parker SD (1999) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a “true” outpatient procedure: initial experience in 130 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg 3(1):44–49CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Giger UF, Michel JM, Opitz I, Th Inderbitzin D, Kocher T, Krähenbühl L (2006) Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database. J Am Coll Surg 203(5):723–728CrossRef Giger UF, Michel JM, Opitz I, Th Inderbitzin D, Kocher T, Krähenbühl L (2006) Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database. J Am Coll Surg 203(5):723–728CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Murphy MM, Ng SC, Simons JP, Csikesz NG, Shah SA, Tseng JF (2010) Predictors of major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgeon, hospital, or patient? J Am Coll Surg 211(1):73–80CrossRef Murphy MM, Ng SC, Simons JP, Csikesz NG, Shah SA, Tseng JF (2010) Predictors of major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgeon, hospital, or patient? J Am Coll Surg 211(1):73–80CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hadad SM, Vaidya JS, Baker L et al (2007) Delay from symptom onset increases the conversion rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. World J Surg 31:1298–1301CrossRef Hadad SM, Vaidya JS, Baker L et al (2007) Delay from symptom onset increases the conversion rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. World J Surg 31:1298–1301CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cao AM, Eslick GD, Cox MR (2015) Early cholecystectomy is superior to delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 19(5):848–857CrossRef Cao AM, Eslick GD, Cox MR (2015) Early cholecystectomy is superior to delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 19(5):848–857CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49(12):1373–1379CrossRef Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49(12):1373–1379CrossRef
12.
go back to reference de Mestral C, Hoch JS, Laupacis A et al (2016) Early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis offers the best outcomes at the least cost: a model-based cost-utility analysis. J Am Coll Surg 222(2):185–194CrossRef de Mestral C, Hoch JS, Laupacis A et al (2016) Early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis offers the best outcomes at the least cost: a model-based cost-utility analysis. J Am Coll Surg 222(2):185–194CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Polo M, Duclos A, Polazzi S et al (2015) Acute cholecystitis-optimal timing for early cholecystectomy: a French Nationwide Study. J Gastrointest Surg 19(11):2003–2010CrossRef Polo M, Duclos A, Polazzi S et al (2015) Acute cholecystitis-optimal timing for early cholecystectomy: a French Nationwide Study. J Gastrointest Surg 19(11):2003–2010CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Blohm M, Österberg J, Sandblom G, Lundell L, Hedberg M, Enochsson L (2017) The sooner, the better? The importance of optimal timing of cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: data from the national swedish registry for gallstone surgery, GallRiks. J Gastrointest Surg 21(1):33–40CrossRef Blohm M, Österberg J, Sandblom G, Lundell L, Hedberg M, Enochsson L (2017) The sooner, the better? The importance of optimal timing of cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: data from the national swedish registry for gallstone surgery, GallRiks. J Gastrointest Surg 21(1):33–40CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Roulin D, Saadi A, Di Mare L, Demartines N, Halkic N (2016) Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, are the 72 hours still the rule? A randomized trial. Ann Surg 264(5):717–722CrossRef Roulin D, Saadi A, Di Mare L, Demartines N, Halkic N (2016) Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, are the 72 hours still the rule? A randomized trial. Ann Surg 264(5):717–722CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gutt CN, Encke J, Köninger J et al (2013) Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304). Ann Surg 258(3):385–393CrossRef Gutt CN, Encke J, Köninger J et al (2013) Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304). Ann Surg 258(3):385–393CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Early cholecystectomy (< 72 h) is associated with lower rate of complications and bile duct injury: a study of 109,862 cholecystectomies in the state of New York
Authors
Maria S. Altieri
L. Michael Brunt
Jie Yang
Chencan Zhu
Mark A. Talamini
Aurora D. Pryor
Publication date
01-07-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07049-6

Other articles of this Issue 7/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2020 Go to the issue