Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 8/2021

Open Access 01-08-2021 | Computed Tomography | Original Article – Cancer Research

Testicular cancer follow-up costs in Germany from 2000 to 2015

Authors: Thomas Michaeli, Julia Michaeli, Daniel Michaeli

Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | Issue 8/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Advances in testicular cancer screening and therapy increased 10-year survival to 97% despite a rising incidence; eventually expanding the population of survivors requiring follow-up. We analyzed 10-year follow-up costs after testicular cancer treatment in Germany during 2000, 2008, and 2015.

Methods

Testicular cancer follow-up guidelines were extracted from the European Association of Urology. Per patient costs were estimated with a micro-costing approach considering direct and indirect medical expenses derived from expert interviews, literature research, and official scales of tariffs. Three perspectives covering costs for patients, providers, and insurers were included to estimate societal costs. Cost progression was compared across cancer histology, stage, stakeholders, resource use, and follow-up years.

Results

Mean 10-year follow-up costs per patient for stage I seminomatous germ-cell tumors (SGCT) on surveillance declined from EUR 11,995 in 2000 to EUR 4,430 in 2015 (p < 0.001). Advanced SGCT spending shrank from EUR 13,866 to EUR 9,724 (p < 0.001). In contrast, expenditure for stage II SGCT increased from EUR 7,159 to EUR 9,724 (p < 0.001). While insurers covered 32% of costs in 2000, only 13% of costs were reimbursed in 2015 (p < 0.001). 70% of SGCT follow-up resources were consumed by medical imaging (x-ray, CT, ultrasound, FDG-PET). Spending was unevenly distributed across follow-up years (years 1–2: 50%, years 3–5: 39%, years 5–10: 11%).

Conclusions

The increasing prevalence of testicular cancer survivors caused German statutory insurers to cut per patient cost by up to 80% by budgeting services and decreasing reimbursement rates. The economic burden was gradually redistributed to patients and providers.
Literature
go back to reference Alfano CM, Jefford M, Maher J et al (2019) Building personalized cancer follow-up care pathways in the United States: lessons learned from implementation in England, Northern Ireland, and Australia. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book Am Soc Clin Oncol Annu Meet 39:625–639. https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_238267CrossRef Alfano CM, Jefford M, Maher J et al (2019) Building personalized cancer follow-up care pathways in the United States: lessons learned from implementation in England, Northern Ireland, and Australia. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book Am Soc Clin Oncol Annu Meet 39:625–639. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​EDBK_​238267CrossRef
go back to reference Böhm K, Mardorf S, Nöthen M et al (2009) Beiträge zur Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes - Gesundheit und Krankheit im Alter. Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin Böhm K, Mardorf S, Nöthen M et al (2009) Beiträge zur Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes - Gesundheit und Krankheit im Alter. Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin
go back to reference Brück D (1998) Kommentar zur Gebührenordnung für Ärzte (GOÄ). Deutscher Ärzteverlag Brück D (1998) Kommentar zur Gebührenordnung für Ärzte (GOÄ). Deutscher Ärzteverlag
go back to reference Clasen J, Schmidberger H, Souchon R et al (2009) What is the value of routine follow-up in stage I seminoma after paraaortic radiotherapy?: an analysis of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group (GTCSG) in 675 prospectively followed patients. Strahlenther Onkol Organ Dtsch Rontgengesellschaft Al 185:349–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-009-1958-zCrossRef Clasen J, Schmidberger H, Souchon R et al (2009) What is the value of routine follow-up in stage I seminoma after paraaortic radiotherapy?: an analysis of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group (GTCSG) in 675 prospectively followed patients. Strahlenther Onkol Organ Dtsch Rontgengesellschaft Al 185:349–354. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00066-009-1958-zCrossRef
go back to reference Cox CL, Oeffinger K, Montgomery M, Hudson MM, Leisenring W, Whitton J, Robison LL (2009) Determinants of mammography screening participation in adult childhood cancer survivors: results from the childhood cancer survivor study. Oncol Nurs Forum 36:335–344CrossRef Cox CL, Oeffinger K, Montgomery M, Hudson MM, Leisenring W, Whitton J, Robison LL (2009) Determinants of mammography screening participation in adult childhood cancer survivors: results from the childhood cancer survivor study. Oncol Nurs Forum 36:335–344CrossRef
go back to reference Curtis L (2008) Unit costs of health and social care 2008. Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury Curtis L (2008) Unit costs of health and social care 2008. Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury
go back to reference Curtis L, Burns A (2015) Unit costs of health and social care 2015. Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury Curtis L, Burns A (2015) Unit costs of health and social care 2015. Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury
go back to reference Gietema JA, Meinardi MT, Sleijfer DT et al (2002) Routine chest X-rays have no additional value in the detection of relapse during routine follow-up of patients treated with chemotherapy for disseminated non-seminomatous testicular cancer. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 13:1616–1620. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdf282CrossRef Gietema JA, Meinardi MT, Sleijfer DT et al (2002) Routine chest X-rays have no additional value in the detection of relapse during routine follow-up of patients treated with chemotherapy for disseminated non-seminomatous testicular cancer. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 13:1616–1620. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​annonc/​mdf282CrossRef
go back to reference Hasson Aljebori S, Yasen R (2019) Modeling the patients flow behavior in Hilla Emergency Departments. Int J Eng Technol 8:385–391 Hasson Aljebori S, Yasen R (2019) Modeling the patients flow behavior in Hilla Emergency Departments. Int J Eng Technol 8:385–391
go back to reference Kassenärtzliche Bundesvereinigung (2000) Einheitlicher Bewertungsmaßstab (EBM)—Stand: 1. Quartal 2000. Berlin Kassenärtzliche Bundesvereinigung (2000) Einheitlicher Bewertungsmaßstab (EBM)—Stand: 1. Quartal 2000. Berlin
go back to reference Kassenärtzliche Bundesvereinigung (2008) Einheitlicher Bewertungsmaßstab (EBM)—Stand: 1. Quartal 2008. Berlin Kassenärtzliche Bundesvereinigung (2008) Einheitlicher Bewertungsmaßstab (EBM)—Stand: 1. Quartal 2008. Berlin
go back to reference Kassenärtzliche Bundesvereinigung (2015) Einheitlicher Bewertungsmaßstab (EBM)—Stand: 1. Quartal 2015. Berlin Kassenärtzliche Bundesvereinigung (2015) Einheitlicher Bewertungsmaßstab (EBM)—Stand: 1. Quartal 2015. Berlin
go back to reference Mayer DK, Birken SA, Check DK, Chen RC (2015) Summing it up: an integrative review of studies of cancer survivorship care plans (2006–2013). Cancer 121:978–996CrossRef Mayer DK, Birken SA, Check DK, Chen RC (2015) Summing it up: an integrative review of studies of cancer survivorship care plans (2006–2013). Cancer 121:978–996CrossRef
go back to reference Nielsen JH, Olesen CR, Kristiansen TM, Bak CK, Overgaard C (2015) Reasons for women’s non-participation in follow-up screening after gestational diabetes. Women Birth J Aust Coll Midwives 28:e157–163CrossRef Nielsen JH, Olesen CR, Kristiansen TM, Bak CK, Overgaard C (2015) Reasons for women’s non-participation in follow-up screening after gestational diabetes. Women Birth J Aust Coll Midwives 28:e157–163CrossRef
go back to reference Netten A, Curtis L (2000) Unit costs of health and social care 2000. Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury Netten A, Curtis L (2000) Unit costs of health and social care 2000. Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury
go back to reference Plathow DC (2004) Teleradiologie in der diagnostischen und klinischen Radiologie: Grundlagen, aktueller Stand und betriebswirtschaftliche Aspekte in Deutschland, 4. Edition. Diplomarbeiten Agentur diplom.de Plathow DC (2004) Teleradiologie in der diagnostischen und klinischen Radiologie: Grundlagen, aktueller Stand und betriebswirtschaftliche Aspekte in Deutschland, 4. Edition. Diplomarbeiten Agentur diplom.de
go back to reference Radtke R (2019) Umfrage zur Wartezeit in deutschen Arztpraxen nach Krankenversicherung 2019. Statista Radtke R (2019) Umfrage zur Wartezeit in deutschen Arztpraxen nach Krankenversicherung 2019. Statista
go back to reference Randelhoff M (2011) Die wahren Kosten eines Kilometers Autofahrt. Zuk, Mobil Randelhoff M (2011) Die wahren Kosten eines Kilometers Autofahrt. Zuk, Mobil
go back to reference Robert Koch Institute (2020) Cancer in Germany 2015/2016, 12th Edition. Berlin Robert Koch Institute (2020) Cancer in Germany 2015/2016, 12th Edition. Berlin
go back to reference Sabatino SA, Thompson TD, Smith JL, Rowland JH, Forsythe LP, Pollack L, Hawkins NA (2013) Receipt of cancer treatment summaries and follow-up instructions among adult cancer survivors: results from a national survey. J Cancer Surviv Res Pract 7:32–43CrossRef Sabatino SA, Thompson TD, Smith JL, Rowland JH, Forsythe LP, Pollack L, Hawkins NA (2013) Receipt of cancer treatment summaries and follow-up instructions among adult cancer survivors: results from a national survey. J Cancer Surviv Res Pract 7:32–43CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Testicular cancer follow-up costs in Germany from 2000 to 2015
Authors
Thomas Michaeli
Julia Michaeli
Daniel Michaeli
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology / Issue 8/2021
Print ISSN: 0171-5216
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1335
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03643-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2021

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 8/2021 Go to the issue