Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 1/2017

Open Access 01-01-2017 | 2016 SSAT Plenary Presentation

The Sooner, the Better? The Importance of Optimal Timing of Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis: Data from the National Swedish Registry for Gallstone Surgery, GallRiks

Authors: My Blohm, Johanna Österberg, Gabriel Sandblom, Lars Lundell, Mats Hedberg, Lars Enochsson

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Up-front cholecystectomy is the recommended therapy for acute cholecystitis (AC). However, the scientific basis for the definition of the optimal timing for surgery is scarce. The aim of this study was to analyze how the timing of surgery, after the admission to hospital for AC, affects the intra- and postoperative outcomes. Within the national Swedish Registry for Gallstone Surgery and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (GallRiks), all patients undergoing cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis between January 2006 and December 2014 were identified. Data regarding patient characteristics, intra- and postoperative adverse events (AEs), bile duct injuries, and 30- and 90-day mortality risk were captured, and the correlation between the surgical timing and these parameters was analyzed. In total, data on 87,108 cholecystectomies were analyzed of which 15,760 (18.1 %) were performed due to AC. Bile duct injury, 30- and 90-day mortality risk, and intra- and postoperative AEs were significantly higher if the time from admission to surgery exceeded 4 days. The time course between surgery and complication risks seemed to be optimal if surgery was done within 2 days after hospital admission. Although AC patients operated on the day of hospital admission had a slightly increased AE rate as well as 30- and 90-day mortality rates than those operated during the interval of 1–2 days after admission, the bile duct injury and conversion rates were, in fact, significantly lower. The optimal timing of cholecystectomy for patients with AC seems to be within 2 days after admission. However, the somewhat higher frequency of AE on admission day may emphasize the importance of optimizing the patient before surgery as well as ensuring that adequate surgical resources are available.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Casillas RA, Yegiyants S, Collins JC. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred management of acute cholecystitis. Arch Surg. 2008;143(6):533–7.CrossRefPubMed Casillas RA, Yegiyants S, Collins JC. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred management of acute cholecystitis. Arch Surg. 2008;143(6):533–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Chang TC, Lin MT, Wu MH, Wang MY, Lee PH. Evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009;56(89):26–8.PubMed Chang TC, Lin MT, Wu MH, Wang MY, Lee PH. Evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009;56(89):26–8.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Cheruvu CV, Eyre-Brook IA. Consequences of prolonged wait before gallbladder surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002;84(1):20–2.PubMedPubMedCentral Cheruvu CV, Eyre-Brook IA. Consequences of prolonged wait before gallbladder surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002;84(1):20–2.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Johansson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7(5):642–5.CrossRefPubMed Johansson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7(5):642–5.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kolla SB, Aggarwal S, Kumar A, Kumar R, Chumber S, Parshad R et al. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(9):1323–7.CrossRefPubMed Kolla SB, Aggarwal S, Kumar A, Kumar R, Chumber S, Parshad R et al. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(9):1323–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lau H, Lo CY, Patil NG, Yuen WK. Early versus delayed-interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(1):82–7.CrossRefPubMed Lau H, Lo CY, Patil NG, Yuen WK. Early versus delayed-interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(1):82–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Papi C, Catarci M, D’Ambrosio L, Gili L, Koch M, Grassi GB et al. Timing of cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(1):147–55.CrossRefPubMed Papi C, Catarci M, D’Ambrosio L, Gili L, Koch M, Grassi GB et al. Timing of cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(1):147–55.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Peng WK, Sheikh Z, Nixon SJ, Paterson-Brown S. Role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the early management of acute gallbladder disease. Br J Surg. 2005;92(5):586–91.CrossRefPubMed Peng WK, Sheikh Z, Nixon SJ, Paterson-Brown S. Role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the early management of acute gallbladder disease. Br J Surg. 2005;92(5):586–91.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Shikata S, Noguchi Y, Fukui T. Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Today. 2005;35(7):553–60.CrossRefPubMed Shikata S, Noguchi Y, Fukui T. Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Today. 2005;35(7):553–60.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Siddiqui T, MacDonald A, Chong PS, Jenkins JT. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Am J Surg. 2008;195(1):40–7.CrossRefPubMed Siddiqui T, MacDonald A, Chong PS, Jenkins JT. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Am J Surg. 2008;195(1):40–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Van der Linden W, Edlund G. Early versus delayed cholecystectomy: the effect of a change in management. Br J Surg. 1981;68(11):753–7.CrossRefPubMed Van der Linden W, Edlund G. Early versus delayed cholecystectomy: the effect of a change in management. Br J Surg. 1981;68(11):753–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Banz V, Gsponer T, Candinas D, Guller U. Population-based analysis of 4113 patients with acute cholecystitis: defining the optimal time-point for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):964–70.CrossRefPubMed Banz V, Gsponer T, Candinas D, Guller U. Population-based analysis of 4113 patients with acute cholecystitis: defining the optimal time-point for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):964–70.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Gutt CN, Encke J, Koninger J, Harnoss JC, Weigand K, Kipfmuller K et al. Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304). Ann Surg. 2013;258(3):385–93.CrossRefPubMed Gutt CN, Encke J, Koninger J, Harnoss JC, Weigand K, Kipfmuller K et al. Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304). Ann Surg. 2013;258(3):385–93.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Shinya S, Yamashita Y, Takada T. The impact of the Japanese clinical guidelines on the clinical management of patients with acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20(6):611–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shinya S, Yamashita Y, Takada T. The impact of the Japanese clinical guidelines on the clinical management of patients with acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20(6):611–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Cao AM, Eslick GD, Cox MR. Early Cholecystectomy Is Superior to Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: a Meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(5):848–57.CrossRefPubMed Cao AM, Eslick GD, Cox MR. Early Cholecystectomy Is Superior to Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: a Meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(5):848–57.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Cao AM, Eslick GD, Cox MR. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to delayed acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(3):1172–82.CrossRefPubMed Cao AM, Eslick GD, Cox MR. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to delayed acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(3):1172–82.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Coccolini F, Catena F, Pisano M, Gheza F, Fagiuoli S, Di Saverio S et al. Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2015;18:196–204.CrossRefPubMed Coccolini F, Catena F, Pisano M, Gheza F, Fagiuoli S, Di Saverio S et al. Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2015;18:196–204.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Gurusamy KS, Davidson C, Gluud C, Davidson BR. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;6:CD005440. Gurusamy KS, Davidson C, Gluud C, Davidson BR. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;6:CD005440.
19.
go back to reference Polo M, Duclos A, Polazzi S, Payet C, Lifante JC, Cotte E et al. Acute Cholecystitis-Optimal Timing for Early Cholecystectomy: a French Nationwide Study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(11):2003–10.CrossRefPubMed Polo M, Duclos A, Polazzi S, Payet C, Lifante JC, Cotte E et al. Acute Cholecystitis-Optimal Timing for Early Cholecystectomy: a French Nationwide Study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(11):2003–10.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Tornqvist B, Stromberg C, Akre O, Enochsson L, Nilsson M. Selective intraoperative cholangiography and risk of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2015;102(8):952–8.CrossRefPubMed Tornqvist B, Stromberg C, Akre O, Enochsson L, Nilsson M. Selective intraoperative cholangiography and risk of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2015;102(8):952–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Tornqvist B, Stromberg C, Persson G, Nilsson M. Effect of intended intraoperative cholangiography and early detection of bile duct injury on survival after cholecystectomy: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2012;345:e6457.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tornqvist B, Stromberg C, Persson G, Nilsson M. Effect of intended intraoperative cholangiography and early detection of bile duct injury on survival after cholecystectomy: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2012;345:e6457.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Enochsson L, Thulin A, Osterberg J, Sandblom G, Persson G. The Swedish Registry of Gallstone Surgery and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (GallRiks): A nationwide registry for quality assurance of gallstone surgery. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(5):471–8.CrossRefPubMed Enochsson L, Thulin A, Osterberg J, Sandblom G, Persson G. The Swedish Registry of Gallstone Surgery and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (GallRiks): A nationwide registry for quality assurance of gallstone surgery. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(5):471–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Rystedt J, Montgomery A, Persson G. Completeness and correctness of cholecystectomy data in a national register—GallRiks. Scand J Surg. 2014;103(4):237–44.CrossRefPubMed Rystedt J, Montgomery A, Persson G. Completeness and correctness of cholecystectomy data in a national register—GallRiks. Scand J Surg. 2014;103(4):237–44.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hosmer DW, Taber S, Lemeshow S. The importance of assessing the fit of logistic regression models: a case study. Am J Public Health. 1991;81(12):1630–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hosmer DW, Taber S, Lemeshow S. The importance of assessing the fit of logistic regression models: a case study. Am J Public Health. 1991;81(12):1630–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Rystedt J, Lindell G, Montgomery A. Bile Duct Injuries Associated With 55,134 Cholecystectomies: Treatment and Outcome from a National Perspective. World J Surg. 2016;40(1):73–80.CrossRefPubMed Rystedt J, Lindell G, Montgomery A. Bile Duct Injuries Associated With 55,134 Cholecystectomies: Treatment and Outcome from a National Perspective. World J Surg. 2016;40(1):73–80.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Cameron IC, Chadwick C, Phillips J, Johnson AG. Management of acute cholecystitis in UK hospitals: time for a change. Postgrad Med J. 2004;80(943):292–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cameron IC, Chadwick C, Phillips J, Johnson AG. Management of acute cholecystitis in UK hospitals: time for a change. Postgrad Med J. 2004;80(943):292–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Senapati PS, Bhattarcharya D, Harinath G, Ammori BJ. A survey of the timing and approach to the surgical management of cholelithiasis in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis and acute cholecystitis in the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003;85(5):306–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Senapati PS, Bhattarcharya D, Harinath G, Ammori BJ. A survey of the timing and approach to the surgical management of cholelithiasis in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis and acute cholecystitis in the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003;85(5):306–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The Sooner, the Better? The Importance of Optimal Timing of Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis: Data from the National Swedish Registry for Gallstone Surgery, GallRiks
Authors
My Blohm
Johanna Österberg
Gabriel Sandblom
Lars Lundell
Mats Hedberg
Lars Enochsson
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3223-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 1/2017 Go to the issue