Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 5/2015

01-05-2015 | Original Article

Early Cholecystectomy Is Superior to Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: a Meta-analysis

Authors: Amy M. Cao, Guy D. Eslick, Michael R. Cox

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis remains an issue for debate amongst general surgeons. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. The primary outcome measures included mortality rates, complication rates, length of hospital stay and conversion rates to open procedures.

Materials and Methods

A search of electronic databases was performed for randomised controlled trials. Fifteen studies were included.

Results

Early surgery has a decreased risk of wound infections (RR 0.57, 95 % CI 0.35–0.93, p = 0.01) compared with delayed surgery but no difference in mortality, bile duct injuries, bile duct leaks and the risk of conversion to open surgery. Of patients in the delayed group, 9.7 % failed initial non-operative management and underwent emergency LC. Early surgery had a significantly reduced total hospital stay and mean hospital costs compared with delayed surgery.

Conclusion

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis demonstrated decreased incidence of wound infections, a shorter total length of stay and decreased costs with no difference in the rates of mortality, bile duct injuries, bile leaks and conversions. These results support that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the best care and should be considered a routine in patients presenting with acute cholecystitis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kolla SB, Aggarwal S, Kumar A, Kumar R, Chumber S, Parshad R, Seenu V. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2004; 18:1323-1327.CrossRefPubMed Kolla SB, Aggarwal S, Kumar A, Kumar R, Chumber S, Parshad R, Seenu V. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2004; 18:1323-1327.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Serralta AS, Bueno JL, Planells MR, Rodero DR. Prospective evaluation of emergency versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for early cholecystitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2003; 13:71-75.CrossRefPubMed Serralta AS, Bueno JL, Planells MR, Rodero DR. Prospective evaluation of emergency versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for early cholecystitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2003; 13:71-75.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Siddiqui T, MacDonald A, Chong PS, Jenkins JT. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. American Journal of Surgery 2008; 195(1): 40-47.CrossRefPubMed Siddiqui T, MacDonald A, Chong PS, Jenkins JT. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. American Journal of Surgery 2008; 195(1): 40-47.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Yamashita Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y, Nimura Y, Hirota M, Miura F, Mayumi T, Yoshida M, Strasberg S, Pitt HA, Santibanes ED, Belghiti J, Buchler MW, Gouma DJ, Fan ST, Hilvano SC, Lau JWY, Kim SW, Belli G, Windsor JA, Liau KH, Sachakul V. Surgical treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2007; 14:91-7CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Yamashita Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y, Nimura Y, Hirota M, Miura F, Mayumi T, Yoshida M, Strasberg S, Pitt HA, Santibanes ED, Belghiti J, Buchler MW, Gouma DJ, Fan ST, Hilvano SC, Lau JWY, Kim SW, Belli G, Windsor JA, Liau KH, Sachakul V. Surgical treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2007; 14:91-7CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cameron IC, Chadwick C, Phillips J, Johnson AG. Management of acute cholecystitis in UK hospitals: time for a change. Postgrad Med J. 2004; 80:292–4.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Cameron IC, Chadwick C, Phillips J, Johnson AG. Management of acute cholecystitis in UK hospitals: time for a change. Postgrad Med J. 2004; 80:292–4.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
6.
go back to reference Senapati PS, Bhattarcharya D, Harinath G, Ammori BJ. A survey of the timing and approach to the surgical management of cholelithiasis in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis and acute cholecystitis in the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2003; 85: 306-312.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Senapati PS, Bhattarcharya D, Harinath G, Ammori BJ. A survey of the timing and approach to the surgical management of cholelithiasis in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis and acute cholecystitis in the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2003; 85: 306-312.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sankarankutty A, Luz LT, Campos T, Rizoli S, Fraga GP, Nascimento Jr B. Uncomplicated acute cholecystitis: early or delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Rev Col Bras Cir. 2012; 39(5): 436-440.CrossRefPubMed Sankarankutty A, Luz LT, Campos T, Rizoli S, Fraga GP, Nascimento Jr B. Uncomplicated acute cholecystitis: early or delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Rev Col Bras Cir. 2012; 39(5): 436-440.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lau H, Lo CY, Patil NG, Yuen WK. Early versus delayed-interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20(1): 82-7.CrossRefPubMed Lau H, Lo CY, Patil NG, Yuen WK. Early versus delayed-interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20(1): 82-7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cox MR, Wilson TG, Luck AJ, Jeans PL, Padbury RT, Toouli J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder. Ann Surg. 1993; 218: 630–4.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Cox MR, Wilson TG, Luck AJ, Jeans PL, Padbury RT, Toouli J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder. Ann Surg. 1993; 218: 630–4.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
11.
go back to reference Verma S, Agarwal PN, Bali RS, Singh R, Talwar N. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial. ISRN Minim Invasive Surg 2013; vol 2013, Article ID 486107. doi:10.1155/2013/486107 Verma S, Agarwal PN, Bali RS, Singh R, Talwar N. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial. ISRN Minim Invasive Surg 2013; vol 2013, Article ID 486107. doi:10.​1155/​2013/​486107
12.
go back to reference Miller RE, Kimmelsteil FM. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 1993; 7:296–299.CrossRefPubMed Miller RE, Kimmelsteil FM. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 1993; 7:296–299.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rattner DW, Ferguson C, Warshaw AL. Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 1993; 217:233–236.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Rattner DW, Ferguson C, Warshaw AL. Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 1993; 217:233–236.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gutt CN, Encke, J, Koninger J, Harnoss JC, Weigand K, Kipfmuller K, Schunter O, Gotze T, Golling MT, Menges M, Klar E, Feilhauer K, Wolfram GZ, Ridwelski K, Ackmann S, Baron A, Schon MR, Seitz HK, Daniel D, Stremmel W, Buchler MW. Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial. Ann Surg 2013; 258(3):385-93.CrossRefPubMed Gutt CN, Encke, J, Koninger J, Harnoss JC, Weigand K, Kipfmuller K, Schunter O, Gotze T, Golling MT, Menges M, Klar E, Feilhauer K, Wolfram GZ, Ridwelski K, Ackmann S, Baron A, Schon MR, Seitz HK, Daniel D, Stremmel W, Buchler MW. Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial. Ann Surg 2013; 258(3):385-93.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gul R, Dar RA, Sheikh RA, Salroo NA, Matoo AR, Wani SH. Comparison of early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: experience from a single center. N Am J Med Sci 2014; 5(7):414-18. Gul R, Dar RA, Sheikh RA, Salroo NA, Matoo AR, Wani SH. Comparison of early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: experience from a single center. N Am J Med Sci 2014; 5(7):414-18.
16.
go back to reference Gurusamy K, Samraj K, Gluud C, Wilson E, Davidson BR. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2010; 97: 141–150. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6870 CrossRefPubMed Gurusamy K, Samraj K, Gluud C, Wilson E, Davidson BR. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2010; 97: 141–150. doi: 10.​1002/​bjs.​6870 CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151:264-269.CrossRefPubMed Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151:264-269.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Ghani AA, Haq A. Acute cholecystitis: immediate versus interval cholecystectomy. Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute 2005; 19(2):192–5. Ghani AA, Haq A. Acute cholecystitis: immediate versus interval cholecystectomy. Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute 2005; 19(2):192–5.
20.
go back to reference Yadav RP, Adhikary S, Agrawal CS, Bhattarai B, Gupta RK, Ghimire A. A comparative study of early vs. delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2009;7(25):16-20. Yadav RP, Adhikary S, Agrawal CS, Bhattarai B, Gupta RK, Ghimire A. A comparative study of early vs. delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2009;7(25):16-20.
22.
go back to reference Faizi KS, Ahmed I, Ahmad H. Comparison of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy: choosing the best. PJM 2013; 7(1):212-5. Faizi KS, Ahmed I, Ahmad H. Comparison of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy: choosing the best. PJM 2013; 7(1):212-5.
23.
go back to reference Ozkardes AB, Tokaz M, Dumlu EG, Bozkurt B, Ciftci AB, Yetisir F, Kilic M. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized study. Int Surg 2014; 99(1):56-61.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Ozkardes AB, Tokaz M, Dumlu EG, Bozkurt B, Ciftci AB, Yetisir F, Kilic M. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized study. Int Surg 2014; 99(1):56-61.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
24.
25.
go back to reference Yates F. Contingency tables involving small numbers and the x2 test. J R Stat Soc. 1934; 1(2):217-235 Yates F. Contingency tables involving small numbers and the x2 test. J R Stat Soc. 1934; 1(2):217-235
26.
go back to reference Haviland MG. Yates’s correction for continuity and analysis of 2 x 2 contingency tables. Stat Med. 1990; 9:363-7CrossRefPubMed Haviland MG. Yates’s correction for continuity and analysis of 2 x 2 contingency tables. Stat Med. 1990; 9:363-7CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Walter SD. Point estimation of the odds ratio in sparse 2 x 2 contingency tables. Biostatistics. 1987; 71-102 Walter SD. Point estimation of the odds ratio in sparse 2 x 2 contingency tables. Biostatistics. 1987; 71-102
29.
go back to reference Egger M, Davey S, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br Med J. 1997; 315:629-34.CrossRef Egger M, Davey S, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br Med J. 1997; 315:629-34.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Orwin R. A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. JSE. 1983; 8:157-159. Orwin R. A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. JSE. 1983; 8:157-159.
31.
go back to reference Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds JM, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Controlled Clin Trials. 1996; 17:1-12.CrossRefPubMed Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds JM, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Controlled Clin Trials. 1996; 17:1-12.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Dixon E, Fowler D, Ghitulescu G. Cost-utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. J Can Chir. 2012; 55(3):204-6 Dixon E, Fowler D, Ghitulescu G. Cost-utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. J Can Chir. 2012; 55(3):204-6
33.
go back to reference Johner A, Raymakers A, Wiseman SM. Cost utility of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc. 2012; 27(1):256-62.CrossRefPubMed Johner A, Raymakers A, Wiseman SM. Cost utility of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc. 2012; 27(1):256-62.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Macafee DA, Humes DJ, Bouliotis G, Beckingham IJ, Whynes DK, Lobo DN. Prospective randomized trial using cost-utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder disease. BJS. 2009; 96(9):1031–40.CrossRef Macafee DA, Humes DJ, Bouliotis G, Beckingham IJ, Whynes DK, Lobo DN. Prospective randomized trial using cost-utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder disease. BJS. 2009; 96(9):1031–40.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Khan SSA. Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, a prospective randomized study. Pak J of Gastroenterol. 2002; 16(2):30–4. Khan SSA. Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, a prospective randomized study. Pak J of Gastroenterol. 2002; 16(2):30–4.
37.
go back to reference Javed I, Fahim M, Malik NA, Khan MS, Adalat I, Khan JS, Khan M. Evaluation of early urgent versus delayed urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. JRMC. 2013; 17(2):185-188 Javed I, Fahim M, Malik NA, Khan MS, Adalat I, Khan JS, Khan M. Evaluation of early urgent versus delayed urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. JRMC. 2013; 17(2):185-188
40.
go back to reference Lai PBS, Kwong KH, Leung KL. Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. BJS. 1998; 85(6):764–7.CrossRef Lai PBS, Kwong KH, Leung KL. Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. BJS. 1998; 85(6):764–7.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Lo C, Liu C, Fan S, Lai ECS, Wong J. Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg. 1998; 227(4):461–7.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Lo C, Liu C, Fan S, Lai ECS, Wong J. Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg. 1998; 227(4):461–7.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
42.
go back to reference Davila D, Manzanares C, Picho ML, Albors P, Cardenas F, Fuster E, Trullenque R. Experience in the treatment (early vs. delayed) of acute cholecystitis via laparoscopy. Cir Esp. 1999; 66(Suppl 1):233. Davila D, Manzanares C, Picho ML, Albors P, Cardenas F, Fuster E, Trullenque R. Experience in the treatment (early vs. delayed) of acute cholecystitis via laparoscopy. Cir Esp. 1999; 66(Suppl 1):233.
43.
go back to reference Chandler CF, Lane JS, Ferguson P, Thompson JE, Ashley SW. Prospective evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Am Surgeon. 2000; 66(9):896–900.PubMed Chandler CF, Lane JS, Ferguson P, Thompson JE, Ashley SW. Prospective evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Am Surgeon. 2000; 66(9):896–900.PubMed
44.
go back to reference Johansson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003; 7:642–645.CrossRefPubMed Johansson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003; 7:642–645.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Johansson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Impact of choice of therapeutic strategy for acute cholecystitis on patient’s health-related quality of life. Results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Dig Surg. 2004; 21:359–362.CrossRefPubMed Johansson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Impact of choice of therapeutic strategy for acute cholecystitis on patient’s health-related quality of life. Results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Dig Surg. 2004; 21:359–362.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Saber A, Hokkam EN. Operative outcome and patient satisfaction in early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Minimally invasive surgery. 2014; 1-4 Saber A, Hokkam EN. Operative outcome and patient satisfaction in early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Minimally invasive surgery. 2014; 1-4
47.
go back to reference Sahajpal AK, Chow SC, Dixon E, Greig PD, Gallinger S, Wei AC. Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 2010; 145(8):757-63CrossRefPubMed Sahajpal AK, Chow SC, Dixon E, Greig PD, Gallinger S, Wei AC. Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 2010; 145(8):757-63CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Pekolj J, Alvarez FA, Palavecino M, Claria RS, Mazza O, de Santibanes E. Intraoperative management and repair of bile duct injuries sustained during 10,123 laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a high volume referral center. J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 216:894-901.CrossRefPubMed Pekolj J, Alvarez FA, Palavecino M, Claria RS, Mazza O, de Santibanes E. Intraoperative management and repair of bile duct injuries sustained during 10,123 laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a high volume referral center. J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 216:894-901.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Strasberg SM. Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: part 1. Processes used in determination of standard of care in misidentification injuries. J Am Coll Surg. 2005; 201:598.CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM. Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: part 1. Processes used in determination of standard of care in misidentification injuries. J Am Coll Surg. 2005; 201:598.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Strasberg SM. Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: part 2. Changing the culture of cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2005; 201:604.CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM. Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: part 2. Changing the culture of cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2005; 201:604.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Ghassemi KF, Shah JN. Postoperative bile duct injuries. Tech Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 8:81-91.CrossRef Ghassemi KF, Shah JN. Postoperative bile duct injuries. Tech Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 8:81-91.CrossRef
52.
53.
go back to reference Sobolev B, Mercer D, Brown P, FitzGerald M, Jalink D, Shaw R. Risk of emergency admission while awaiting elective cholecystectomy. CMAJ. 2003; 169(7)662-5.PubMedCentralPubMed Sobolev B, Mercer D, Brown P, FitzGerald M, Jalink D, Shaw R. Risk of emergency admission while awaiting elective cholecystectomy. CMAJ. 2003; 169(7)662-5.PubMedCentralPubMed
54.
go back to reference Parasyn AD, Truskett PG, Bennett M, Lum S, Barry J, Haghighi K, Crowe PJ. Acute-care surgical service: a change in culture. ANZ J Surg. 2009; 79(1-2):12-8.CrossRefPubMed Parasyn AD, Truskett PG, Bennett M, Lum S, Barry J, Haghighi K, Crowe PJ. Acute-care surgical service: a change in culture. ANZ J Surg. 2009; 79(1-2):12-8.CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Wilson E, Gurusamy K, Gluud C, Davidson BR. A cost utility and value of information analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2010; 97: 210–9.CrossRefPubMed Wilson E, Gurusamy K, Gluud C, Davidson BR. A cost utility and value of information analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2010; 97: 210–9.CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference Cheruvu CV, Eyre-Brook IA. Consequences of prolonged wait before gallbladder surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002; 84(1):20-2PubMedCentralPubMed Cheruvu CV, Eyre-Brook IA. Consequences of prolonged wait before gallbladder surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002; 84(1):20-2PubMedCentralPubMed
57.
go back to reference Cox MR, Cook L, Dobson J, Lambrakis P, Ganesh S, Cregan P. Acute surgical unit: a new model of care. ANZ J Surg. 2010;80(6):419-24CrossRefPubMed Cox MR, Cook L, Dobson J, Lambrakis P, Ganesh S, Cregan P. Acute surgical unit: a new model of care. ANZ J Surg. 2010;80(6):419-24CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Pepingco, L., Eslick, G., Cox, M. The acute surgical unit as a novel model of care for patients presenting with acute cholecystitis. MJA. 2012; 196(8), 509-510.PubMed Pepingco, L., Eslick, G., Cox, M. The acute surgical unit as a novel model of care for patients presenting with acute cholecystitis. MJA. 2012; 196(8), 509-510.PubMed
59.
go back to reference Nagaraja V, Eslick GD, Cox MR. The acute surgical unit model verses the traditional “on call” model: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2014; 38(6):1381-7.CrossRefPubMed Nagaraja V, Eslick GD, Cox MR. The acute surgical unit model verses the traditional “on call” model: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2014; 38(6):1381-7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Early Cholecystectomy Is Superior to Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: a Meta-analysis
Authors
Amy M. Cao
Guy D. Eslick
Michael R. Cox
Publication date
01-05-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2747-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 5/2015 Go to the issue