Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 5/2009

Open Access 01-05-2009 | Original Article

Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery

Authors: A. Karliczek, N. J. Harlaar, C. J. Zeebregts, T. Wiggers, P. C. Baas, G. M. van Dam

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 5/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The dramatic clinical consequences of anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery can be reduced by a diverting stoma or drainage of the peri-anastomotic area. Currently, the surgeons’ clinical judgement is of major importance in decision making, but reliable data of the diagnostic accuracy are lacking. In this prospective clinical study, the surgeons’ predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage was evaluated.

Materials and methods

In 191 patients undergoing colorectal resection with anastomosis, the risk for anastomotic leakage was determined by the surgeon on the basis of a visual analogue scale (VAS). This risk assessment was compared to the actual occurrence of anastomotic leakage post-operatively.

Results

A total of 26 (13.6%) patients showed anastomotic leakage. The surgeons’ median predicted leakage rate was 7.1% in anastomoses >15 cm from the anal verge and 9.5% ≤15 cm (sensitivity 38/62%, specificity 46/52%). Diagnostic accuracy was not influenced by the surgeons’ training level (VAS score, surgeons 7.8% vs assistant surgeons 8.5%, p = 0.96, sensitivity 41% vs 44%, specificity 59% vs 48%, p = 0.20).

Conclusion

The surgeons’ clinical risk assessment appeared to have a low predictive value for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. The low a priori risk of anastomotic leakage of 14% resulted in a low post-test odds (11%) of correct prediction of anastomotic leakage. This warrants the ongoing search for a better diagnostic test of anastomotic leakage to prevent morbidity and mortality.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D et al (2002) Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 26:499–502PubMedCrossRef Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D et al (2002) Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 26:499–502PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ptok H, Marusch F, Meyer F et al (2007) Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome after rectal cancer resection. Br J Surg 94:1548–1554PubMedCrossRef Ptok H, Marusch F, Meyer F et al (2007) Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome after rectal cancer resection. Br J Surg 94:1548–1554PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Norstein J et al (2005) Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group. Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients. Colorectal Dis 7:51–57PubMedCrossRef Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Norstein J et al (2005) Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group. Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients. Colorectal Dis 7:51–57PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Karl RC, Schreiber R, Boulware D et al (2000) Factors affecting morbidity, mortality and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Ann Surg 5:635–643CrossRef Karl RC, Schreiber R, Boulware D et al (2000) Factors affecting morbidity, mortality and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Ann Surg 5:635–643CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Viklund P, Lindblad M, Lu M et al (2006) Risk factors for complications after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective population-based study. Ann Surg 243:204–211PubMedCrossRef Viklund P, Lindblad M, Lu M et al (2006) Risk factors for complications after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective population-based study. Ann Surg 243:204–211PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC et al (1997) Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1014 patients. J Am Coll Surg 185:113–121 Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC et al (1997) Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1014 patients. J Am Coll Surg 185:113–121
7.
go back to reference Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Andersson M et al (2004) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 6:462–469PubMedCrossRef Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Andersson M et al (2004) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 6:462–469PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Katory M, Tang CL, Koh WL, Fook-Chong SMC, Loi TT, Ooi BS, Ho KS, Eu KW (2008) A 6-year review of surgical morbidity and oncological outcome after high anterior resection for colorectal malignancy with and without splenic mobilisation. Colorectal Dis 10:165–169PubMed Katory M, Tang CL, Koh WL, Fook-Chong SMC, Loi TT, Ooi BS, Ho KS, Eu KW (2008) A 6-year review of surgical morbidity and oncological outcome after high anterior resection for colorectal malignancy with and without splenic mobilisation. Colorectal Dis 10:165–169PubMed
9.
go back to reference Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Simert G, Sjödahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246:207–214PubMedCrossRef Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Simert G, Sjödahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246:207–214PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R, Wolff S, Koeckerling F, Lippert H, Working Group ‘Colon/Rectum Carcinoma’ (2005) Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 92:1137–1142PubMedCrossRef Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R, Wolff S, Koeckerling F, Lippert H, Working Group ‘Colon/Rectum Carcinoma’ (2005) Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 92:1137–1142PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Rutten HJ, van de Velde CJ, Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216PubMedCrossRef Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Rutten HJ, van de Velde CJ, Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pettigrew RA, Burns HJG, Carter DC (1987) Evaluating surgical risk: the importance of technical factors in determining outcome. Br J Surg 74:791–794PubMedCrossRef Pettigrew RA, Burns HJG, Carter DC (1987) Evaluating surgical risk: the importance of technical factors in determining outcome. Br J Surg 74:791–794PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pettigrew RA, Hill GL (1986) Indicators of surgical risk and clinical judgement. Br J Surg 73:47–51PubMedCrossRef Pettigrew RA, Hill GL (1986) Indicators of surgical risk and clinical judgement. Br J Surg 73:47–51PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Markus PM, Martell J, Leister I, Horstmann O, Brinker J, Becker H (2005) Predicting postoperative morbidity by clinical assessment. Br J Surg 92:101–106PubMedCrossRef Markus PM, Martell J, Leister I, Horstmann O, Brinker J, Becker H (2005) Predicting postoperative morbidity by clinical assessment. Br J Surg 92:101–106PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Makela JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S (2003) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 46:653–660PubMedCrossRef Makela JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S (2003) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 46:653–660PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Stokes KY, Granger DN (2005) The microcirculation: a motor for the systemic inflammatory response and large vessel disease induced by hypercholesterolaemia? J Physiol 562:647–653PubMedCrossRef Stokes KY, Granger DN (2005) The microcirculation: a motor for the systemic inflammatory response and large vessel disease induced by hypercholesterolaemia? J Physiol 562:647–653PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Benaron DA, Parachikov IH, Friedland S et al (2004) Continuous, noninvasive and localised microvascular tissue oximetry using visible light spectroscopy. Anesthesiology 100:1469–1475PubMedCrossRef Benaron DA, Parachikov IH, Friedland S et al (2004) Continuous, noninvasive and localised microvascular tissue oximetry using visible light spectroscopy. Anesthesiology 100:1469–1475PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Friedland SR, Benaron D (2004) Reflectance spectrophotometry for the assessment of mucosal perfusion in the gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 14:539–555PubMedCrossRef Friedland SR, Benaron D (2004) Reflectance spectrophotometry for the assessment of mucosal perfusion in the gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 14:539–555PubMedCrossRef
20.
Metadata
Title
Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery
Authors
A. Karliczek
N. J. Harlaar
C. J. Zeebregts
T. Wiggers
P. C. Baas
G. M. van Dam
Publication date
01-05-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 5/2009
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0658-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2009

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 5/2009 Go to the issue