Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2014

01-01-2014 | Review

Robotic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence

Author: E. H. Aly

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Several studies have confirmed that laparoscopic colorectal surgery results in improved early post-operative outcomes. Nevertheless, conventional laparoscopic approach and instruments have several limitations. Robotic approach could potentially address of many of these limitations.

Objectives

This review aims to present a summary of the current evidence on the role of robotic colorectal surgery.

Methods

A comprehensive search of electronic databases (Pubmed, Science Direct and Google scholar) using the key words “rectal surgery”, “laparoscopic”, “colonic” and “robotic.” Evidence from these data was critically analysed and summarised to produce this article.

Results

Robotic colorectal surgery is both safe and feasible. However, it has no clear advantages over standard laparoscopic colorectal surgery in terms of early postoperative outcomes or complications profile. It has shorter learning curve but increased operative time and cost. It could offer potential advantage in resection of rectal cancer as it has a lower conversion rates even in obese individuals, distal rectal tumours and patients who had preoperative chemoradiotherpy. There is also a trend towards better outcome in anastomotic leak rates, circumferential margin positivity and perseveration of autonomic function, but there was no clear statistical significance to support this from the currently available data.

Conclusion

The use of robotic approach seems to be capable of addressing most of the shortcomings of the standard laparoscopic surgery. The technique has proved its safety profile in both colonic and rectal surgery. However, the cost involved may restrict its use to patients with challenging rectal cancer and in specialist centres.
Literature
1.
Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359(9325):2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
2.
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726PubMedCrossRef
3.
Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WCJ, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484PubMedCrossRef
4.
Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91(9):1111–1124PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
7.
8.
Delaney CP, Lynch AC, Senagore AJ, Fazio VW (2003) Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 46(12):1633–1639PubMedCrossRef
9.
Choi DJ, Kim SH, Lee PJM, Kim J, Woo SU (2009) Single-stage totally robotic dissection for rectal cancer surgery: technique and short-term outcome in 50 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 52(11):1824–1830PubMedCrossRef
10.
Cecil TD, Taffinder N, Gudgeon AM (2006) A personal view on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Color Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol Gt Br Irel 8(3):30–32
11.
Van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, et al. (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol.
12.
Shearer R, Gale M, Aly OE, Aly EH. (2013) Have early post-operative complications from laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery improved over the past 20 years? Color. Dis. Off. J. Assoc. Coloproctology Gt. Br. Irel.
13.
Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM, Lee WJ, Kim NK, Sohn SK et al (2008) Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc 22(7):1601–1608PubMedCrossRef
14.
Baik SH, Lee WJ, Rha KH, Kim NK, Sohn SK, Chi HS et al (2008) Robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using four robotic arms. Surg Endosc 22(3):792–797PubMedCrossRef
15.
Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F, Quarati R, Testa S (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51(11):1627–1632PubMedCrossRef
16.
Scarpinata R, Aly EH (2013) Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes? Dis Colon Rectum 56(2):253–262PubMedCrossRef
17.
Fung AK-Y, Aly EH (2012) Systematic review of single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery. Br J Surg 99(10):1353–1364PubMedCrossRef
18.
Ballantyne GH, Moll F (2003) The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. Surg Clin North Am 83(6):1293–1304, viiPubMedCrossRef
19.
Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC (2004) Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239(1):14–21PubMedCrossRef
20.
21.
Hellan M, Anderson C, Ellenhorn JDI, Paz B, Pigazzi A (2007) Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14(11):3168–3173PubMedCrossRef
22.
23.
Kim N-K, Kang J (2010) Optimal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the role of robotic surgery from an expert’s view. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 26(6):377–387PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
24.
Fung AK-Y, Aly EH (2013) Robotic colonic surgery: is it advisable to commence a new learning curve? Dis Colon Rectum 56(6):786–796PubMedCrossRef
25.
Ragupathi M, Ramos-Valadez DI, Pedraza R, Haas EM (2010) Robotic-assisted single-incision laparoscopic partial cecectomy. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg Mrcas 6(3):362–367CrossRef
26.
Park JS, Choi G-S, Park SY, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP (2012) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg 99(9):1219–1226PubMedCrossRef
27.
Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH (2002) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45(12):1689–1694, discussion 1695–1696PubMedCrossRef
28.
D’Annibale A, Pernazza G, Morpurgo E, Monsellato I, Pende V, Lucandri G et al (2010) Robotic right colon resection: evaluation of first 50 consecutive cases for malignant disease. Ann Surg Oncol 17(11):2856–2862PubMedCrossRef
29.
DeSouza AL, Prasad LM, Park JJ, Marecik SJ, Blumetti J, Abcarian H (2010) Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? Dis Colon Rectum 53(7):1000–1006PubMedCrossRef
30.
Averbach M, Popoutchi P, Marques OW Jr, Abdalla RZ, Podgaec S, Abrão MS (2010) Robotic rectosigmoidectomy—pioneer case report in Brazil. Current scene in colorectal robotic surgery. Arq Gastroenterol 47(1):116–118PubMedCrossRef
31.
32.
DeNoto G, Rubach E, Ravikumar TS (2006) A standardized technique for robotically performed sigmoid colectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16(6):551–556PubMedCrossRef
33.
Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, Hur H, Sohn SK, Cho CH et al (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16(6):1480–1487PubMedCrossRef
34.
Kwak JM, Kim SG (2012) The technique of single-stage totally robotic low anterior resection. J Robotic Surg 5:2
35.
36.
Abodeely A, Lagares-Garcia JA, Duron V, Vrees M (2010) Safety and learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery. J Robot Surg 4(3):161–165
37.
Giulianotti, P. C.; Coratti, A.; Angelini, M.; et al. (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777-784
38.
Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Haas EM (2011) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25(3):855–860PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
39.
Aly OE, Quayyum Z (2012) Has laparoscopic colorectal surgery become more cost-effective over time? Int J Colorectal Dis 27(7):855–860PubMedCrossRef
40.
Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef
41.
Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Müller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Online 3, CD003145
42.
Simons AJ, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Franklin M, Fleshman J, Geis WP et al (1995) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy learning curve. Dis Colon Rectum 38(6):600–603PubMedCrossRef
43.
Köckerling F, Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Bärlehner E, Köhler L, Bruch HP et al (2000) Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: early postoperative results of a prospective study involving 116 patients. The Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group. Dis Colon Rectum 43(11):1503–1511PubMedCrossRef
44.
Albert MR, Atallah SB, DeBeche-Adams TC, Izfar S, Larach SW (2013) Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 56(3):301–307PubMedCrossRef
45.
Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A, Valvo M, Ceccarelli G, Casciola L et al (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1614–1620PubMedCrossRef
46.
Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, Spaziani A, Biancafarina A, Casciola L (2009) Short- and medium-term outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection. Jsls J Soc Laparoendosc Surg Soc Laparoendosc Surg 13(2):176–183
47.
Baek J-H, Pastor C, Pigazzi A (2011) Robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 25(2):521–525PubMedCrossRef
48.
Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, Son DN, Baek SJ, Cho JS (2011) Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case–control study. Dis Colon Rectum 54(2):151–156PubMedCrossRef
49.
Leong QM, Son DN, Cho JS, Baek SJ, Kwak JM, Amar AH et al (2011) Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 25(9):2987–2992PubMedCrossRef
50.
Leong QM, Kim SH (2011) Robot-assisted rectal surgery for malignancy: a review of current literature. Ann Acad Med Singapore 40(10):460–466PubMed
51.
Ng KH, Lim YK, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Eu KW (2009) Robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal dissection: from better views to better outcome. Singapore Med J 50(8):763–767PubMed
52.
Park JS, Choi G-S, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2010) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 17(12):3195–3202PubMedCrossRef
53.
Kang J, Min BS, Park YA, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK et al (2011) Risk factor analysis of postoperative complications after robotic rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 35(11):2555–2562PubMedCrossRef
54.
Hottenrott C (2011) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer and cost-effectiveness analysis. Surg Endosc 25(12):3954–3956, author reply 3957–3958PubMedCrossRef
55.
Atallah SB, Albert MR, de Beche-Adams TH, Larach SW (2011) Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery in a cadaveric model. Tech Coloproctology 15(4):461–464CrossRef
56.
Hompes R, Rauh SM, Hagen ME, Mortensen NJ (2012) Preclinical cadaveric study of transanal endoscopic da Vinci® surgery. Br J Surg 99(8):1144–1148PubMedCrossRef
57.
Buchs NC, Pugin F, Ris F, Volonte F, Morel P, Roche B. (2013) Early experience with robotic rectopexy. Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surg. MRCAS. DOI: 10.​1002/​rcs.​1498
Metadata
Title
Robotic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence
Author
E. H. Aly
Publication date
01-01-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-013-1764-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2014 Go to the issue

Original Article

Preoperative adipocytokines as a predictor of surgical infection after colorectal surgery: a prospective survey

Original Article

Survival after resection of liver and lung colorectal metastases in the era of modern multidisciplinary therapy

Original Article

Short-term follow-up after laparoscopic versus conventional total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer in a large teaching hospital

Original Article

Fecal calprotectin, MMP-9, and human beta-defensin-2 levels in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

Original Article

Laparoscopic sphincter-preserving surgery (intersphincteric resection) after neoadjuvant imatinib treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the rectum

Original Article

Gefitinib enhances the effects of combined radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil in a colorectal cancer cell line