Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2012

Open Access 01-04-2012

Suturing intraabdominal organs: when do we cause tissue damage?

Authors: Sharon P. Rodrigues, Tim Horeman, Jenny Dankelman, John J. van den Dobbelsteen, Frank-Willem Jansen

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

It is generally assumed that safety of tissue manipulations during (laparoscopic) surgery is related to the magnitude of force that is exerted on the tissue. To provide trainees with performance feedback about tissue-handling skills, it is essential to define objective criteria for judging the safety of applied forces. To be of clinical relevance, these criteria should relate the applied forces to the risk of tissue damage. This experimental study was conducted to determine which tractive forces during suturing cause tissue damage in different types of porcine tissues.

Methods

Tractive forces were applied on eight different tissue types (fascia, aorta, vena cava, peritoneum, small and large bowel, uterus, and fallopian tube) of 10 different pigs by placing increasingly higher loads on sutures in the tissue. We determined the load at what tissue damage occurred through visual inspection of the tissue. For each tissue sample, three consecutive measurements were performed.

Results

The average maximum acceptable force varied between 11.43 N for fascia to 1.25 N for fallopian tube. The difference in allowable force between these two structures is almost tenfold. Small bowel can be handled with a tractive force almost 1.5-fold higher than large bowel.

Conclusions

Each tissue type was found to have its own individual range of acceptable maximum forces before visual tissue damage occurs. With the results presented in this study, it is possible to provide clinically relevant and validated feedback to trainees about their tissue-handling skills.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK et al (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236(4):458–463PubMedCrossRef Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK et al (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236(4):458–463PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91(2):146–150PubMedCrossRef Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91(2):146–150PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, Laycock R, Tesfay ST, Valentine RJ et al (2000) Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg 191(3):272–283PubMedCrossRef Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, Laycock R, Tesfay ST, Valentine RJ et al (2000) Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg 191(3):272–283PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Schooleman A, Dankelman J (2007) Friction dynamics of trocars. Surg Endosc 21(8):1338–1343PubMedCrossRef van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Schooleman A, Dankelman J (2007) Friction dynamics of trocars. Surg Endosc 21(8):1338–1343PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bholat OS, Haluck RS, Murray WB, Gorman PJ, Krummel TM (1999) Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery. J Am Coll Surg 189(4):349–355PubMedCrossRef Bholat OS, Haluck RS, Murray WB, Gorman PJ, Krummel TM (1999) Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery. J Am Coll Surg 189(4):349–355PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Westebring-van der Putten EP, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Goossens RH, Jakimowicz JJ, Dankelman J (2009) Effect of laparoscopic grasper force transmission ratio on grasp control. Surg Endosc 23(4):818–824PubMedCrossRef Westebring-van der Putten EP, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Goossens RH, Jakimowicz JJ, Dankelman J (2009) Effect of laparoscopic grasper force transmission ratio on grasp control. Surg Endosc 23(4):818–824PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Horeman T, Rodrigues SP, Jansen FW, Dankelman J, van den Dobbelsteen JJ (2010) Force measurement platform for training and assessment of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 24(12):3102–3108PubMedCrossRef Horeman T, Rodrigues SP, Jansen FW, Dankelman J, van den Dobbelsteen JJ (2010) Force measurement platform for training and assessment of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 24(12):3102–3108PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Heijnsdijk EA, van der Voort M, de Visser H, Dankelman J, Gouma DJ (2003) Inter- and intraindividual variabilities of perforation forces of human and pig bowel tissue. Surg Endosc 17(12):1923–1926PubMedCrossRef Heijnsdijk EA, van der Voort M, de Visser H, Dankelman J, Gouma DJ (2003) Inter- and intraindividual variabilities of perforation forces of human and pig bowel tissue. Surg Endosc 17(12):1923–1926PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference De S, Rosen J, Dagan A, Hannaford B, Swanson P, Sinanan M (2007) Assessment of tissue damage due to mechanical stresses. Int J Robot Res 26(11–12):1159–1171CrossRef De S, Rosen J, Dagan A, Hannaford B, Swanson P, Sinanan M (2007) Assessment of tissue damage due to mechanical stresses. Int J Robot Res 26(11–12):1159–1171CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rosen J, Brown JD, De S, Sinanan M, Hannaford B (2008) Biomechanical properties of abdominal organs in vivo and postmortem under compression loads. J Biomech Eng 130(2):021020PubMedCrossRef Rosen J, Brown JD, De S, Sinanan M, Hannaford B (2008) Biomechanical properties of abdominal organs in vivo and postmortem under compression loads. J Biomech Eng 130(2):021020PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Snedeker JG, Barbezat M, Niederer P, Schmidlin FR, Farshad M (2005) Strain energy density as a rupture criterion for the kidney: impact tests on porcine organs, finite element simulation, and a baseline comparison between human and porcine tissues. J Biomech 38:993–1001PubMedCrossRef Snedeker JG, Barbezat M, Niederer P, Schmidlin FR, Farshad M (2005) Strain energy density as a rupture criterion for the kidney: impact tests on porcine organs, finite element simulation, and a baseline comparison between human and porcine tissues. J Biomech 38:993–1001PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Suturing intraabdominal organs: when do we cause tissue damage?
Authors
Sharon P. Rodrigues
Tim Horeman
Jenny Dankelman
John J. van den Dobbelsteen
Frank-Willem Jansen
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1986-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2012 Go to the issue