Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2015

01-12-2015

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: single-surgeon experience

Authors: Mingjun Wang, Hua Zhang, Zhong Wu, Zhaoda Zhang, Bing Peng

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Innovations in surgical strategies and technologies have facilitated laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). However, data regarding the short-term and long-term results of LPD are sparse, and this procedure is the primary focus of the current study.

Methods

Between October 2010 and October 2013, a total of 31 consecutive patients received LPD, including hand-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, and laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Data regarding short-term surgical outcomes and long-term oncological results were collected prospectively.

Results

The median operative time was 515.0 min (interquartile range 465.0–585.0 min). The median intraoperative estimated blood loss was 260.0 mL (interquartile range 150.0–430.0 mL). Conversion to open pancreaticoduodenectomy was required in three patients (9.7 %) due to intraoperative pneumoperitoneum intolerance (n = 1, 3.2 %) and tumor adherence to the superior mesenteric vein (n = 2, 6.5 %). No significant differences between the surgical approaches were observed in regard to intraoperative and postoperative data. Postoperative severe complications (Clavien ≥ III) were detected in three (9.7 %) patients, including one grade C pancreatic fistula, one grade B postoperative bleeding event, and one afferent loop obstruction. There were no deaths within 30 days following LPD. The final pathological results revealed duodenal adenocarcinoma in 14 (45.2 %) patients, ampullary adenocarcinoma in four (12.9 %) patients, distal common bile duct cancer in six (19.4 %) patients, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in five (16.1 %) patients, gastrointestinal stroma tumor in one (3.2 %) patient, and chronic pancreatitis in one (3.2 %) patient. All patients suffering from tumors underwent R0 resection (n = 30, 100.0 %), with the optimal number of collected lymph nodes (median: 13, interquartile range 11–19). At the most recent follow-up, 20 patients were still alive, and the 1-, and 3-year overall survival for patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma were 100.0 and 71.4 %, respectively.

Conclusions

According to this study, LPD is feasible and technically safe for highly selected patients and can offer acceptable oncological outcomes and long-term survival.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fernandez-Cruz L, Saenz A, Astudillo E, Martinez I, Hoyos S, Pantoja JP, Navarro S (2002) Outcome of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: endocrine and nonendocrine tumors. World J Surg 26:1057–1065CrossRefPubMed Fernandez-Cruz L, Saenz A, Astudillo E, Martinez I, Hoyos S, Pantoja JP, Navarro S (2002) Outcome of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: endocrine and nonendocrine tumors. World J Surg 26:1057–1065CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ammori BJ, Ayiomamitis GD (2011) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a UK experience and a systematic review of the literature. Surg Endosc 25:2084–2099CrossRefPubMed Ammori BJ, Ayiomamitis GD (2011) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a UK experience and a systematic review of the literature. Surg Endosc 25:2084–2099CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mabrut JY, Fernandez-Cruz L, Azagra JS, Bassi C, Delvaux G, Weerts J, Fabre JM, Boulez J, Baulieux J, Peix JL, Gigot JF, Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic Section of the Royal Belgian Society of S, Belgian Group for Endoscopic S, Hepatobiliary Club C (2005) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients. Surgery 137:597–605CrossRefPubMed Mabrut JY, Fernandez-Cruz L, Azagra JS, Bassi C, Delvaux G, Weerts J, Fabre JM, Boulez J, Baulieux J, Peix JL, Gigot JF, Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic Section of the Royal Belgian Society of S, Belgian Group for Endoscopic S, Hepatobiliary Club C (2005) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients. Surgery 137:597–605CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hall NJ, Pacilli M, Eaton S, Reblock K, Gaines BA, Pastor A, Langer JC, Koivusalo AI, Pakarinen MP, Stroedter L, Beyerlein S, Haddad M, Clarke S, Ford H, Pierro A (2009) Recovery after open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a double-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 373:390–398CrossRefPubMed Hall NJ, Pacilli M, Eaton S, Reblock K, Gaines BA, Pastor A, Langer JC, Koivusalo AI, Pakarinen MP, Stroedter L, Beyerlein S, Haddad M, Clarke S, Ford H, Pierro A (2009) Recovery after open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a double-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 373:390–398CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Wei CH, Fu YW, Wang NL, Du YC, Sheu JC (2015) Laparoscopy versus open surgery for idiopathic intussusception in children. Surg Endosc 29:668–672CrossRefPubMed Wei CH, Fu YW, Wang NL, Du YC, Sheu JC (2015) Laparoscopy versus open surgery for idiopathic intussusception in children. Surg Endosc 29:668–672CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S, Futawatari N, Katada N, Watanabe M, Okutomi T, Wang G, Bax L (2013) Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by expert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese patients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 27:1695–1705CrossRefPubMed Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S, Futawatari N, Katada N, Watanabe M, Okutomi T, Wang G, Bax L (2013) Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by expert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese patients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 27:1695–1705CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRefPubMed Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Pugliese R, Scandroglio I, Sansonna F, Maggioni D, Costanzi A, Citterio D, Ferrari GC, Di Lernia S, Magistro C (2008) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective review of 19 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:13–18CrossRefPubMed Pugliese R, Scandroglio I, Sansonna F, Maggioni D, Costanzi A, Citterio D, Ferrari GC, Di Lernia S, Magistro C (2008) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective review of 19 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:13–18CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gagner M, Pomp A (1997) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: Is it worthwhile? J Gastrointest Surg 1:20–25; discussion 25–26 Gagner M, Pomp A (1997) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: Is it worthwhile? J Gastrointest Surg 1:20–25; discussion 25–26
10.
go back to reference Gumbs AA, Gres P, Madureira FA, Gayet B (2008) Laparoscopic vs. open resection of noninvasive intraductal pancreatic mucinous neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg 12:707–712CrossRefPubMed Gumbs AA, Gres P, Madureira FA, Gayet B (2008) Laparoscopic vs. open resection of noninvasive intraductal pancreatic mucinous neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg 12:707–712CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Gentileschi P, Gagner M (2001) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection. Chir Ital 53:279–289PubMed Gentileschi P, Gagner M (2001) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection. Chir Ital 53:279–289PubMed
12.
go back to reference Kimura Y, Hirata K, Mukaiya M, Mizuguchi T, Koito K, Katsuramaki T (2005) Hand-assisted laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreas head disease. Am J Surg 189:734–737CrossRefPubMed Kimura Y, Hirata K, Mukaiya M, Mizuguchi T, Koito K, Katsuramaki T (2005) Hand-assisted laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreas head disease. Am J Surg 189:734–737CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ammori BJ (2004) Laparoscopic hand-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: initial UK experience. Surg Endosc 18:717–718CrossRefPubMed Ammori BJ (2004) Laparoscopic hand-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: initial UK experience. Surg Endosc 18:717–718CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Cuschieri A (1988) Laparoscopy for pancreatic cancer: does it benefit the patient? Eur J Surg Oncol 14:41–44PubMed Cuschieri A (1988) Laparoscopy for pancreatic cancer: does it benefit the patient? Eur J Surg Oncol 14:41–44PubMed
15.
go back to reference Rhodes M, Nathanson L, Fielding G (1995) Laparoscopic biliary and gastric bypass: a useful adjunct in the treatment of carcinoma of the pancreas. Gut 36:778–780PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Rhodes M, Nathanson L, Fielding G (1995) Laparoscopic biliary and gastric bypass: a useful adjunct in the treatment of carcinoma of the pancreas. Gut 36:778–780PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A (2006) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases. Surg Endosc 20:1045–1050CrossRefPubMed Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A (2006) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases. Surg Endosc 20:1045–1050CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Briggs CD, Mann CD, Irving GR, Neal CP, Peterson M, Cameron IC, Berry DP (2009) Systematic review of minimally invasive pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1129–1137CrossRefPubMed Briggs CD, Mann CD, Irving GR, Neal CP, Peterson M, Cameron IC, Berry DP (2009) Systematic review of minimally invasive pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1129–1137CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kuroki T, Adachi T, Okamoto T, Kanematsu T (2012) A non-randomized comparative study of laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 59:570–573CrossRefPubMed Kuroki T, Adachi T, Okamoto T, Kanematsu T (2012) A non-randomized comparative study of laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 59:570–573CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo K, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML (2014) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 260:633–640CrossRefPubMed Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo K, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML (2014) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 260:633–640CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference American Joint Committee on Cancer (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRef American Joint Committee on Cancer (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Al-Taan OS, Stephenson JA, Briggs C, Pollard C, Metcalfe MS, Dennison AR (2010) Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: a review of present results and future prospects. HPB (Oxford) 12:239–243CrossRef Al-Taan OS, Stephenson JA, Briggs C, Pollard C, Metcalfe MS, Dennison AR (2010) Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: a review of present results and future prospects. HPB (Oxford) 12:239–243CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Gumbs AA, Gayet B (2008) The laparoscopic duodenopancreatectomy: the posterior approach. Surg Endosc 22:539–540CrossRefPubMed Gumbs AA, Gayet B (2008) The laparoscopic duodenopancreatectomy: the posterior approach. Surg Endosc 22:539–540CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Vaithiswaran V, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Praveen Raj P (2009) Evolution in techniques of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a decade long experience from a tertiary center. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:731–740CrossRefPubMed Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Vaithiswaran V, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Praveen Raj P (2009) Evolution in techniques of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a decade long experience from a tertiary center. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:731–740CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145:19–23CrossRefPubMed Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145:19–23CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Zureikat AH, Breaux JA, Steel JL, Hughes SJ (2011) Can laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy be safely implemented? J Gastrointest Surg 15:1151–1157CrossRefPubMed Zureikat AH, Breaux JA, Steel JL, Hughes SJ (2011) Can laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy be safely implemented? J Gastrointest Surg 15:1151–1157CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Bao PQ, Mazirka PO, Watkins KT (2014) Retrospective comparison of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg 18:682–689CrossRefPubMed Bao PQ, Mazirka PO, Watkins KT (2014) Retrospective comparison of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg 18:682–689CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Bilimoria MM, Cormier JN, Mun Y, Lee JE, Evans DB, Pisters PW (2003) Pancreatic leak after left pancreatectomy is reduced following main pancreatic duct ligation. Br J Surg 90:190–196CrossRefPubMed Bilimoria MM, Cormier JN, Mun Y, Lee JE, Evans DB, Pisters PW (2003) Pancreatic leak after left pancreatectomy is reduced following main pancreatic duct ligation. Br J Surg 90:190–196CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP, Sauter PK, Bower-Cherry M, Dutkevitch S, Hyslop T, Schmidt CM, Rosato EL, Lavu H, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ (2009) Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial. J Am Coll Surg 208:738–747; discussion 747–739 Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP, Sauter PK, Bower-Cherry M, Dutkevitch S, Hyslop T, Schmidt CM, Rosato EL, Lavu H, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ (2009) Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial. J Am Coll Surg 208:738–747; discussion 747–739
33.
go back to reference Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, Mantovani W, Butturini G, Gumbs AA, Salvia R, Pederzoli P (2003) Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery 134:766–771CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, Mantovani W, Butturini G, Gumbs AA, Salvia R, Pederzoli P (2003) Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery 134:766–771CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Jimenez RE, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Chang Y, Warshaw AL (2000) Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation or with antrectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 231:293–300PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jimenez RE, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Chang Y, Warshaw AL (2000) Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation or with antrectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 231:293–300PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Balcom JHT, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C (2001) Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 136:391–398CrossRefPubMed Balcom JHT, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C (2001) Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 136:391–398CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Tran KT, Smeenk HG, van Eijck CH, Kazemier G, Hop WC, Greve JW, Terpstra OT, Zijlstra JA, Klinkert P, Jeekel H (2004) Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: a prospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors. Ann Surg 240:738–745PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Tran KT, Smeenk HG, van Eijck CH, Kazemier G, Hop WC, Greve JW, Terpstra OT, Zijlstra JA, Klinkert P, Jeekel H (2004) Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: a prospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors. Ann Surg 240:738–745PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Horstmann O, Markus PM, Ghadimi MB, Becker H (2004) Pylorus preservation has no impact on delayed gastric emptying after pancreatic head resection. Pancreas 28:69–74CrossRefPubMed Horstmann O, Markus PM, Ghadimi MB, Becker H (2004) Pylorus preservation has no impact on delayed gastric emptying after pancreatic head resection. Pancreas 28:69–74CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA (2012) Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion severity grading system. J Am Coll Surg 215:810–819CrossRefPubMed Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA (2012) Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion severity grading system. J Am Coll Surg 215:810–819CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Boggi U, Amorese G, Vistoli F, Caniglia F, De Lio N, Perrone V, Barbarello L, Belluomini M, Signori S, Mosca F (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc 29:9–23CrossRefPubMed Boggi U, Amorese G, Vistoli F, Caniglia F, De Lio N, Perrone V, Barbarello L, Belluomini M, Signori S, Mosca F (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc 29:9–23CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy—a comparative study. Int J Surg 10:475–479CrossRefPubMed Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy—a comparative study. Int J Surg 10:475–479CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Chalikonda S, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Walsh RM (2012) Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection. Surg Endosc 26:2397–2402CrossRefPubMed Chalikonda S, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Walsh RM (2012) Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection. Surg Endosc 26:2397–2402CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Valsangkar NP, Bush DM, Michaelson JS, Ferrone CR, Wargo JA, Lillemoe KD, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Warshaw AL, Thayer SP (2013) N0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The effect of lymph node number on accurate survival prediction in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 17:257–266PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Valsangkar NP, Bush DM, Michaelson JS, Ferrone CR, Wargo JA, Lillemoe KD, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Warshaw AL, Thayer SP (2013) N0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The effect of lymph node number on accurate survival prediction in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 17:257–266PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Huebner M, Kendrick M, Reid-Lombardo KM, Que F, Therneau T, Qin R, Donohue J, Nagorney D, Farnell M, Sarr M (2012) Number of lymph nodes evaluated: prognostic value in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 16:920–926CrossRefPubMed Huebner M, Kendrick M, Reid-Lombardo KM, Que F, Therneau T, Qin R, Donohue J, Nagorney D, Farnell M, Sarr M (2012) Number of lymph nodes evaluated: prognostic value in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 16:920–926CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Hakeem AR, Verbeke CS, Cairns A, Aldouri A, Smith AM, Menon KV (2014) A matched-pair analysis of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes using leeds pathology protocol. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 13:435–441CrossRefPubMed Hakeem AR, Verbeke CS, Cairns A, Aldouri A, Smith AM, Menon KV (2014) A matched-pair analysis of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes using leeds pathology protocol. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 13:435–441CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: single-surgeon experience
Authors
Mingjun Wang
Hua Zhang
Zhong Wu
Zhaoda Zhang
Bing Peng
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4154-5

Other articles of this Issue 12/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2015 Go to the issue