Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 5/2012

01-05-2012 | 2011 SSAT Poster Presentation

Number of Lymph Nodes Evaluated: Prognostic Value in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Authors: Marianne Huebner, Michael Kendrick, Kaye M. Reid-Lombardo, Florencia Que, Terry Therneau, Rui Qin, John Donohue, David Nagorney, Michael Farnell, Michael Sarr

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The impact of the number of lymph node (LN) evaluated pathologically on accurate staging is unknown. Our primary aim was to determine a minimum number of evaluated LN needed to provide accurate staging of pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Four hundred ninety-nine patients underwent a curative pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma cancer from 1981–2007. The probability of understaging a patient as N0 was estimated based on the number of LN evaluated. The prognostic value of LN ratio (LNR) was assessed.

Results

Survival for node-negative (pN0) patients with <11 LN examined was worse than for pN0 patients with ≥11 LNs with a hazard ratio (95 % CI) of 1.33 (1.1–1.7, p = 0.01) with 3-year survivals of 32 vs. 50%, respectively. Three-year survival for pN1 patients with <11 nodes evaluated was similar to pN1 patients with ≥11 nodes (25 vs. 30%). LNR ≥ 0.17 predicted worse survival with hazard ratio of 1.76 (1.3–2.4, p = 0.001) than LNR < 0.17; 3-year survivals were 37 vs. 19%.

Conclusion

Patients with “N0” disease with <11 LN evaluated pathologically have worse survival, suggesting that metastatic nodes were missed by evaluating too few nodes. For pN1 patients, LNR stratifies survival of patient cohorts more accurately. Adequate staging of pancreatic cancer requires pathologic evaluation of ≥11 LNs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Huang CM, Lin JX, Zheng CH, et al. Prognostic impact of metastatic lymph node ratio on gastric cancer after curative distal gastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16: 2055–60. Huang CM, Lin JX, Zheng CH, et al. Prognostic impact of metastatic lymph node ratio on gastric cancer after curative distal gastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16: 2055–60.
2.
go back to reference Schiffman SC, McMasters KM, Scoggins CR, Martin RC, Chagpar AB. Lymph node ratio: a proposed refinement of current axillary staging in breast cancer patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2011; 213: 45–52. Schiffman SC, McMasters KM, Scoggins CR, Martin RC, Chagpar AB. Lymph node ratio: a proposed refinement of current axillary staging in breast cancer patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2011; 213: 45–52.
3.
go back to reference Greenberg R, Itah R, Ghinea R, Sacham-Shmueli E, Inbar R, Avital S. Metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic variable in colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic resection. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2011; 15: 273–9. Greenberg R, Itah R, Ghinea R, Sacham-Shmueli E, Inbar R, Avital S. Metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic variable in colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic resection. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2011; 15: 273–9.
4.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Cancer Society. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998; 1: 10–24. Japanese Gastric Cancer Society. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998; 1: 10–24.
5.
go back to reference Isaji S, Kawarada Y, Uemoto S. Classification of pancreatic cancer: comparison of Japanese and UICC classifications. Pancreas. 2004; 28: 231–4.PubMedCrossRef Isaji S, Kawarada Y, Uemoto S. Classification of pancreatic cancer: comparison of Japanese and UICC classifications. Pancreas. 2004; 28: 231–4.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pawlik TM, Abdalla EK, Barnett CC, et al. Feasibility of a randomized trial of extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg. 2005; 140: 584–9; discussion 9–91. Pawlik TM, Abdalla EK, Barnett CC, et al. Feasibility of a randomized trial of extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg. 2005; 140: 584–9; discussion 9–91.
7.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality. Annals of Surgery. 2002; 236: 355–66; discussion 66–8. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality. Annals of Surgery. 2002; 236: 355–66; discussion 66–8.
8.
go back to reference Schwarz RE, Smith DD. Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: information from a large US population database. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2006; 13: 1189–200.PubMedCrossRef Schwarz RE, Smith DD. Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: information from a large US population database. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2006; 13: 1189–200.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tomlinson JS, Jain S, Bentrem DJ, et al. Accuracy of staging node-negative pancreas cancer: a potential quality measure. Arch Surg. 2007; 142: 767–23; discussion 73–4. Tomlinson JS, Jain S, Bentrem DJ, et al. Accuracy of staging node-negative pancreas cancer: a potential quality measure. Arch Surg. 2007; 142: 767–23; discussion 73–4.
10.
go back to reference Schoenleber SJ, Schnelldorfer T, Wood CM, Qin R, Sarr MG, Donohue JH. Factors influencing lymph node recovery from the operative specimen after gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009; 13: 1233–7.PubMedCrossRef Schoenleber SJ, Schnelldorfer T, Wood CM, Qin R, Sarr MG, Donohue JH. Factors influencing lymph node recovery from the operative specimen after gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009; 13: 1233–7.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Berger AC, Watson JC, Ross EA, Hoffman JP. The metastatic/examined lymph node ratio is an important prognostic factor after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The American surgeon. 2004; 70: 235–40; discussion 40. Berger AC, Watson JC, Ross EA, Hoffman JP. The metastatic/examined lymph node ratio is an important prognostic factor after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The American surgeon. 2004; 70: 235–40; discussion 40.
12.
go back to reference House MG, Gonen M, Jarnagin WR, et al. Prognostic significance of pathologic nodal status in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007; 11: 1549–55.PubMedCrossRef House MG, Gonen M, Jarnagin WR, et al. Prognostic significance of pathologic nodal status in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007; 11: 1549–55.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pawlik TM, Gleisner AL, Cameron JL, et al. Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 2007; 141: 610–8.PubMedCrossRef Pawlik TM, Gleisner AL, Cameron JL, et al. Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 2007; 141: 610–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Riediger H, Keck T, Wellner U, et al. The lymph node ratio is the strongest prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009; 13: 1337–44.PubMedCrossRef Riediger H, Keck T, Wellner U, et al. The lymph node ratio is the strongest prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009; 13: 1337–44.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sierzega M, Popiela T, Kulig J, Nowak K. The ratio of metastatic/resected lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor in patients with node-positive pancreatic head cancer. Pancreas. 2006; 33: 240–5.PubMedCrossRef Sierzega M, Popiela T, Kulig J, Nowak K. The ratio of metastatic/resected lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor in patients with node-positive pancreatic head cancer. Pancreas. 2006; 33: 240–5.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Khan S, Sclabas G, Reid-Lombardo K, et al. Does body mass index/morbid obesity influence outcome in patients who undergo pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma? J Gastrointest Surg. 14: 1820–5. Khan S, Sclabas G, Reid-Lombardo K, et al. Does body mass index/morbid obesity influence outcome in patients who undergo pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma? J Gastrointest Surg. 14: 1820–5.
17.
go back to reference Schnelldorfer T, Ware AL, Sarr MG, et al. Long-term survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: is cure possible? Annals of surgery. 2008; 247: 456–62.PubMedCrossRef Schnelldorfer T, Ware AL, Sarr MG, et al. Long-term survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: is cure possible? Annals of surgery. 2008; 247: 456–62.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nitecki SS, Sarr MG, Colby TV, van Heerden JA. Long-term survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Is it really improving? Annals of surgery. 1995; 221: 59–66.PubMedCrossRef Nitecki SS, Sarr MG, Colby TV, van Heerden JA. Long-term survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Is it really improving? Annals of surgery. 1995; 221: 59–66.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gonen M, Schrag D, Weiser MR. Nodal staging score: a tool to assess adequate staging of node-negative colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 6166–71.PubMedCrossRef Gonen M, Schrag D, Weiser MR. Nodal staging score: a tool to assess adequate staging of node-negative colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 6166–71.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Altman DG, Lausen B, Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M. Dangers of using “optimal” cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1994; 86: 829–35.PubMedCrossRef Altman DG, Lausen B, Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M. Dangers of using “optimal” cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1994; 86: 829–35.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Contal C, O'Quigley J. An application of changepoint methods in studying the effect of age on survival in breast cancer. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis. 1999; 30: 253–70.CrossRef Contal C, O'Quigley J. An application of changepoint methods in studying the effect of age on survival in breast cancer. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis. 1999; 30: 253–70.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing 2009. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing 2009.
23.
go back to reference Vinh-Hung V, Nguyen NP, Cserni G, et al. Prognostic value of nodal ratios in node-positive breast cancer: a compiled update. Future oncology (London, UK). 2009; 5: 1585–603. Vinh-Hung V, Nguyen NP, Cserni G, et al. Prognostic value of nodal ratios in node-positive breast cancer: a compiled update. Future oncology (London, UK). 2009; 5: 1585–603.
Metadata
Title
Number of Lymph Nodes Evaluated: Prognostic Value in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Authors
Marianne Huebner
Michael Kendrick
Kaye M. Reid-Lombardo
Florencia Que
Terry Therneau
Rui Qin
John Donohue
David Nagorney
Michael Farnell
Michael Sarr
Publication date
01-05-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1853-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 5/2012 Go to the issue