Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 4/2016

01-06-2016 | Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

Pancreaticojejunostomy is comparable to pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Authors: Stefano Crippa, Roberto Cirocchi, Justus Randolph, Stefano Partelli, Giulio Belfiori, Alessandra Piccioli, Amilcare Parisi, Massimo Falconi

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To perform an up-to-date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) and pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) in order to determine the safer anastomotic technique. Compared to existing meta-analysis, new RCTs were evaluated and subgroup analyses of different anastomotic techniques were carried out.

Methods

We conducted a bibliographic research using the National Library of Medicine’s PubMed database from January 1990 to July 2015 of RCTs. Only RCTs, in English, that compared PG versus all types of PJ were selected. Data were independently extracted by two authors. We performed a quantitative systematic review following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. A random-effect model was applied. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 and χ 2 tests. Primary outcomes were rate of overall and clinically significant pancreatic fistula (POPF).

Results

Ten RCTs were identified including 1629 patients, 826 undergoing PG and 803 undergoing PJ. RCTs showed significant heterogeneity regarding definitions of POPF, perioperative management, and characteristics of pancreatic gland. No significant differences were found in the rate of overall and clinically significant POPF, morbidity, mortality, reoperation, and intra-abdominal sepsis when PG was compared with all types PJ or when subgroup analysis (double-layer PG with or without anterior gastrotomy versus duct to mucosa PJ and single-layer PG versus single-layer end-to-end/end-to-side PJ) were analyzed.

Conclusions

PG is not superior to PJ in the prevention of POPF. Current RCTs have major methodological limitations with significant heterogeneity in regard to surgical techniques, definition of POPF/complications, and perioperative management.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P et al (2010) Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch Surg 145:634–40CrossRefPubMed Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P et al (2010) Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch Surg 145:634–40CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM Jr (2013) A prospectively validated clinical score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1–14CrossRefPubMed Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM Jr (2013) A prospectively validated clinical score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1–14CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Chen YJ, Lai EC, Lau WY, Chen XP (2014) Enteric reconstruction of pancreatic stump following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a review of the literature. Int J Surg S1743-9191(14):00159–9 Chen YJ, Lai EC, Lau WY, Chen XP (2014) Enteric reconstruction of pancreatic stump following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a review of the literature. Int J Surg S1743-9191(14):00159–9
4.
go back to reference Suc B, Msika S, Fingerhut A et al (2003) Temporary fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 237:57–65CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Suc B, Msika S, Fingerhut A et al (2003) Temporary fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 237:57–65CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Wang Q, He XR, Tian JH, Yang KH (2013) Pancreatic duct stents at pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. Dig Surg 30:415–24CrossRefPubMed Wang Q, He XR, Tian JH, Yang KH (2013) Pancreatic duct stents at pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. Dig Surg 30:415–24CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lai EC, Lau SH, Lau WY (2009) Measures to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: a comprehensive review. Arch Surg 144:1074–80CrossRefPubMed Lai EC, Lau SH, Lau WY (2009) Measures to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: a comprehensive review. Arch Surg 144:1074–80CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Fusai G, Davidson BR (2013) Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD008370PubMed Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Fusai G, Davidson BR (2013) Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD008370PubMed
8.
go back to reference Oussoultzoglou E, Bachellier P, Bigourdan JM et al (2004) Pancreaticogastrostomy decreased relaparotomy caused by pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with pancreaticojejunostomy. Arch Surg 139:327–35CrossRefPubMed Oussoultzoglou E, Bachellier P, Bigourdan JM et al (2004) Pancreaticogastrostomy decreased relaparotomy caused by pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with pancreaticojejunostomy. Arch Surg 139:327–35CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R et al (2013) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullarytumours: a multicenter randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 14:655–62CrossRefPubMed Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R et al (2013) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullarytumours: a multicenter randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 14:655–62CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Figueras J, Sabater L, Planellas P et al (2013) Randomized clinical trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on the rate and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 100:1597–605CrossRefPubMed Figueras J, Sabater L, Planellas P et al (2013) Randomized clinical trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on the rate and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 100:1597–605CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wellner UF, Sick O, Olschewski M et al (2012) Randomized controlled single-center trial comparing pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after partial pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1686–95CrossRefPubMed Wellner UF, Sick O, Olschewski M et al (2012) Randomized controlled single-center trial comparing pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after partial pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1686–95CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Chen Z, Song X, Yang D et al (2014) Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Eur J Surg Oncol 40:1177–1185CrossRefPubMed Chen Z, Song X, Yang D et al (2014) Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Eur J Surg Oncol 40:1177–1185CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Zhang X, Ma L, Gao X, et al. (2014) Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Today Sep 26 Zhang X, Ma L, Gao X, et al. (2014) Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Today Sep 26
14.
go back to reference Xiong JJ, Tan CL, Szatmary P et al (2014) Meta-analysis of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 101:1196–208CrossRefPubMed Xiong JJ, Tan CL, Szatmary P et al (2014) Meta-analysis of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 101:1196–208CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Clerveus M, Morandeira-Rivas A, Picazo-Yeste J, Moreno-Sanz C (2014) Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Surg 18:1693–704CrossRefPubMed Clerveus M, Morandeira-Rivas A, Picazo-Yeste J, Moreno-Sanz C (2014) Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Surg 18:1693–704CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hallet J, Zih FS, Deobald RG, et al. (2014) The impact of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction on pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. HPB Jul 7 Hallet J, Zih FS, Deobald RG, et al. (2014) The impact of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction on pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. HPB Jul 7
17.
go back to reference Menahem B, Guittet L, Mulliri A, Alves A, Lubrano J (2014) Pancreaticogastrostomy is superior to pancreaticojejunostomy for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg Jun 27 Menahem B, Guittet L, Mulliri A, Alves A, Lubrano J (2014) Pancreaticogastrostomy is superior to pancreaticojejunostomy for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg Jun 27
18.
go back to reference Liu FB, Chen JM, Geng W, et al. (2014) Pancreaticogastrostomy is associated with significantly less pancreatic fistula than pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials. HPB Jun 3 Liu FB, Chen JM, Geng W, et al. (2014) Pancreaticogastrostomy is associated with significantly less pancreatic fistula than pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials. HPB Jun 3
19.
go back to reference Ma S, Li Q, Dai W, Pan F (2014) Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy. J Surg Res May 15 Ma S, Li Q, Dai W, Pan F (2014) Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy. J Surg Res May 15
20.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an International Study Group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an International Study Group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed
21.
22.
go back to reference El Nakeeb A, Hamdy E, Sultan AM et al (2014) Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study. HPB 16:713–22CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral El Nakeeb A, Hamdy E, Sultan AM et al (2014) Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study. HPB 16:713–22CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Grendar J, Ouellet JF, Sutherland F, et al. (2015) In search of the best reconstructive technique in the Whipple operation: pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy. Can J Surg Apr 1 Grendar J, Ouellet JF, Sutherland F, et al. (2015) In search of the best reconstructive technique in the Whipple operation: pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy. Can J Surg Apr 1
24.
go back to reference Keck T, Wellner UF, Bahra M, et al. (2015) Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy for reconstruction after pancreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): perioperative and long-term results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg Jul 1 Keck T, Wellner UF, Bahra M, et al. (2015) Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy for reconstruction after pancreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): perioperative and long-term results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg Jul 1
25.
26.
go back to reference Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP et al (2011) Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. BMJ 343:d4002CrossRefPubMed Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP et al (2011) Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. BMJ 343:d4002CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Ades AE, Higgins JPT (2005) The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models. Med Decis Mak 25:646–654CrossRef Ades AE, Higgins JPT (2005) The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models. Med Decis Mak 25:646–654CrossRef
28.
29.
go back to reference Fleiss JL, Gross AJ (1991) Meta-analysis in epidemiology, with special reference to studies of the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: a critique. J Clin Epidemiol 44:127–39CrossRefPubMed Fleiss JL, Gross AJ (1991) Meta-analysis in epidemiology, with special reference to studies of the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: a critique. J Clin Epidemiol 44:127–39CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Shuster JJ, Jones LS, Salmon DA (2007) Fixed vs random effects meta-analysis in rare event studies: the rosiglitazone link with myocardial infarction and cardiac death. Stat Med 26(24):4375–85CrossRefPubMed Shuster JJ, Jones LS, Salmon DA (2007) Fixed vs random effects meta-analysis in rare event studies: the rosiglitazone link with myocardial infarction and cardiac death. Stat Med 26(24):4375–85CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ (2009) A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. J R Stat SocSer A Stat Soc 172:137–159CrossRef Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ (2009) A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. J R Stat SocSer A Stat Soc 172:137–159CrossRef
32.
33.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–58CrossRefPubMed Higgins JPT, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–58CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Duffas JP, Suc B, Msika S et al (2005) A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 189:720–9CrossRefPubMed Duffas JP, Suc B, Msika S et al (2005) A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 189:720–9CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Fernández-Cruz L, Cosa R, Blanco L, López-Boado MA, Astudillo E (2008) Pancreatogastrostomy with gastric partition after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy versus conventional pancreatojejunostomy. Ann Surg 248:930–8CrossRefPubMed Fernández-Cruz L, Cosa R, Blanco L, López-Boado MA, Astudillo E (2008) Pancreatogastrostomy with gastric partition after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy versus conventional pancreatojejunostomy. Ann Surg 248:930–8CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E et al (2008) Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy results of a comparative study. Ann Surg 248:930–938CrossRef Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E et al (2008) Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy results of a comparative study. Ann Surg 248:930–938CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM et al (1995) A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 222:580–8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM et al (1995) A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 222:580–8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Pratt WB, Maithel SK, Vanounou T et al (2007) Clinical/economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula classification scheme. Ann Surg 245:443–51CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pratt WB, Maithel SK, Vanounou T et al (2007) Clinical/economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula classification scheme. Ann Surg 245:443–51CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Pancreaticojejunostomy is comparable to pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Authors
Stefano Crippa
Roberto Cirocchi
Justus Randolph
Stefano Partelli
Giulio Belfiori
Alessandra Piccioli
Amilcare Parisi
Massimo Falconi
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1418-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 4/2016 Go to the issue