Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2004

01-01-2004 | Original article

Effect of the angle between the optical axis of the endoscope and the instruments’ plane on monitor image and surgical performance

Authors: P. V. Patil, G. B. Hanna, A. Cuschieri

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to examine the effect of the angle between optical axis of the endoscope and the instruments’ plane (OAIP) on the monitor display angle (approach angle between the two instruments on a two-dimensional monitor) and endoscopic task performance. Methods: Two experiments were carried out in the Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester (ADEPT) using a standard two-dimensional video endoscopic system. In the first experiment, the monitor display angle was measured during use, with OAIP angles ranging between 0 and 80° (at 10° increments) and manipulation angles varying between 45 and 120° (at 15° increments). In the second experiment, 10 surgeons tied 500 intracorporeal knots with OAIP angles of 0° (optical axis in the same plane as the instruments), +15° and +30° (viewing above the instruments’ plane), and −15 and −30° (optical axis looking from below instruments’ plane). The end points were the execution time and knot quality score (KQS). Results: In the first experiment, instruments entered the visual field from lateral sides of the monitor with an apparent 180° monitor display angle with a 0° OAIP angle, whereas the monitor display angle approached the actual manipulation angle between the two needle drivers when an 80° OAIP angle was used. In the second experiment, the instruments appeared to enter the image field from the side of the surgeon when the endoscope viewed the instruments from above, whereas instruments entered the field from the opposite side to the surgeon when the endoscope viewed instruments’ plane from below. As a result, use of 0 and +15° OATP angles yielded significantly shorter execution times: 70 s compared to 83, 93, and 77 s for +30, −30, and −15° OAIP angles (p < 0.001), with KQS of 39° and 40 vs 38, 36, and 34%, respectively (p = 0.257). Conclusions: The angle between the optical axis of the endoscope and instruments’ plane determines how the instruments appear to enter the operative field. The monitor display angle between the instruments is different from the real manipulation angle unless the OAIP angle is near 80°. The apparent entry of instruments into the operative field becomes intuitive for the surgeon only if the endoscope is viewing from above or in the same plane as the instruments. Hence, the best performance for endoscopic knot tying is obtained with this configuration, and execution time increases significantly with viewing from below the instruments’ plane.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Emam, T, Frank, TG, Hanna, GB, Stockham, G, Cuschieri, A 1999Rocker handle for endoscopic needle drivers—technical and ergonomic evaluation of infrared motion analysis system.Surg Endosc13658661CrossRefPubMed Emam, T, Frank, TG, Hanna, GB, Stockham, G, Cuschieri, A 1999Rocker handle for endoscopic needle drivers—technical and ergonomic evaluation of infrared motion analysis system.Surg Endosc13658661CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hanna, GB, Cuschieri, A 1999Influence of optical axis-to-target view angle on endoscopic task performance.Surg Endosc13371375CrossRefPubMed Hanna, GB, Cuschieri, A 1999Influence of optical axis-to-target view angle on endoscopic task performance.Surg Endosc13371375CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hanna, GB, Drew, T, Clinch, P, Hunter, B, Cuschieri, A 1998Computer controlled endoscopic performance assessment system.Surg Endosc129971000CrossRefPubMed Hanna, GB, Drew, T, Clinch, P, Hunter, B, Cuschieri, A 1998Computer controlled endoscopic performance assessment system.Surg Endosc129971000CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hanna, GB, Frank, TG, Cuschieri, A 1997Objective assessment of endoscopic knot quality.Am J Surg174410413CrossRefPubMed Hanna, GB, Frank, TG, Cuschieri, A 1997Objective assessment of endoscopic knot quality.Am J Surg174410413CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hanna, GB, Shimi, S, Cuschieri, A 1997Optimal port locations for intracorporeal endoscopic knotting.Surg Endosc11397401CrossRefPubMed Hanna, GB, Shimi, S, Cuschieri, A 1997Optimal port locations for intracorporeal endoscopic knotting.Surg Endosc11397401CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference McIntyre, R, Driver, CP, Miller, S 1996The anterior abdominal wall in laparoscopic procedures and the limitations of laparoscopic simulators.Surg Endosc10411413CrossRefPubMed McIntyre, R, Driver, CP, Miller, S 1996The anterior abdominal wall in laparoscopic procedures and the limitations of laparoscopic simulators.Surg Endosc10411413CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effect of the angle between the optical axis of the endoscope and the instruments’ plane on monitor image and surgical performance
Authors
P. V. Patil
G. B. Hanna
A. Cuschieri
Publication date
01-01-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2004
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8769-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2004

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2004 Go to the issue