Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2014

01-05-2014

Ergonomic assessment of the French and American position for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the MIS Suite

Authors: Kelvin H. Kramp, Marc J. van Det, Eric R. Totte, Christiaan Hoff, Jean-Pierre E. N. Pierie

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cholecystectomy was one of the first surgical procedures to be performed with laparoscopy in the 1980s. Currently, two operation setups generally are used to perform a laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the French and the American position. In the French position, the patient lies in the lithotomy position, whereas in the American position, the patient lies supine with the left arm in abduction. To find an ergonomic difference between the two operation setups the movements of the surgeon’s vertebral column were analyzed in a crossover study.

Methods

The posture of the surgeon’s vertebral column was recorded intraoperatively using an electromagnetic motion-tracking system with three sensors attached to the head and to the trunk at the levels of Th1 and S1. A three-dimensional posture analysis of the cervical and thoracolumbar spine was performed to evaluate four surgeons removing a gallbladder in the French and American position. The body angles assessed were flexion/extension of the cervical and thoracolumbar spine, axial rotation of the cervical and thoracolumbar spine, lateroflexion of the cervical and thoracolumbar spine, and the orientation of the head in the sagittal plane. For each body angle, the mean, the percentage of operation time within an ergonomic acceptable range, and the relative frequencies were calculated and compared.

Results

No statistical difference was observed in the mean body angles or in the percentages of operation time within an acceptable range between the French and the American position. The relative frequencies of the body angles might indicate a trend toward slight thoracolumbar flexion in the French position.

Conclusion

In a modern dedicated minimally invasive surgery suite, the body posture of the neck and trunk and the orientation of the head did not differ significantly between the French and American position.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Berggren U, Gordh T, Grama D, Haglund U, Rastad J, Arvidsson D (1994) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia, and trauma responses. Br J Surg 81:1362–1365PubMedCrossRef Berggren U, Gordh T, Grama D, Haglund U, Rastad J, Arvidsson D (1994) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia, and trauma responses. Br J Surg 81:1362–1365PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hendolin HI, Paakonen ME, Alhava EM, Tarvainen R, Kemppinen T, Lahtinen P (2000) Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response. Eur J Surg 166:394–399PubMedCrossRef Hendolin HI, Paakonen ME, Alhava EM, Tarvainen R, Kemppinen T, Lahtinen P (2000) Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response. Eur J Surg 166:394–399PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Richards C, Edwards J, Culver D, Emori TG, Tolson J, Gaynes R (2003) Does using a laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy decrease the risk of surgical site infection? Ann Surg 237:358–362PubMedCentralPubMed Richards C, Edwards J, Culver D, Emori TG, Tolson J, Gaynes R (2003) Does using a laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy decrease the risk of surgical site infection? Ann Surg 237:358–362PubMedCentralPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schellekens PC, Bijnen AB, Honing M, Lourens J, de Ruiter P (1995) Results of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on morbidity and mortality of gallbladder surgery in a large regional hospital. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 139:723–727PubMed Schellekens PC, Bijnen AB, Honing M, Lourens J, de Ruiter P (1995) Results of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on morbidity and mortality of gallbladder surgery in a large regional hospital. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 139:723–727PubMed
5.
go back to reference Park A, Lee G, Seagull J, Meenagham N, Dexter D (2010) Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg 210:306–313PubMedCrossRef Park A, Lee G, Seagull J, Meenagham N, Dexter D (2010) Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg 210:306–313PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Erfanian K, Luks FI, Kurkchubasche AG, Wesselhoeft CW Jr, Tracy TF Jr (2003) In-line image projection accelerates task performance in laparoscopic appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg 38:1059–1062PubMedCrossRef Erfanian K, Luks FI, Kurkchubasche AG, Wesselhoeft CW Jr, Tracy TF Jr (2003) In-line image projection accelerates task performance in laparoscopic appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg 38:1059–1062PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hemal AK, Srinivas M, Charles AR (2001) Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopy. J Endourol 15:499–503PubMedCrossRef Hemal AK, Srinivas M, Charles AR (2001) Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopy. J Endourol 15:499–503PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Vereczkei A, Feussner H, Negele T, Fritzsche F, Seitz T, Bubb H, Horvath OP (2004) Ergonomic assessment of the static stress confronted by surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 18:1118–1122PubMed Vereczkei A, Feussner H, Negele T, Fritzsche F, Seitz T, Bubb H, Horvath OP (2004) Ergonomic assessment of the static stress confronted by surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 18:1118–1122PubMed
9.
go back to reference Van Det MJ, Meijerink WJHJ, Hoff C, Van Veelen MA, Pierie JPEN (2009) Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines. Surg Endosc 23:1279–1285PubMedCrossRef Van Det MJ, Meijerink WJHJ, Hoff C, Van Veelen MA, Pierie JPEN (2009) Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines. Surg Endosc 23:1279–1285PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Van Veelen MA, Jakimowicz JJ, Kazemier G (2004) Improved physical ergonomics of laparoscopic surgery. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 13:161–166CrossRef Van Veelen MA, Jakimowicz JJ, Kazemier G (2004) Improved physical ergonomics of laparoscopic surgery. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 13:161–166CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mishra RK (2013) Textbook of practical laparoscopic surgery, 3rd edn. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi Mishra RK (2013) Textbook of practical laparoscopic surgery, 3rd edn. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi
12.
go back to reference Youssef Y, Lee G, Godinez C, Sutton E, Klein RV, George IM, Seagull FJ, Park A (2011) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses physical injury risk to surgeons: analysis of hand technique and standing position. Surg Endosc 25:2168–2174 Youssef Y, Lee G, Godinez C, Sutton E, Klein RV, George IM, Seagull FJ, Park A (2011) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses physical injury risk to surgeons: analysis of hand technique and standing position. Surg Endosc 25:2168–2174
Metadata
Title
Ergonomic assessment of the French and American position for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the MIS Suite
Authors
Kelvin H. Kramp
Marc J. van Det
Eric R. Totte
Christiaan Hoff
Jean-Pierre E. N. Pierie
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3353-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2014 Go to the issue