Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2018

01-04-2018

An endoscopic mucosal grading system is predictive of leak in stapled rectal anastomoses

Authors: Sarath Sujatha-Bhaskar, Mehraneh D. Jafari, Mark Hanna, Christina Y. Koh, Colette S. Inaba, Steven D. Mills, Joseph C. Carmichael, Ninh T. Nguyen, Michael J. Stamos, Alessio Pigazzi

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Anastomotic leak is a devastating postoperative complication following rectal anastomoses associated with significant clinical and oncological implications. As a result, there is a need for novel intraoperative methods that will help predict anastomotic leak.

Methods

From 2011 to 2014, patient undergoing rectal anastomoses by colorectal surgeons at our institution underwent prospective application of intraoperative flexible endoscopy with mucosal grading. Retrospective review of patient medical records was performed. After creation of the colorectal anastomosis, application of a three-tier endoscopic mucosal grading system occurred. Grade 1 was defined as circumferentially normal appearing peri-anastomotic mucosa. Grade 2 was defined as ischemia or congestion involving <30% of either the colon or rectal mucosa. Grade 3 was defined as ischemia or congestion involving >30% of the colon or rectal mucosa or ischemia/congestion involving both sides of the staple line.

Results

From 2011 to 2014, a total of 106 patients were reviewed. Grade 1 anastomoses were created in 92 (86.7%) patients and Grade 2 anastomoses were created in 10 (9.4%) patients. All 4 (3.8%) Grade 3 patients underwent immediate intraoperative anastomosis takedown and re-creation, with subsequent re-classification as Grade 1. Demographic and comorbidity data were similar between Grade 1 and Grade 2 patients. Anastomotic leak rate for the entire cohort was 12.2%. Grade 1 patients demonstrated a leak rate of 9.4% (9/96) and Grade 2 patients demonstrated a leak rate of 40% (4/10). Multivariate logistic regression associated Grade 2 classification with an increased risk of anastomotic leak (OR 4.09, 95% CI 1.21–13.63, P = 0.023).

Conclusion

Endoscopic mucosal grading is a feasible intraoperative technique that has a role following creation of a rectal anastomosis. Identification of a Grade 2 or Grade 3 anastomosis should provoke strong consideration for immediate intraoperative revision.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Chaudhry OO et al (2013) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. JAMA surg 148:65–71CrossRefPubMed Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Chaudhry OO et al (2013) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. JAMA surg 148:65–71CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hammond J, Lim S, Wan Y et al (2014) The burden of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: an evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 18:1176–1185CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hammond J, Lim S, Wan Y et al (2014) The burden of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: an evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 18:1176–1185CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Jager T, Nawara C, Neureiter D et al (2015) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival in mid-to-low rectal cancer. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 86:1072–1082CrossRefPubMed Jager T, Nawara C, Neureiter D et al (2015) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival in mid-to-low rectal cancer. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 86:1072–1082CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRefPubMed van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Karliczek A, Harlaar NJ, Zeebregts CJ et al (2009) Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:569–576CrossRefPubMed Karliczek A, Harlaar NJ, Zeebregts CJ et al (2009) Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:569–576CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wu Z, van de Haar RCJ, Sparreboom CL et al (2016) Is the intraoperative air leak test effective in the prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1409–1417CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wu Z, van de Haar RCJ, Sparreboom CL et al (2016) Is the intraoperative air leak test effective in the prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1409–1417CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Schiff ABB, Ghosh SK, Roy S et al (2016) Intra-operative anastomotic leak rates and testing methodology in colorectal resection surgery. J Surg Surgical Res 2:048–054 Schiff ABB, Ghosh SK, Roy S et al (2016) Intra-operative anastomotic leak rates and testing methodology in colorectal resection surgery. J Surg Surgical Res 2:048–054
8.
go back to reference James DR, Ris F, Yeung TM et al (2015) Fluorescence angiography in laparoscopic low rectal and anorectal anastomoses with pinpoint perfusion imaging–a critical appraisal with specific focus on leak risk reduction. Colorectal Dis 17(Suppl 3):16–21CrossRefPubMed James DR, Ris F, Yeung TM et al (2015) Fluorescence angiography in laparoscopic low rectal and anorectal anastomoses with pinpoint perfusion imaging–a critical appraisal with specific focus on leak risk reduction. Colorectal Dis 17(Suppl 3):16–21CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Nachiappan S, Askari A, Currie A et al (2014) Intraoperative assessment of colorectal anastomotic integrity: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 28:2513–2530CrossRefPubMed Nachiappan S, Askari A, Currie A et al (2014) Intraoperative assessment of colorectal anastomotic integrity: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 28:2513–2530CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Shamiyeh A, Szabo K, Ulf Wayand W et al (2012) Intraoperative endoscopy for the assessment of circular-stapled anastomosis in laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:65–67CrossRefPubMed Shamiyeh A, Szabo K, Ulf Wayand W et al (2012) Intraoperative endoscopy for the assessment of circular-stapled anastomosis in laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:65–67CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Li VKM, Wexner SD, Pulido N et al (2009) Use of routine intraoperative endoscopy in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery: can it further avoid anastomotic failure? Surg Endosc 23:2459CrossRefPubMed Li VKM, Wexner SD, Pulido N et al (2009) Use of routine intraoperative endoscopy in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery: can it further avoid anastomotic failure? Surg Endosc 23:2459CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lieto E, Orditura M, Castellano P et al (2011) Endoscopic intraoperative anastomotic testing may avoid early gastrointestinal anastomotic complications. A prospective study. J Gastrointest Surg 15:145–152CrossRefPubMed Lieto E, Orditura M, Castellano P et al (2011) Endoscopic intraoperative anastomotic testing may avoid early gastrointestinal anastomotic complications. A prospective study. J Gastrointest Surg 15:145–152CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lanthaler M, Biebl M, Mittermair R et al (2008) Intraoperative colonoscopy for anastomosis assessment in laparoscopically assisted left-sided colon resection: is it worthwhile? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:27–31 Lanthaler M, Biebl M, Mittermair R et al (2008) Intraoperative colonoscopy for anastomosis assessment in laparoscopically assisted left-sided colon resection: is it worthwhile? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:27–31
14.
go back to reference Schmidt O, Merkel S, Hohenberger W (2003) Anastomotic leakage after low rectal stapler anastomosis: significance of intraoperative anastomotic testing. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:239–243CrossRefPubMed Schmidt O, Merkel S, Hohenberger W (2003) Anastomotic leakage after low rectal stapler anastomosis: significance of intraoperative anastomotic testing. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:239–243CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Jafari MD, Wexner SD, Martz JE et al (2015) Perfusion assessment in laparoscopic left-sided/anterior resection (PILLAR II): a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll Surg 220(82–92):e1 Jafari MD, Wexner SD, Martz JE et al (2015) Perfusion assessment in laparoscopic left-sided/anterior resection (PILLAR II): a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll Surg 220(82–92):e1
17.
go back to reference Shogan BD, Belogortseva N, Luong PM et al (2015) Collagen degradation and MMP9 activation by Enterococcus faecalis contribute to intestinal anastomotic leak. Sci Transl Med 7:286ra68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shogan BD, Belogortseva N, Luong PM et al (2015) Collagen degradation and MMP9 activation by Enterococcus faecalis contribute to intestinal anastomotic leak. Sci Transl Med 7:286ra68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
An endoscopic mucosal grading system is predictive of leak in stapled rectal anastomoses
Authors
Sarath Sujatha-Bhaskar
Mehraneh D. Jafari
Mark Hanna
Christina Y. Koh
Colette S. Inaba
Steven D. Mills
Joseph C. Carmichael
Ninh T. Nguyen
Michael J. Stamos
Alessio Pigazzi
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5860-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2018 Go to the issue