Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2015

01-06-2015

Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colonic disease: a meta-analysis of postoperative variables

Authors: Alberto Zarak, Alvaro Castillo, Kandace Kichler, Lucy de la Cruz, Leonardo Tamariz, Srinivas Kaza

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

An increasing number of studies have been published since the introduction of robotic technology into general surgery. Gastrointestinal surgery is an area of special interest for the robotic surgeon. Colonic surgery can be challenging depending on the disease and the operative approach. We seek to perform a meta-analysis comparing robotic surgery against laparoscopic surgery in this particular field.

Materials and methods

We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE database from January 2001 to July 2013 supplemented by manual searches of bibliographies of key relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were selected for review and for collection of postoperative data (length of stay, time to first flatus and complications).

Results

After careful review, nine studies were considered for analysis. Non-pooled data showed a slight trend toward laparoscopy with increased number of events without statistical significance. Pooled data demonstrated a statistical significance for return to bowel function in the right and mixed robotic colectomy arm (WSMD −0.33, 95 % CI −0.5, −0.1; p < 0.005 and WSMD −0.26, 95 % CI −0.51, 0.0; p = 0.05). Pooled data of length of stay and complications showed no statistical significance between robotic and laparoscopic colonic surgery.

Discussion

Robotic surgery is a comparable option when dealing with colonic disease, either benign or malignant. No difference in complication rate or length of stay was found when comparing the two. Robotic surgery appears to have an advantage over laparoscopy in regards to return of bowel function when dealing with right colectomies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Makin GB, Breen DJ, Monson JR (2001) The impact of new technology on surgery for colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 7(5):612–621PubMed Makin GB, Breen DJ, Monson JR (2001) The impact of new technology on surgery for colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 7(5):612–621PubMed
2.
go back to reference Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH (2014) Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 18(4):816–830CrossRefPubMed Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH (2014) Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 18(4):816–830CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Xiong B, Ma L, Zhang C, Cheng Y (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Surg Res 188:404–414CrossRefPubMed Xiong B, Ma L, Zhang C, Cheng Y (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Surg Res 188:404–414CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference González Fernández AM, Mascareñas González JF (2012) Total laparoscopic mesorectal excision versus robot-assisted in the treatment of rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Cir Esp 90(6):348–354CrossRefPubMed González Fernández AM, Mascareñas González JF (2012) Total laparoscopic mesorectal excision versus robot-assisted in the treatment of rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Cir Esp 90(6):348–354CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Memon S, Heriot AG, Murphy DG et al (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19(7):2095–2101CrossRefPubMed Memon S, Heriot AG, Murphy DG et al (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19(7):2095–2101CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Rockall TA, Darzi A (2003) Robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Clin North Am 83(6):1463–1468CrossRefPubMed Rockall TA, Darzi A (2003) Robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Clin North Am 83(6):1463–1468CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
go back to reference Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH et al (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20(10):1521–1525CrossRefPubMed Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH et al (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20(10):1521–1525CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Oxman AD, Guyatt GH (1991) Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol 44:1271–1278CrossRefPubMed Oxman AD, Guyatt GH (1991) Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol 44:1271–1278CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Woeste G, Bechstein WO, Wullstein C (2005) Does telerobotic assistance improve laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Int J Colorectal Dis 20(3):253–257CrossRefPubMed Woeste G, Bechstein WO, Wullstein C (2005) Does telerobotic assistance improve laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Int J Colorectal Dis 20(3):253–257CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK et al (2007) Roboticversus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 21(10):1701–1708 Epub 2007 Mar 13CrossRefPubMed Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK et al (2007) Roboticversus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 21(10):1701–1708 Epub 2007 Mar 13CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference deSouza AL, Prasad LM, Park JJ et al (2010) Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? Dis Colon Rectum 53(7):1000–1006CrossRefPubMed deSouza AL, Prasad LM, Park JJ et al (2010) Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? Dis Colon Rectum 53(7):1000–1006CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Deutsch GB, Sathyanarayana SA, Gunabushanam V et al (2012) Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience. Surg Endosc 26(4):956–963CrossRefPubMed Deutsch GB, Sathyanarayana SA, Gunabushanam V et al (2012) Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience. Surg Endosc 26(4):956–963CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bertani E, Chiappa A, Biffi R et al (2011) Assessing appropriateness for elective colorectal cancer surgery: clinical, oncological, and quality-of-lifeshort-term outcomes employing different treatment approaches. Int J Colorectal Dis 26(10):1317–1327CrossRefPubMed Bertani E, Chiappa A, Biffi R et al (2011) Assessing appropriateness for elective colorectal cancer surgery: clinical, oncological, and quality-of-lifeshort-term outcomes employing different treatment approaches. Int J Colorectal Dis 26(10):1317–1327CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Shin JY (2012) Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between a robotic colectomy and a laparoscopic colectomy during early experience. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 28(1):19–26CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Shin JY (2012) Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between a robotic colectomy and a laparoscopic colectomy during early experience. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 28(1):19–26CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
16.
go back to reference Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY et al (2012) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg 99(9):1219–1226CrossRefPubMed Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY et al (2012) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg 99(9):1219–1226CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lim DR, Min BS, Kim MS et al (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic anterio resection of sigmoid colon cancer: comparative study of long-termoncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 27(4):1379–1385CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Lim DR, Min BS, Kim MS et al (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic anterio resection of sigmoid colon cancer: comparative study of long-termoncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 27(4):1379–1385CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
18.
go back to reference Helvind NM, Eriksen JR, Mogensen A et al (2013) No differences in short-term morbidity and mortality after robot-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopic resection for colonic cancer: a case-control study of 263 patients. Surg Endosc 27(7):2575–2580CrossRefPubMed Helvind NM, Eriksen JR, Mogensen A et al (2013) No differences in short-term morbidity and mortality after robot-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopic resection for colonic cancer: a case-control study of 263 patients. Surg Endosc 27(7):2575–2580CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
20.
go back to reference Luca F, Cenciarelli S, Valvo M et al (2009) Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1274–1278CrossRefPubMed Luca F, Cenciarelli S, Valvo M et al (2009) Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1274–1278CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS et al (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1480–1487CrossRefPubMed Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS et al (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1480–1487CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Hellan M, Anderson C, Ellenhorn JD et al (2007) Short term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:3168–3173CrossRefPubMed Hellan M, Anderson C, Ellenhorn JD et al (2007) Short term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:3168–3173CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM et al (2008) Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc 22:1601–1608CrossRefPubMed Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM et al (2008) Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc 22:1601–1608CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Schwab KE, Dowson HM, Van Dellen J et al (2009) The uptake of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in great Britain and Ireland: a questionnaire survey of consultant members of the ACPGBI. Colorectal Dis 11:318CrossRefPubMed Schwab KE, Dowson HM, Van Dellen J et al (2009) The uptake of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in great Britain and Ireland: a questionnaire survey of consultant members of the ACPGBI. Colorectal Dis 11:318CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Bardram L et al (2005) Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg 241:416–423CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Bardram L et al (2005) Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg 241:416–423CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
26.
go back to reference Reissman P, Cohen S, Weiss EG et al (1996) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: ascending the learning curve. World J Surg 20:277–281CrossRefPubMed Reissman P, Cohen S, Weiss EG et al (1996) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: ascending the learning curve. World J Surg 20:277–281CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA et al (2001) defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44:217–222CrossRefPubMed Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA et al (2001) defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44:217–222CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP et al (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP et al (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
29.
go back to reference Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F et al (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1627–1632CrossRefPubMed Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F et al (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1627–1632CrossRefPubMed
30.
31.
go back to reference Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA et al (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252(2):254–262CrossRefPubMed Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA et al (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252(2):254–262CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colonic disease: a meta-analysis of postoperative variables
Authors
Alberto Zarak
Alvaro Castillo
Kandace Kichler
Lucy de la Cruz
Leonardo Tamariz
Srinivas Kaza
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4197-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2015 Go to the issue