Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2006

01-12-2006 | Letter to the editor

Conversion rate for laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time interval matter?

Author: G. N. S. Srinivas

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2006

Login to get access

Excerpt

I read the article by de Vries and colleagues with interest. Besides a few typographic mistakes in the text, Fig. 1, and Table 2, there was a discrepancy in the contents of a table and the text. For example, according to Table 1, the number of stents placed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in group 2 was more (5 of 15, 33.3%) than in group 3, contrary to the text. The key word “choledochocystolithiasis” (not available in the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)) is a little confusing. …
Metadata
Title
Conversion rate for laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time interval matter?
Author
G. N. S. Srinivas
Publication date
01-12-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2006
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0716-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2006

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2006 Go to the issue