Published in:
01-12-2006 | Letter to the editor
Conversion rate for laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time interval matter?
Author:
G. N. S. Srinivas
Published in:
Surgical Endoscopy
|
Issue 12/2006
Login to get access
Excerpt
I read the article by de Vries and colleagues with interest. Besides a few typographic mistakes in the text, Fig. 1, and Table 2, there was a discrepancy in the contents of a table and the text. For example, according to Table 1, the number of stents placed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in group 2 was more (5 of 15, 33.3%) than in group 3, contrary to the text. The key word “choledochocystolithiasis” (not available in the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)) is a little confusing. …