Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 4/2016

01-06-2016 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The type of preoperative biliary drainage predicts short-term outcome after major hepatectomy

Authors: Yoji Kishi, Kazuaki Shimada, Satoshi Nara, Minoru Esaki, Tomoo Kosuge

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) is increasingly preferred to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) for patients undergoing major hepatectomy including hemihepatectomy or trisectorectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection. The study was aimed to evaluate whether postoperative outcomes differed according to the types of biliary drainage.

Methods

Patients who underwent major hepatectomy with bile duct resection for biliary tract cancer between December 2000 and March 2015 were classified into four groups according to their initial biliary drainage type. The preoperative management and postoperative morbidity were compared.

Results

Totally, 280 patients were classified into the following groups: no biliary drainage (n = 109), PTBD (n = 99), ENBD (n = 28), and endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD; n = 44). Preoperative catheter management including tube exchange or additional tube placement due to cholangitis or poor drainage was most frequently required in the ERBD group (PTBD, 18 %; ENBD, 14 %; ERBD, 43 %; P < 0.01). By the time of hepatectomy, 141 patients underwent at least one PTBD (PTBD(+)) and 30 patients were managed only with endoscopic biliary drainage (PTBD(−)). The incidence of major postoperative morbidities (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III) in PTBD(+) and PTBD(−) group was 23 and 3 %, respectively (P = 0.01). A multivariate analysis among 171 patients with biliary drainage showed PTBD(+) (P = 0.04; odds ratio = 8.50; 95 % confidential interval [CI], 1.10–65.45) and red blood cells transfusion (P < 0.01; odds ratio = 2.72; 95 % CI, 1.22–6.09) were independent predictors of major morbidity.

Conclusion

The type of preoperative biliary drainage was associated with the perioperative outcomes of major hepatectomy. Sticking to endoscopic biliary drainage was associated with lower risk of postoperative major morbidity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Povoski SP, Karpeh MS Jr, Conlon KC, Blumgart LH, Brennan MF (1999) Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 230(2):131–142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Povoski SP, Karpeh MS Jr, Conlon KC, Blumgart LH, Brennan MF (1999) Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 230(2):131–142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Pisters PW, Hudec WA, Hess KR et al (2001) Effect of preoperative biliary decompression on pancreaticoduodenectomy-associated morbidity in 300 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 234(1):47–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pisters PW, Hudec WA, Hess KR et al (2001) Effect of preoperative biliary decompression on pancreaticoduodenectomy-associated morbidity in 300 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 234(1):47–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Martignoni ME, Wagner M, Krahenbuhl L et al (2001) Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on surgical outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 181(1):52–59, discussion 87 CrossRefPubMed Martignoni ME, Wagner M, Krahenbuhl L et al (2001) Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on surgical outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 181(1):52–59, discussion 87 CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Coates JM, Beal SH, Russo JE et al (2009) Negligible effect of selective preoperative biliary drainage on perioperative resuscitation, morbidity, and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 144(9):841–847. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.152 CrossRefPubMed Coates JM, Beal SH, Russo JE et al (2009) Negligible effect of selective preoperative biliary drainage on perioperative resuscitation, morbidity, and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 144(9):841–847. doi:10.​1001/​archsurg.​2009.​152 CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mezhir JJ, Brennan MF, Baser RE et al (2009) A matched case–control study of preoperative biliary drainage in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: routine drainage is not justified. J Gastrointest Surg 13(12):2163–2169. doi:10.1007/s11605-009-1046-9 CrossRefPubMed Mezhir JJ, Brennan MF, Baser RE et al (2009) A matched case–control study of preoperative biliary drainage in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: routine drainage is not justified. J Gastrointest Surg 13(12):2163–2169. doi:10.​1007/​s11605-009-1046-9 CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hatfield AR, Tobias R, Terblanche J et al (1982) Preoperative external biliary drainage in obstructive jaundice. A prospective controlled clinical trial. Lancet 2(8304):896–899CrossRefPubMed Hatfield AR, Tobias R, Terblanche J et al (1982) Preoperative external biliary drainage in obstructive jaundice. A prospective controlled clinical trial. Lancet 2(8304):896–899CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference McPherson GA, Benjamin IS, Hodgson HJ et al (1984) Pre-operative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: the results of a controlled trial. Br J Surg 71(5):371–375CrossRefPubMed McPherson GA, Benjamin IS, Hodgson HJ et al (1984) Pre-operative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: the results of a controlled trial. Br J Surg 71(5):371–375CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pitt HA, Gomes AS, Lois JF et al (1985) Does preoperative percutaneous biliary drainage reduce operative risk or increase hospital cost? Ann Surg 201(5):545–553CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pitt HA, Gomes AS, Lois JF et al (1985) Does preoperative percutaneous biliary drainage reduce operative risk or increase hospital cost? Ann Surg 201(5):545–553CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Hochwald SN, Burke EC, Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, Blumgart LH (1999) Association of preoperative biliary stenting with increased postoperative infectious complications in proximal cholangiocarcinoma. Arch Surg 134(3):261–266CrossRefPubMed Hochwald SN, Burke EC, Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, Blumgart LH (1999) Association of preoperative biliary stenting with increased postoperative infectious complications in proximal cholangiocarcinoma. Arch Surg 134(3):261–266CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cherqui D, Benoist S, Malassagne B et al (2000) Major liver resection for carcinoma in jaundiced patients without preoperative biliary drainage. Arch Surg 135(3):302–308CrossRefPubMed Cherqui D, Benoist S, Malassagne B et al (2000) Major liver resection for carcinoma in jaundiced patients without preoperative biliary drainage. Arch Surg 135(3):302–308CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Seyama Y, Kubota K, Sano K et al (2003) Long-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate. Ann Surg 238(1):73–83PubMedPubMedCentral Seyama Y, Kubota K, Sano K et al (2003) Long-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate. Ann Surg 238(1):73–83PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Hirano S, Kondo S, Tanaka E et al (2010) Outcome of surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a special reference to postoperative morbidity and mortality. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17(4):455–462. doi:10.1007/s00534-009-0208-1 CrossRefPubMed Hirano S, Kondo S, Tanaka E et al (2010) Outcome of surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a special reference to postoperative morbidity and mortality. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17(4):455–462. doi:10.​1007/​s00534-009-0208-1 CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kawashima H, Itoh A, Ohno E et al (2013) Preoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage in 164 consecutive patients with suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective study of efficacy and risk factors related to complications. Ann Surg 257(1):121–127. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318262b2e9 CrossRefPubMed Kawashima H, Itoh A, Ohno E et al (2013) Preoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage in 164 consecutive patients with suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective study of efficacy and risk factors related to complications. Ann Surg 257(1):121–127. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e318262b2e9​ CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kawakami H, Kuwatani M, Onodera M et al (2011) Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage is the most suitable preoperative biliary drainage method in the management of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol 46(2):242–248. doi:10.1007/s00535-010-0298-1 CrossRefPubMed Kawakami H, Kuwatani M, Onodera M et al (2011) Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage is the most suitable preoperative biliary drainage method in the management of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol 46(2):242–248. doi:10.​1007/​s00535-010-0298-1 CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
go back to reference Hirano S, Tanaka E, Tsuchikawa T et al (2014) Oncological benefit of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(8):533–540. doi:10.1002/jhbp.76 CrossRefPubMed Hirano S, Tanaka E, Tsuchikawa T et al (2014) Oncological benefit of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(8):533–540. doi:10.​1002/​jhbp.​76 CrossRefPubMed
25.
Metadata
Title
The type of preoperative biliary drainage predicts short-term outcome after major hepatectomy
Authors
Yoji Kishi
Kazuaki Shimada
Satoshi Nara
Minoru Esaki
Tomoo Kosuge
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1427-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 4/2016 Go to the issue