Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2015

01-06-2015

Iatrogenic ureteral injury in colorectal cancer surgery: a nationwide study comparing laparoscopic and open approaches

Authors: Peter Andersen, Lars Maagaard Andersen, Lene H. Iversen

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Iatrogenic ureteral injury is a rare complication in colorectal surgery. We aimed to investigate the risk of ureteral injury among patients with colorectal cancer operated on with curative intent in Denmark with laparoscopic and open technique.

Method

The study was based on the Danish National Colorectal Cancer database (DCCG) and included patients treated with intended curative resection for colorectal cancer between 2005 and 2011. From the DCCG database, we extracted data on intraoperative urinary tract injuries. To identify urinary tract injuries not recognized at the time of surgery but within 30 days after surgery, we cross-linked data with the National Patient Registry. All ureteral injuries were confirmed by medical record review. Data were analyzed separately for colon and rectal cancer.

Results

A total of 18,474 patients had a resection for colorectal cancer. Eighty-two ureteral injuries were related to colorectal surgery. The rate of ureteral injuries in the entire cohort was 0.44 %, with 37 (0.59 %) injuries in the laparoscopic group (n = 6,291) and 45 (0.37 %) injuries in the open group (n = 12,183), (P = 0.03). No difference in ureteral injury was found in relation to surgical approach in colon cancer patients. In rectum cancer patients (n = 5,959), the laparoscopic approach was used in 1,899 patients, and 19 (1.00 %) had ureteral injuries, whereas 17 (0.42 %) of 4,060 patients who underwent an open resection had a ureteral injury. In multivariate analysis adjusted for age, gender, ASA score, BMI, tumor stage, preoperative chemo-radiation, calendar year, and specialty of the surgeon, the laparoscopic approach was associated with an increased risk of ureteral injury, OR = 2.67; 95 % CI 1.26–5.65.

Conclusion

In this nationwide study laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer with curative intent was associated with a significantly increased risk of iatrogenic ureteral injury compared to open surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed
4.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2 CrossRefPubMed Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(05)66545-2 CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG, Brown JM (2013) Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:75–82. doi:10.1002/bjs.8945 CrossRefPubMed Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG, Brown JM (2013) Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:75–82. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​8945 CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645. doi:10.1002/bjs.7160 CrossRefPubMed Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​7160 CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, Nishiguchi Y, Maeda K, Hirakawa K (2012) A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. J Cancer 3:49–57. doi:10.7150/jca.3621 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, Nishiguchi Y, Maeda K, Hirakawa K (2012) A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. J Cancer 3:49–57. doi:10.​7150/​jca.​3621 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
10.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70221-7 CrossRefPubMed Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(05)70221-7 CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference McMahon AJ, Fullarton G, Baxter JN, O’Dwyer PJ (1995) Bile duct injury and bile leakage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 82:307–313CrossRefPubMed McMahon AJ, Fullarton G, Baxter JN, O’Dwyer PJ (1995) Bile duct injury and bile leakage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 82:307–313CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Richardson MC, Bell G, Fullarton GM (1996) Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases. West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group. Br J Surg 83:1356–1360CrossRefPubMed Richardson MC, Bell G, Fullarton GM (1996) Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases. West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group. Br J Surg 83:1356–1360CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Meyers WC, Branum GD, Farouk M, Grant JP, Helms MJ, Murray EA, Pappas TN, Peete WPJ, Pruthi RS, Albertson DA, Ferguson CM, Lucas G, Wilson JP, Copeland EM, Rout WR, Cerise EJ, Gansar GF, Richards WO, Sawyers JL, Sharp K, Dix J, Edge SB, Schirmer BD, Donald JM Jr, Donald TT, Viar WN Jr, Carmichael DJ, Gillis SP, McSwain GR, Baird DR, Lucas G, Luke JP, Mason E, Ruben DM, Wilson JP, Duncan T, Daugherty ME, Greenlee TH, Hillenmeyer K, Nighbert EJ, Stewart JD, Cerise EJ, Gansar GF, Bolton JS, Bowen JC, Aghazarian SG, Farha MJ, Fuchs JC, Hooper JH Jr, Haick AJ Jr, Koury AM, Meena AL, Petro AB, Voyles CR, Chalfan W, Crook JN, Brown AG, Cathcart RS, Gregorie HB, Parker TH, West HC, Anderson WJ, Ballinger J, Graves HA Jr, Nobels ER Jr, Beazley WS III, Clary R, Darden JR Jr (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The Southern Surgeons Club. N Engl J Med 324:1073–1078. doi:10.1056/NEJM199104183241601 Meyers WC, Branum GD, Farouk M, Grant JP, Helms MJ, Murray EA, Pappas TN, Peete WPJ, Pruthi RS, Albertson DA, Ferguson CM, Lucas G, Wilson JP, Copeland EM, Rout WR, Cerise EJ, Gansar GF,  Richards WO, Sawyers JL, Sharp K, Dix J, Edge SB, Schirmer BD, Donald JM Jr, Donald TT,  Viar WN Jr, Carmichael DJ, Gillis SP, McSwain GR, Baird DR, Lucas G, Luke JP, Mason E, Ruben DM, Wilson JP, Duncan T, Daugherty ME, Greenlee TH, Hillenmeyer K, Nighbert EJ, Stewart JD, Cerise EJ, Gansar GF, Bolton JS, Bowen JC, Aghazarian SG, Farha MJ, Fuchs JC, Hooper JH Jr, Haick AJ Jr, Koury AM, Meena AL, Petro AB, Voyles CR, Chalfan W, Crook JN, Brown AG, Cathcart RS, Gregorie HB, Parker TH, West HC, Anderson WJ,  Ballinger J, Graves HA Jr, Nobels ER Jr, Beazley WS III, Clary R, Darden JR Jr (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The Southern Surgeons Club. N Engl J Med 324:1073–1078. doi:10.​1056/​NEJM199104183241​601
14.
go back to reference Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, van Voorst S, Mol BW, Kluivers KB (2009) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003677. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4 PubMed Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, van Voorst S, Mol BW, Kluivers KB (2009) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003677. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD003677.​pub4 PubMed
15.
go back to reference Al-Awadi K, Kehinde EO, Al-Hunayan A, Al-Khayat A (2005) Iatrogenic ureteric injuries: incidence, aetiological factors and the effect of early management on subsequent outcome. Int Urol Nephrol 37:235–241. doi:10.1007/s11255-004-7970-4 CrossRefPubMed Al-Awadi K, Kehinde EO, Al-Hunayan A, Al-Khayat A (2005) Iatrogenic ureteric injuries: incidence, aetiological factors and the effect of early management on subsequent outcome. Int Urol Nephrol 37:235–241. doi:10.​1007/​s11255-004-7970-4 CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Halabi WJ, Jafari MD, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Pigazzi A, Stamos MJ (2014) Ureteral injuries in colorectal surgery: an analysis of trends, outcomes, and risk factors over a 10-year period in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 57:179–186. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000033 CrossRefPubMed Halabi WJ, Jafari MD, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Pigazzi A, Stamos MJ (2014) Ureteral injuries in colorectal surgery: an analysis of trends, outcomes, and risk factors over a 10-year period in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 57:179–186. doi:10.​1097/​DCR.​0000000000000033​ CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Wattiez A, Soriano D, Cohen SB, Nervo P, Canis M, Botchorishvili R, Mage G, Pouly JL, Mille P, Bruhat MA (2002) The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparative analysis of 1647 cases. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9:339–345CrossRefPubMed Wattiez A, Soriano D, Cohen SB, Nervo P, Canis M, Botchorishvili R, Mage G, Pouly JL, Mille P, Bruhat MA (2002) The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparative analysis of 1647 cases. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9:339–345CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Selzman AA, Spirnak JP (1996) Iatrogenic ureteral injuries: a 20-year experience in treating 165 injuries. J Urol 155:878–881CrossRefPubMed Selzman AA, Spirnak JP (1996) Iatrogenic ureteral injuries: a 20-year experience in treating 165 injuries. J Urol 155:878–881CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Goodno JA Jr, Powers TW, Harris VD (1995) Ureteral injury in gynecologic surgery: a ten-year review in a community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:1817–1820 discussion 1820–1822CrossRefPubMed Goodno JA Jr, Powers TW, Harris VD (1995) Ureteral injury in gynecologic surgery: a ten-year review in a community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:1817–1820 discussion 1820–1822CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
go back to reference Chahin F, Dwivedi AJ, Paramesh A, Chau W, Agrawal S, Chahin C, Kumar A, Tootla A, Tootla F, Silva YJ (2002) The implications of lighted ureteral stenting in laparoscopic colectomy. JSLS 6:49–52PubMedCentralPubMed Chahin F, Dwivedi AJ, Paramesh A, Chau W, Agrawal S, Chahin C, Kumar A, Tootla A, Tootla F, Silva YJ (2002) The implications of lighted ureteral stenting in laparoscopic colectomy. JSLS 6:49–52PubMedCentralPubMed
27.
go back to reference Bothwell WN, Bleicher RJ, Dent TL (1994) Prophylactic ureteral catheterization in colon surgery. A five-year review. Dis Colon Rectum 37:330–334CrossRefPubMed Bothwell WN, Bleicher RJ, Dent TL (1994) Prophylactic ureteral catheterization in colon surgery. A five-year review. Dis Colon Rectum 37:330–334CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Jelovsek JE, Chiung C, Chen G, Roberts SL, Paraiso MF, Falcone T (2007) Incidence of lower urinary tract injury at the time of total laparoscopic hysterectomy. JSLS 11:422–427PubMedCentralPubMed Jelovsek JE, Chiung C, Chen G, Roberts SL, Paraiso MF, Falcone T (2007) Incidence of lower urinary tract injury at the time of total laparoscopic hysterectomy. JSLS 11:422–427PubMedCentralPubMed
Metadata
Title
Iatrogenic ureteral injury in colorectal cancer surgery: a nationwide study comparing laparoscopic and open approaches
Authors
Peter Andersen
Lars Maagaard Andersen
Lene H. Iversen
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3814-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2015 Go to the issue