Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2015

01-08-2015

An assessment of the new generation three-dimensional high definition laparoscopic vision system on surgical skills: a randomized prospective study

Authors: Taner A. Usta, Aysel Ozkaynak, Ebru Kovalak, Erdinc Ergul, M. Murat Naki, Erdal Kaya

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Two-dimensional (2D) view is known to cause practical difficulties for surgeons in conventional laparoscopy. Our goal was to evaluate whether the new-generation, Three-Dimensional Laparoscopic Vision System (3D LVS) provides greater benefit in terms of execution time and error number during the performance of surgical tasks.

Methods

This study tests the hypothesis that the use of the new generation 3D LVS can significantly improve technical ability on complex laparoscopic tasks in an experimental model. Twenty-four participants (8 experienced, 8 minimally experienced, and 8 inexperienced) were evaluated for 10 different tasks in terms of total execution time and error number. The 4-point lickert scale was used for subjective assessment of the two imaging modalities.

Results

All tasks were completed by all participants. Statistically significant difference was determined between 3D and 2D systems in the tasks of bead transfer and drop, suturing, and pick-and-place in the inexperienced group; in the task of passing through two circles with the needle in the minimally experienced group; and in the tasks of bead transfer and drop, suturing and passing through two circles with the needle in the experienced group. Three-dimensional imaging was preferred over 2D in 6 of the 10 subjective criteria questions on 4-point lickert scale.

Conclusions

The majority of the tasks were completed in a shorter time using 3D LVS compared to 2D LVS. The subjective Likert-scale ratings from each group also demonstrated a clear preference for 3D LVS. New 3D LVS has the potential to improve the learning curve, and reduce the operating time and error rate during the performances of laparoscopic surgeons. Our results suggest that the new-generation 3D HD LVS will be helpful for surgeons in laparoscopy (Clinical Trial ID: NCT01799577, Protocol ID: BEHGynobs-4).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bhayani SB, Andriole GL (2005) Three-dimensional (3D) vision: does it improve laparoscopic skills? An assessment of a 3D head-mounted visualization system. Rev Urol 7:211–214PubMedCentralPubMed Bhayani SB, Andriole GL (2005) Three-dimensional (3D) vision: does it improve laparoscopic skills? An assessment of a 3D head-mounted visualization system. Rev Urol 7:211–214PubMedCentralPubMed
2.
go back to reference Chan AC, Chung SC, Yim AP et al (1997) Comparison of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11:438–440PubMedCrossRef Chan AC, Chung SC, Yim AP et al (1997) Comparison of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11:438–440PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Byrn JC, Schluender S, Divino CM et al (2007) Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci Robot System. Am J Surg 193:519–522PubMedCrossRef Byrn JC, Schluender S, Divino CM et al (2007) Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci Robot System. Am J Surg 193:519–522PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ohuchida K, Kenmotsu H, Yamamoto A, Sawada K, Hayami T, Morooka K, Hoshino H, Uemura M, Konishi K, Yoshida D, Maeda T, Ieiri S, Tanoue K, Tanaka M, Hashizume M (2009) The effect of CyberDome, a novel three-dimensional dome-shaped display system, on laparoscopic procedures. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 4(2):125–132PubMedCrossRef Ohuchida K, Kenmotsu H, Yamamoto A, Sawada K, Hayami T, Morooka K, Hoshino H, Uemura M, Konishi K, Yoshida D, Maeda T, Ieiri S, Tanoue K, Tanaka M, Hashizume M (2009) The effect of CyberDome, a novel three-dimensional dome-shaped display system, on laparoscopic procedures. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 4(2):125–132PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Becker H, Melzer A, Schurr MO, Buess G (1993) 3D video techniques in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1(40–46):2 Becker H, Melzer A, Schurr MO, Buess G (1993) 3D video techniques in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1(40–46):2
6.
go back to reference Cicione A, Autorino R, Breda A, De Sio M, Damiano R, Fusco F, Greco F, Carvalho-Dias E, Mota P, Nogueira C, Pinho P, Mirone V, Correia-Pinto J, Rassweiler J, Lima E (2013) Three-dimensional versus standard laparoscopy: comparative assessment using a validated program for laparoscopic urologic skills. Urology 82(6):1444–1450PubMedCrossRef Cicione A, Autorino R, Breda A, De Sio M, Damiano R, Fusco F, Greco F, Carvalho-Dias E, Mota P, Nogueira C, Pinho P, Mirone V, Correia-Pinto J, Rassweiler J, Lima E (2013) Three-dimensional versus standard laparoscopy: comparative assessment using a validated program for laparoscopic urologic skills. Urology 82(6):1444–1450PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Patel HRH, Ribal MJ, Arya M, Nauth-Misir R, Joseph JV (2007) Is it worth revisiting laparoscopic three-dimensional visualization? a validated assessment original research article. Urology 70(1):47–49PubMedCrossRef Patel HRH, Ribal MJ, Arya M, Nauth-Misir R, Joseph JV (2007) Is it worth revisiting laparoscopic three-dimensional visualization? a validated assessment original research article. Urology 70(1):47–49PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Birkett DH, Josephs LG, Este-McDonald J (1994) A new 3D laparoscope in gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Endosc 8:1448–1451PubMedCrossRef Birkett DH, Josephs LG, Este-McDonald J (1994) A new 3D laparoscope in gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Endosc 8:1448–1451PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference van Bergen P, Kunert W, Schurr MO et al (1996) Comparative study of endoscopic 2D and 3D imaging systems. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 113:634–637PubMed van Bergen P, Kunert W, Schurr MO et al (1996) Comparative study of endoscopic 2D and 3D imaging systems. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 113:634–637PubMed
10.
go back to reference Taffinder N, Smith SG, Huber J et al (1999) The effect of a second generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 13:1087–1092PubMedCrossRef Taffinder N, Smith SG, Huber J et al (1999) The effect of a second generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 13:1087–1092PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sun CC, Chiu AW, Chen KK et al (2000) Assessment of a three-dimensional operating system with skill tests in a pelvic trainer. Urol Int 64:154–158PubMedCrossRef Sun CC, Chiu AW, Chen KK et al (2000) Assessment of a three-dimensional operating system with skill tests in a pelvic trainer. Urol Int 64:154–158PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Buchs NC, Volonte F, Pugin F, Toso C, Morel P (2013) Three-dimensional laparoscopy: a step toward advanced surgical navigation. Surg Endosc 27:692–693PubMedCrossRef Buchs NC, Volonte F, Pugin F, Toso C, Morel P (2013) Three-dimensional laparoscopy: a step toward advanced surgical navigation. Surg Endosc 27:692–693PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Durrani AF, Preminger GM (1994) Advanced endoscopic imaging: 3D laparoscopic endoscopy. Surg Technol Int 3:141–147PubMed Durrani AF, Preminger GM (1994) Advanced endoscopic imaging: 3D laparoscopic endoscopy. Surg Technol Int 3:141–147PubMed
14.
go back to reference Thomsen MN, Lang RD (2004) An experimental comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional endoscopic systems in a model. Arthroscopy 20:419–423PubMedCrossRef Thomsen MN, Lang RD (2004) An experimental comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional endoscopic systems in a model. Arthroscopy 20:419–423PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, Kirschniak A (2012) 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardized phantom tasks. Surg Endosc 26:1454–1460PubMedCrossRef Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, Kirschniak A (2012) 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardized phantom tasks. Surg Endosc 26:1454–1460PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Silvestri M, Simi M, Cavallotti C, Vatteroni M, Ferrari V, Freschi C, Valdastri P, Menciassi A, Dario P (2011) Autostereoscopic three-dimensional viewer evaluation through comparison with conventional interfaces in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 18(3):223–230PubMedCrossRef Silvestri M, Simi M, Cavallotti C, Vatteroni M, Ferrari V, Freschi C, Valdastri P, Menciassi A, Dario P (2011) Autostereoscopic three-dimensional viewer evaluation through comparison with conventional interfaces in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 18(3):223–230PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadiere GB, Nyssen AS (2007) Comparison of learning curves and skill transfer between classical and robotic laparoscopy according to the viewing conditions: implications for training. Am J Surg 194:115–121PubMedCrossRef Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadiere GB, Nyssen AS (2007) Comparison of learning curves and skill transfer between classical and robotic laparoscopy according to the viewing conditions: implications for training. Am J Surg 194:115–121PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Randomised study on influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 351:248–251PubMedCrossRef Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Randomised study on influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 351:248–251PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Coren S, Ward LM (1989) Sensation and perception. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Orlando, pp 17–19 Coren S, Ward LM (1989) Sensation and perception. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Orlando, pp 17–19
20.
go back to reference Khoshabeh R, Juang J, Talamini MA, Nguyen TQ (2012) Multiview glasses-free 3D laparoscopy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59(10):2859–2865PubMedCrossRef Khoshabeh R, Juang J, Talamini MA, Nguyen TQ (2012) Multiview glasses-free 3D laparoscopy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59(10):2859–2865PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gofrit ON, Mikhail AA, Zorn KC, Zagaja GP, Steinberg GD, Shalhav AL (2008) Surgeons’ perceptions and injuries during and after urologic laparoscopic surgery. Urology 71:404–407PubMedCrossRef Gofrit ON, Mikhail AA, Zorn KC, Zagaja GP, Steinberg GD, Shalhav AL (2008) Surgeons’ perceptions and injuries during and after urologic laparoscopic surgery. Urology 71:404–407PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Tanagho YS, Andriole GL, Paradis AG, Madison KM, Sandhu GS, Varela JE, Benway BM (2012) 2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22(9):865–870PubMedCrossRef Tanagho YS, Andriole GL, Paradis AG, Madison KM, Sandhu GS, Varela JE, Benway BM (2012) 2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22(9):865–870PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Crosthwaite G, Chung T, Dunkley P, Shimi S, Cuschieri A (1995) Comparison of direct vision and electronic two- and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 82:849–851PubMedCrossRef Crosthwaite G, Chung T, Dunkley P, Shimi S, Cuschieri A (1995) Comparison of direct vision and electronic two- and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 82:849–851PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rabin J (1995) Two eyes are better than one: binocular enhancement in the contrast domain. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 15:45–48PubMedCrossRef Rabin J (1995) Two eyes are better than one: binocular enhancement in the contrast domain. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 15:45–48PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pietrabissa A, Scarcello E, Mosca F (1994) Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video system for the trained endoscopic surgeon and the beginner. End Surg 2:315–317 Pietrabissa A, Scarcello E, Mosca F (1994) Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video system for the trained endoscopic surgeon and the beginner. End Surg 2:315–317
26.
go back to reference Cagenello R, Arditi A (1993) Binocular enhancement of visual acuity. J Opt Soc Am A 10:1841–1848CrossRef Cagenello R, Arditi A (1993) Binocular enhancement of visual acuity. J Opt Soc Am A 10:1841–1848CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Jones DB, Brewer JD, Soper NJ (1996) The influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6:191–197PubMedCrossRef Jones DB, Brewer JD, Soper NJ (1996) The influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6:191–197PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P et al (2002) Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 60:39–45PubMedCrossRef Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P et al (2002) Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 60:39–45PubMedCrossRef
29.
30.
go back to reference Mueller MD, Camartin C, Dreher E et al (1999) Three-dimensional laparoscopy: gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13:469–472PubMedCrossRef Mueller MD, Camartin C, Dreher E et al (1999) Three-dimensional laparoscopy: gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13:469–472PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ramanathan R, Salamanca JIM, Mandhani A, Leung RA, Rao SR, Berryhill R, Tewari A (2009) Does three-dimensional (3D) visualization improve the quality of assistance during robotic radical prostatectomy? World J Urol 27:95–99PubMedCrossRef Ramanathan R, Salamanca JIM, Mandhani A, Leung RA, Rao SR, Berryhill R, Tewari A (2009) Does three-dimensional (3D) visualization improve the quality of assistance during robotic radical prostatectomy? World J Urol 27:95–99PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kong SH, Oh BM, Yoon H, Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Chung SG, Shiraishi N, Kitano S, Yang HK (2010) Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera. Surg Endosc 24(5):1132–1143PubMedCrossRef Kong SH, Oh BM, Yoon H, Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Chung SG, Shiraishi N, Kitano S, Yang HK (2010) Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera. Surg Endosc 24(5):1132–1143PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Bilgen K, Ustun M, Karakahya M, Isik S, Sengul S, Cetinkunar S, Kucukpinar TH (2013) Comparison of 3D imaging and 2D imaging for performance time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(2):180–183PubMedCrossRef Bilgen K, Ustun M, Karakahya M, Isik S, Sengul S, Cetinkunar S, Kucukpinar TH (2013) Comparison of 3D imaging and 2D imaging for performance time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(2):180–183PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Wagner OJ, Hagen M, Kurmann A, Horgan S, Candinas D, Vorburger SA (2012) Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method. Surg Endosc 26(10):2961–2968PubMedCrossRef Wagner OJ, Hagen M, Kurmann A, Horgan S, Candinas D, Vorburger SA (2012) Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method. Surg Endosc 26(10):2961–2968PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
An assessment of the new generation three-dimensional high definition laparoscopic vision system on surgical skills: a randomized prospective study
Authors
Taner A. Usta
Aysel Ozkaynak
Ebru Kovalak
Erdinc Ergul
M. Murat Naki
Erdal Kaya
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3949-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2015 Go to the issue