Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 4/2010

01-04-2010 | Original Paper

Modified apical dissection of the prostate improves early continence in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique and initial results

Authors: Xin Gao, Ke-Bing Wang, Xiao-Yong Pu, Xiang-Fu Zhou, Jian-Guang Qiu

Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) is one of the greatest worries for all patients. One of the possible reasons for this urinary incontinence is a postoperative deficiency of the external striated urethral sphincter (EUS) complex and continence nerves. This study evaluated the application of a modified simple technique to dissection of the apical prostate in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and assessed the rate of urinary continence.

Methods

A total of 104 patients were randomly selected using envelopes and enrolled in this study. A standard LRP was performed in 52 patients (standard LRP group) and a modified technique for simple dissection of the apical prostate in LRP was performed in another 52 patients (modified LRP group). The urethra was dissected and transected at the apex of the prostate, proximal to the nerve-distributing rhabdosphincter using sharp scissors to avoid damage to the EUS complex and continence nerves. In all patients, a pad test was performed on 3, 30 and 90 days postoperatively and correlated with urinary continence. Continence was defined as zero pads or a liner used for security reasons only.

Results

After catheter removal, the continence rates were regained in 66, 85 and 96% of patients in the modified LRP group compared with 28, 55 and 91% of the patients in the standard LRP group at 3, 30 and 90 days, respectively. A statistically significant difference was present at 3 and 30 days (p < 0.01, respectively). At 90 days, the difference, although still present, was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

In this preliminary study, the technique of simplified apical dissection of the prostate in LRP appears to be an easy and feasible technique in early recovery of urinary continence. Further long-term and larger sample studies are necessary to elucidate the modified technique in LRP on early restoration of urinary continence.
Literature
go back to reference Box GN, Ahlering TE (2008) Robotic radical prostatectomy: long-term outcomes. Curr Opin Urol 18:173–179CrossRefPubMed Box GN, Ahlering TE (2008) Robotic radical prostatectomy: long-term outcomes. Curr Opin Urol 18:173–179CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Coakley FV, Eberhardt S, Kattan MW et al (2002) Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship with membranous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 168:1032–1035CrossRefPubMed Coakley FV, Eberhardt S, Kattan MW et al (2002) Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship with membranous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 168:1032–1035CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Creed KE, Van der Werf BA, Kaye KW (1998) Innervation of the striated muscle of the membranous urethra of the male dog. J Urol 159:1712–1716CrossRefPubMed Creed KE, Van der Werf BA, Kaye KW (1998) Innervation of the striated muscle of the membranous urethra of the male dog. J Urol 159:1712–1716CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Dasgupta P, Patil K, Anderson C, Kirby R (2008) Transition from open to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 101:667–668CrossRefPubMed Dasgupta P, Patil K, Anderson C, Kirby R (2008) Transition from open to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 101:667–668CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Deliveliotis C, Protogerou V, Alargof E, Varkarakis J (2002) Radical prostatectomy: bladder neck preservation and puboprostatic ligament sparing—effects on continence and positive margins. Urology 60:855–858CrossRefPubMed Deliveliotis C, Protogerou V, Alargof E, Varkarakis J (2002) Radical prostatectomy: bladder neck preservation and puboprostatic ligament sparing—effects on continence and positive margins. Urology 60:855–858CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ficazzola MA, Nitti VW (1998) The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with urodynamic findings. J Urol 160:1317–1320CrossRefPubMed Ficazzola MA, Nitti VW (1998) The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with urodynamic findings. J Urol 160:1317–1320CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gillitzer R, Thuroff JW (2003) Technical advances in radical retropubic prostatectomy techniques for avoiding complications. Part II. Vesico-urethral anastomosis and nerve-sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int 92:178–184CrossRefPubMed Gillitzer R, Thuroff JW (2003) Technical advances in radical retropubic prostatectomy techniques for avoiding complications. Part II. Vesico-urethral anastomosis and nerve-sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int 92:178–184CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gregori A, Simonato A, Lissiani A et al (2003) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative complications in an initial and consecutive series of 80 cases. Eur Urol 44:190–194 discussion 194CrossRefPubMed Gregori A, Simonato A, Lissiani A et al (2003) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative complications in an initial and consecutive series of 80 cases. Eur Urol 44:190–194 discussion 194CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Groutz A, Blaivas JG, Chaikin DC, Weiss JP, Verhaaren M (2000) The pathophysiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: a clinical and video urodynamic study. J Urol 163:1767–1770CrossRefPubMed Groutz A, Blaivas JG, Chaikin DC, Weiss JP, Verhaaren M (2000) The pathophysiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: a clinical and video urodynamic study. J Urol 163:1767–1770CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Rozet F, Vallancien G (1998) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary evaluation after 28 interventions. Presse Med 27:1570–1574PubMed Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Rozet F, Vallancien G (1998) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary evaluation after 28 interventions. Presse Med 27:1570–1574PubMed
go back to reference Hollabaugh RS Jr, Dmochowski RR, Kneib TG, Steiner MS (1998) Preservation of putative continence nerves during radical retropubic prostatectomy leads to more rapid return of urinary continence. Urology 51:960–967CrossRefPubMed Hollabaugh RS Jr, Dmochowski RR, Kneib TG, Steiner MS (1998) Preservation of putative continence nerves during radical retropubic prostatectomy leads to more rapid return of urinary continence. Urology 51:960–967CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Horie S, Tobisu KI, Fujimoto H, Doi N, Kakizoe T (1999) Urinary incontinence after non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation. Urology 53:561–567CrossRefPubMed Horie S, Tobisu KI, Fujimoto H, Doi N, Kakizoe T (1999) Urinary incontinence after non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation. Urology 53:561–567CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference John H, Hauri D (2000) Seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy: a novel concept to restore early urinary continence. Urology 55:820–824CrossRefPubMed John H, Hauri D (2000) Seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy: a novel concept to restore early urinary continence. Urology 55:820–824CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Myers RP (2001) Radical prostatectomy: making it a better operation in the new millennium. Int J Urol 8:S9–S14CrossRefPubMed Myers RP (2001) Radical prostatectomy: making it a better operation in the new millennium. Int J Urol 8:S9–S14CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nguyen L, Jhaveri J, Tewari A (2008) Surgical technique to overcome anatomical shortcoming: balancing post-prostatectomy continence outcomes of urethral sphincter lengths on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 179:1907–1911CrossRefPubMed Nguyen L, Jhaveri J, Tewari A (2008) Surgical technique to overcome anatomical shortcoming: balancing post-prostatectomy continence outcomes of urethral sphincter lengths on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 179:1907–1911CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Poore RE, McCullough DL, Jarow JP (1998) Puboprostatic ligament sparing improves urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 51:67–72CrossRefPubMed Poore RE, McCullough DL, Jarow JP (1998) Puboprostatic ligament sparing improves urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 51:67–72CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pu XY, Wang XH, Wu YL, Wang HP (2007) Comparative study of the impact of 3- versus 8-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 133:555–562CrossRefPubMed Pu XY, Wang XH, Wu YL, Wang HP (2007) Comparative study of the impact of 3- versus 8-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 133:555–562CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O et al (2001) Heilbronn laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technique and results after 100 cases. Eur Urol 40:54–64CrossRefPubMed Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O et al (2001) Heilbronn laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technique and results after 100 cases. Eur Urol 40:54–64CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rassweiler J, Hruza M, Teber D, Su LM (2006) Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy—critical analysis of the results. Eur Urol 49:612–624CrossRefPubMed Rassweiler J, Hruza M, Teber D, Su LM (2006) Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy—critical analysis of the results. Eur Urol 49:612–624CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P et al (2006) Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 175:2201–2206CrossRefPubMed Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P et al (2006) Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 175:2201–2206CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rocco B, Gregori A, Stener S et al (2007a) Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 51:996–1003CrossRefPubMed Rocco B, Gregori A, Stener S et al (2007a) Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 51:996–1003CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P et al (2007b) Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter. Eur Urol 52:376–383CrossRefPubMed Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P et al (2007b) Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter. Eur Urol 52:376–383CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schuessler W, Kavoussi L, Clayman R et al (1992) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial case report. J Urol 147:246A Schuessler W, Kavoussi L, Clayman R et al (1992) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial case report. J Urol 147:246A
go back to reference Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS et al (2000) Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. JAMA 283:354–360CrossRefPubMed Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS et al (2000) Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. JAMA 283:354–360CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Steiner MS (2000a) Anatomic basis for the continence-preserving radical retropubic prostatectomy. Semin Urol Oncol 18:9–18PubMed Steiner MS (2000a) Anatomic basis for the continence-preserving radical retropubic prostatectomy. Semin Urol Oncol 18:9–18PubMed
go back to reference Steiner MS (2000b) Continence-preserving anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 55:427–435CrossRefPubMed Steiner MS (2000b) Continence-preserving anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 55:427–435CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Steiner MS (2000c) Continence-preserving anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy: the “No-Touch” technique. Curr Urol Rep 1:20–27CrossRefPubMed Steiner MS (2000c) Continence-preserving anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy: the “No-Touch” technique. Curr Urol Rep 1:20–27CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN, Rabenalt R et al (2006) Nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy—effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins. Eur Urol 49:103–111 discussion 111-102CrossRefPubMed Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN, Rabenalt R et al (2006) Nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy—effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins. Eur Urol 49:103–111 discussion 111-102CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Touijer K, Guillonneau B (2006) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a critical analysis of surgical quality. Eur Urol 49:625–632CrossRefPubMed Touijer K, Guillonneau B (2006) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a critical analysis of surgical quality. Eur Urol 49:625–632CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Walsh PC (1997) Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Stamey TA (eds) Campbell’s urology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 2565–2588 Walsh PC (1997) Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Stamey TA (eds) Campbell’s urology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 2565–2588
Metadata
Title
Modified apical dissection of the prostate improves early continence in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique and initial results
Authors
Xin Gao
Ke-Bing Wang
Xiao-Yong Pu
Xiang-Fu Zhou
Jian-Guang Qiu
Publication date
01-04-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0171-5216
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1335
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0683-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 4/2010 Go to the issue