Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 2/2019

Open Access 01-02-2019 | Original Article

Workplace bullying among employees in Germany: prevalence estimates and the role of the perpetrator

Authors: Stefanie Lange, Hermann Burr, Paul Maurice Conway, Uwe Rose

Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of workplace bullying in Germany while also taking the perpetrator and severity level (measured by frequency) into account and considering the role of gender, age and socio-economic status.

Methods

We used data from a large representative sample (N = 4143) of employees in Germany subject to social security contributions. Self-reported bullying was assessed for different combinations of perpetrators (co-workers, superiors) and according to severity, i.e., being exposed at all and to severe bullying (at least weekly).

Results

Prevalence estimates varied from 2.9% for severe bullying by co-workers to 17.1% for overall bullying (i.e., without distinguishing by perpetrator, less severe bullying also included). Unskilled workers reported more bullying by both perpetrators than academics/managers. We also observed an age trend for severe bullying by superiors (i.e., bossing), with younger employees being more affected from bossing than elder. No gender differences were detected.

Conclusions

The findings indicate that it is crucial to consider type of perpetrator and severity of the behaviors when examining the prevalence of workplace bullying. The way bullying is defined and operationalized strongly contributes to the prevalence estimates. Differences between subgroups and associations or cause–effect relationships should be analyzed with these variations in mind.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Einarsen S, Raknes B (1997) Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of men. Violence Vict 12(3):247–263CrossRef Einarsen S, Raknes B (1997) Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of men. Violence Vict 12(3):247–263CrossRef
go back to reference Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper C (2003) The concept of bullying at work: the European tradition. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper C (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: international perspectives in research and practice. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 3–30 Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper C (2003) The concept of bullying at work: the European tradition. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper C (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: international perspectives in research and practice. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 3–30
go back to reference Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (2011) The concept of bullying at work: the European tradition. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and harassment in the workplace: developments in theory, research, and practice, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 3–39 Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (2011) The concept of bullying at work: the European tradition. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and harassment in the workplace: developments in theory, research, and practice, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 3–39
go back to reference Goldthorpe JH (2000) On sociology: numbers, narratives, and the integration of research and theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford Goldthorpe JH (2000) On sociology: numbers, narratives, and the integration of research and theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
go back to reference Hershcovis MS, Barling J (2007) Towards a relational model of workplace aggression. In: Langan-Fox J, Cooper CL, Klimoski RJ (eds) Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: management challenges and symptoms. Edward Elgar, Northampton, pp 268–284 Hershcovis MS, Barling J (2007) Towards a relational model of workplace aggression. In: Langan-Fox J, Cooper CL, Klimoski RJ (eds) Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: management challenges and symptoms. Edward Elgar, Northampton, pp 268–284
go back to reference Krumpal I (2013) Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review. Qual Quant 47(4):2025–2047CrossRef Krumpal I (2013) Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review. Qual Quant 47(4):2025–2047CrossRef
go back to reference Kunkel-Razum K, Scholze-Stubenrecht W, Wermke M (2003) Deutsches Universalwörterbuch [German universal dictionary], vol 5. Dudenverlag, Mannheim Kunkel-Razum K, Scholze-Stubenrecht W, Wermke M (2003) Deutsches Universalwörterbuch [German universal dictionary], vol 5. Dudenverlag, Mannheim
go back to reference Lahelma E, Lallukka T, Laaksonen M, Saastamoinen P, Rahkonen O (2012) Workplace bullying and common mental disorders: a follow-up study. J Epidemiol Community Health 66(6):e3CrossRef Lahelma E, Lallukka T, Laaksonen M, Saastamoinen P, Rahkonen O (2012) Workplace bullying and common mental disorders: a follow-up study. J Epidemiol Community Health 66(6):e3CrossRef
go back to reference Landsbergis PA, Grzywacz JG, LaMontagne AD (2014) Work organization, job insecurity, and occupational health disparities. Am J Ind Med 57(5):495–515CrossRef Landsbergis PA, Grzywacz JG, LaMontagne AD (2014) Work organization, job insecurity, and occupational health disparities. Am J Ind Med 57(5):495–515CrossRef
go back to reference Leymann H (1996) The content and development of mobbing at work. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 5(2):165–184CrossRef Leymann H (1996) The content and development of mobbing at work. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 5(2):165–184CrossRef
go back to reference Meschkutat B, Stackelbeck M, Langenhoff G (2005) Der Mobbing-Report: eine Repräsentativstudie für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 6. Aufl. edn. Wirtschaftsverlag NW Verlag für neue Wissenschaft GmbH, Bremerhaven Meschkutat B, Stackelbeck M, Langenhoff G (2005) Der Mobbing-Report: eine Repräsentativstudie für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 6. Aufl. edn. Wirtschaftsverlag NW Verlag für neue Wissenschaft GmbH, Bremerhaven
go back to reference Moncada S et al (2010) Psychosocial work environment and its association with socioeconomic status. A comparison of Spain and Denmark. Scand J Public Health 38(3_suppl):137–148CrossRef Moncada S et al (2010) Psychosocial work environment and its association with socioeconomic status. A comparison of Spain and Denmark. Scand J Public Health 38(3_suppl):137–148CrossRef
go back to reference Niedhammer I, Sultan-Taïeb H, Chastang J-F, Vermeylen G, Parent-Thirion A (2012) Exposure to psychosocial work factors in 31 European countries. Occup Med 62(3):196–202CrossRef Niedhammer I, Sultan-Taïeb H, Chastang J-F, Vermeylen G, Parent-Thirion A (2012) Exposure to psychosocial work factors in 31 European countries. Occup Med 62(3):196–202CrossRef
go back to reference Nielsen M, Notelaers G, Einarsen S (2011) Measuring exposure to workplace bullying. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and harassment in the workplace: developments in theory, research, and practice, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 149–177 Nielsen M, Notelaers G, Einarsen S (2011) Measuring exposure to workplace bullying. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and harassment in the workplace: developments in theory, research, and practice, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 149–177
go back to reference O’Connell P, Calvert E, Watson D (2007) Bullying in the workplace: survey reports 2007. Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment O’Connell P, Calvert E, Watson D (2007) Bullying in the workplace: survey reports 2007. Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment
go back to reference Schat A, Frone M, Kevin Kelloway E (2006) Prevalence of workplace aggression in the U.S. Workforce: findings from a National Study Schat A, Frone M, Kevin Kelloway E (2006) Prevalence of workplace aggression in the U.S. Workforce: findings from a National Study
go back to reference Schroder H, Schiel S, Schulz S, Kleudgen M (2015) Mentale Gesundheit bei der Arbeit (S-MGA): Methodenbericht zur Repräsentativerhebung an Erwerbstätigen in Deutschland. Projekt F. 2., vol überarb. Aufl. ed. Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz, Dortmund/Berlin/Dresden Schroder H, Schiel S, Schulz S, Kleudgen M (2015) Mentale Gesundheit bei der Arbeit (S-MGA): Methodenbericht zur Repräsentativerhebung an Erwerbstätigen in Deutschland. Projekt F. 2., vol überarb. Aufl. ed. Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz, Dortmund/Berlin/Dresden
go back to reference Zapf D, Escartin J, Einarsen S, Hoel H, Vartia M (2011) Empirical findings on prevalence and risk groups of bullying in the workplace. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and harassment in the workplace: developments in theory, research, and practice, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 149–177 Zapf D, Escartin J, Einarsen S, Hoel H, Vartia M (2011) Empirical findings on prevalence and risk groups of bullying in the workplace. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and harassment in the workplace: developments in theory, research, and practice, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 149–177
go back to reference zur Mühlen L, Normann G, Greif S (2001) Stress and bullying in two organisations. Faculty of Psychology. University of Osnabrück zur Mühlen L, Normann G, Greif S (2001) Stress and bullying in two organisations. Faculty of Psychology. University of Osnabrück
Metadata
Title
Workplace bullying among employees in Germany: prevalence estimates and the role of the perpetrator
Authors
Stefanie Lange
Hermann Burr
Paul Maurice Conway
Uwe Rose
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0340-0131
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1246
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1366-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 2/2019 Go to the issue