Top

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

Published in:

01-02-2020 | Laparoscopy | Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

Comparison of short-term surgical outcome between 3D and 2D laparoscopy surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Bochao Zhao, Wu Lv, Di Mei, Rui Luo, Shiyang Bao, Baojun Huang, Jie Lin

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 1/2020

Abstract

Background

Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic surgery is becoming more popular with the development of laparoscopic devices. The objective of this study was to explore whether the 3D imaging system could improve surgical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal cancer compared with the 2D imaging system.

Methods

Systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase databases and relevant data were extracted. Surgical quality, postoperative complications, and postoperative recovery between 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery groups were compared using a fixed or random effect model.

Results

A total of 12 studies involving 1456 patients (3D group 683 patients and 2D group 773 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicated that mean operation time was significantly shorter in 3D group than in 2D group (WMD, − 9.08; 95% CI, − 14.77, − 3.40; P = 0.002; I² = 70.3%), especially for gastric cancer patients (WMD, − 14.61; 95% CI, − 26.00, − 3.23, P = 0.012; I² = 74.1%). In addition, 3D laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer had an advantage than 2D group in reducing the amount of intraoperative blood loss (WMD, − 13.60, 95% CI, − 21.48, − 5.72; P = 0.001; I² = 0%). The number of retrieved lymph nodes in 3D group was not significantly different from that in 2D group, regardless of laparoscopic gastrectomy (WMD, 1.10; 95% CI, − 0.67, 2.88; P = 0.222; I² = 18.8%) and laparoscopic colorectal surgery (WMD, 0.55, 95% CI; − 1.99, 3.09; P = 0.671; I² = 76.9%). In addition, there was no significant difference between 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for postoperative complications and postoperative recovery.

Conclusion

Main advantages of 3D laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer were that it could shorten the operation time and reduce the amount of intraoperative blood loss. However, 3D laparoscopic surgery had no obvious advantage over 2D laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer patients.

Available only for authorised users

van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14(3):210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70016-0 CrossRefPubMed

Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song KY, Lee SI, Ryu SY, Lee JH, Lee HJ (2016) Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 263(1):28–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000001346 CrossRefPubMed

Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S, Futawatari N, Katada N, Watanabe M, Okutomi T, Wang G, Bax L (2013) Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by expert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese patients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 27(5):1695–1705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2658-9 CrossRefPubMed

Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Kim W, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Song KY, Ryu SY (2014) Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 32(7):627–633. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.48.8551 CrossRefPubMed

Park DJ, Han SU, Hyung WJ, Kim MC, Kim W, Ryu SY, Ryu SW, Song KY, Lee HJ, Cho GS, Kim HH (2012) Long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large-scale multicenter retrospective study. Surg Endosc 26(6):1548–1553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2065-7 CrossRefPubMed

Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10(1):44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70310-3 CrossRefPubMed

Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11(7):637–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70131-5 CrossRefPubMed

Kim NK, Kim YW, Han YD, Cho MS, Hur H, Min BS, Lee KY (2016) Complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for colon cancer: principle, anatomy, surgical technique, and outcomes. Surg Oncol 25(3):252–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2016.05.009 CrossRefPubMed

Dirie NI, Wang Q, Wang S (2018) Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopic systems in urology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 32(9):781–790. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0411 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Yoon J, Kang SI, Kim MH, Kim MJ, Oh HK, Kim DW, Kang SB (2019) Comparison of short-term outcomes between 3D and 2D imaging laparoscopic colectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy for colon cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 29(3):340–345. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0317 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Ji G, Qi S, Ji F, Tao Y, Ma C, Fang X (2016) Comparative study of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in short-term efficacy. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 19(5):545–548PubMed

12.

Itatani Y, Obama K, Nishigori T, Ganeko R, Tsunoda S, Hosogi H, Hisamori S, Hashimoto K, Sakai Y (2019) Three-dimensional stereoscopic visualization shortens operative time in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Sci Rep 9(1):4108. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40269-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Liu J, Zhou H, Qin H, Ru H, Huang J, Liang S, Mo X, Tang W (2018) Comparative study of clinical efficacy using three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopies in the treatment of distal gastric cancer. OncoTargets Ther 11:301–306. https://doi.org/10.2147/ott.s153520 CrossRef

14.

Su H, Jin W, Wang P, Bao M, Wang X, Zhao C, Wang X, Zhou Z, Zhou H (2019) Comparing short-time outcomes of three-dimensional and two-dimensional totally laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer using overlapped delta-shaped anastomosis. OncoTargets Ther 12:669–675. https://doi.org/10.2147/ott.s187535 CrossRef

15.

Zheng CH, Lu J, Zheng HL, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, Chen QY, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang CM (2018) Comparison of 3D laparoscopic gastrectomy with a 2D procedure for gastric cancer: a phase 3 randomized controlled trial. Surgery 163(2):300–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.09.053 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Goossen K, Tenckhoff S, Probst P, Grummich K, Mihaljevic AL, Buchler MW, Diener MK (2018) Optimal literature search for systematic reviews in surgery. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 403(1):119–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1646-x CrossRef

17.

Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, Savovic J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, Carpenter JR, Chan AW, Churchill R, Deeks JJ, Hrobjartsson A, Kirkham J, Juni P, Loke YK, Pigott TD, Ramsay CR, Regidor D, Rothstein HR, Sandhu L, Santaguida PL, Schunemann HJ, Shea B, Shrier I, Tugwell P, Turner L, Valentine JC, Waddington H, Waters E, Wells GA, Whiting PF, Higgins JP (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919 CrossRef

18.

Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng HY, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernan MA, Hopewell S, Hrobjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Juni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Shepperd S, Shrier I, Stewart LA, Tilling K, White IR, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898 CrossRef

19.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2010) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg (Lond Engl) 8(5):336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007 CrossRef

20.

Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-13 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Tao K, Liu X, Deng M, Shi W, Gao J (2016) Three-dimensional against 2-dimensional laparoscopic colectomy for right-sided colon cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26(4):324–327. https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0000000000000281 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Ji F, Fang X, Fei B (2017) Comparative study of 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal tumors. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 20(5):509–513PubMed

23.

Curro G, Cogliandolo A, Bartolotta M, Navarra G (2016) Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26(3):213–217. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2015.0557 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Zeng Q, Lei F, Gao Z, Wang Y, Gao QK (2017) Case-matched study of short-term effects of 3D vs 2D laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol 15(1):178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1247-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Kanaji S, Suzuki S, Harada H, Nishi M, Yamamoto M, Matsuda T, Oshikiri T, Nakamura T, Fujino Y, Tominaga M, Kakeji Y (2017) Comparison of two- and three-dimensional display for performance of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 402(3):493–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1574-9 CrossRef

26.

Lee Y, Lee CM, Jang YJ, Park S, Park SH, Mok YJ, Kim JH (2019) Comparison of short-term outcomes using three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 29(7):886–890. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0765 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Buia A, Stockhausen F, Filmann N, Hanisch E (2017) 3D vs. 2D imaging in laparoscopic surgery-an advantage? Results of standardised black box training in laparoscopic surgery. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 402(1):167–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1526-9 CrossRef

28.

Sahu D, Mathew MJ, Reddy PK (2014) 3D laparoscopy - help or hype; initial experience of a tertiary health centre. J Clin Diagn Res 8(7):Nc01–Nc03. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2014/8234.4543 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Smith R, Schwab K, Day A, Rockall T, Ballard K, Bailey M, Jourdan I (2014) Effect of passive polarizing three-dimensional displays on surgical performance for experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Br J Surg 101(11):1453–1459. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9601 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, Kirschniak A (2012) 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks. Surg Endosc 26(5):1454–1460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2055-9 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Curro G, La Malfa G, Lazzara S, Caizzone A, Fortugno A, Navarra G (2015) Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is surgeon experience relevant? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(7):566–570. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2014.0641 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Datta J, Lewis RS Jr, Mamtani R, Stripp D, Kelz RR, Drebin JA, Fraker DL, Karakousis GC, Roses RE (2014) Implications of inadequate lymph node staging in resectable gastric cancer: a contemporary analysis using the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer 120(18):2855–2865. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28780 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Onitilo AA, Stankowski RV, Engel JM, Doi SA (2013) Adequate lymph node recovery improves survival in colorectal cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 107(8):828–834. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23332 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Mueller MD, Camartin C, Dreher E, Hanggi W (1999) Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13(5):469–472CrossRef

35.

Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet (Lond Engl) 351(9098):248–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(97)08005-7 CrossRef

Title: Comparison of short-term surgical outcome between 3D and 2D laparoscopy surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Bochao Zhao
Wu Lv
Di Mei
Rui Luo
Shiyang Bao
Baojun Huang
Jie Lin
Publication date: 01-02-2020
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords: Laparoscopy
Colectomy
Colectomy
Gastrectomy
Gastric Cancer
Gastric Cancer
Gastrectomy
Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01853-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Comparison of short-term surgical outcome between 3D and 2D laparoscopy surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Pancreaticojejunostomy—a review of modern techniques

Gender comparison of clinical, histopathological, therapeutic and outcome factors in 185,967 colon cancer patients

Diffusion-weighted MRI predicts the histologic response for neoadjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer: a prospective study (DIFFERENT trial)

Role of lymphadenectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and treatment at high-volume centers in patients with resected pancreatic cancer—a distinct view on lymph node yield

Extended hepatic metastasectomy for renal cell carcinoma—new aspects in times of targeted therapy: a single-center experience over three decades

Development of a severe mesenteric traction syndrome during major abdominal surgery is associated with increased postoperative morbidity: Secondary data analysis on prospective cohorts