Published in:
01-01-2004 | Original Contribution
Strategy for Selection of Type of Operation for Rectal Prolapse Based on Clinical Criteria
Authors:
A. J. Brown, M.B., Ch.B., J. H. Anderson, M.D., R. F. McKee, M.D., I. G. Finlay, M.B., Ch.B.
Published in:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
|
Issue 1/2004
Login to get access
Abstract
PURPOSE:
Reports of outcome after surgery for rectal prolapse predominantly relate to single operative procedures. A single surgical operation is not appropriate for all patients with rectal prolapse. We describe a selective policy based on clinical criteria.
METHODS:
Patients were offered surgery according to the following broad clinical protocol. Those who were unfit for abdominal surgery had a perineal operation. The remainder had a suture abdominal rectopexy. A sigmoid resection was added for patients in whom incontinence was not a predominant symptom.
RESULTS:
Surgery was performed in 159 patients. Of these, 57 had a perineal operation, 65 had fixation rectopexy, and 37 had resection rectopexy. There were no in-hospital deaths, and major complications occurred in five patients (3.5 percent). Minimum follow-up was 3 years. Of the 143 patients with long-term follow-up, recurrence occurred in 7 (5 percent). Constipation increased from 41 to 43 percent (59–61/143) and incontinence decreased from 43 to 19 percent (61 to 27/143).
CONCLUSIONS:
A selective policy has improved outcome compared with reports of a single operation. Future studies might consider an objective method of selecting the type of operation for rectal prolapse.