Top

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

Published in:

01-02-2009 | Short Communication

Prevalence of workplace bullying and risk groups: a representative population study

Authors: Adriana Ortega, Annie Høgh, Jan Hyld Pejtersen, Ole Olsen

Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health | Issue 3/2009

Abstract

Objectives

To estimate the prevalence of bullying and to identify risk groups in a representative population sample.

Methods

The data for this study was taken from the second Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Study (DPWES). The sample consisted of 3,429 employees between 20 and 59-years. The response rate for the study was 60.4%.

Results

The study showed that 8.3% of the respondents had been bullied within the past year, 1.6% of the sample reported daily to weekly bullying. Co-workers (71.5%) and managers/supervisors (32.4%) were most often reported as perpetrators of bullying, but bullying from subordinates (6%) was also reported. We found significant differences in the prevalence of bullying for both occupational status and work process, a variable characterizing the employees main task in their job. Unskilled workers reported the highest prevalence of bullying, while managers/supervisors the lowest prevalence. People working with things (male-dominated occupations) and people working with clients/patients (female-dominated occupations) reported higher prevalence of bullying than people working with symbols or customers. No significant gender or age differences were found.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that types of work and gender ratio are risk factors in the onset of workplace bullying. Future studies should take into account the type of work and the gender ratio of the organization.

Agervold M, Mikkelsen EG (2004) Relationships between bullying, psychosocial work environment and individual stress reactions. Work Stress 8:336–351. doi:10.1080/02678370412331319794 CrossRef

Björkqvist K, Österman K, Hjelt-Bäck M (1994) Aggression among university employees. Aggress Behav 20:173–184. doi :10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:3 ≤ 173::AID-AB2480200304 ≥ 3.0.CO;2-DCrossRef

Cowie H, Jennifer D, Neto C, Angulo JC, Pereira B, Del Barrio C, et al. Sheehan, M.; Ramsey, S.; Patrick, J. (2000) Comparing the nature of workplace bullying in two European countries: Portugal and UK. Transcending boundaries: integrating people, processes and systems, Brisbane, 6-9-2000

Dansk fagkode (The Danish job classification) (1986) The Directorate of Labour, Copenhagen. på NFA

Dansk Branchekode (2003) DB03 Danish Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities 2003 (in danish). Danmarks Statistik (Statistics Denmark), Copenhagen 2002. på NFA

Einarsen S (1996) Bullying and harassment at work: epidemiological and psychosocial aspects. University of Bergen, Afhandlingen haves.

Einarsen S (2000) Harassment and bullying at work: a review of the Scandinavian approach. Aggress Violent Behav 5:379–401. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(98)00043-3 CrossRef

Einarsen S, Raknes BI (1997) Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of men. Violence Vict 12:247–263PubMed

Einarsen S, Skogstad A (1996) Bullying at work: epidemiological findings in public and private organizations. Eur Work Organ Psychol 5:185–201. doi:10.1080/13594329608414854 CrossRef

Einarsen S, Zapf D (2003) Individual antecedents of bullying: victims and perpetrators. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. international perspectives in research and practice.. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 165–184

Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (2003) The concept of bullying at work: the European tradition. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. international perspectives in research and practice. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 3–30.

Feveile H, Olsen O, Hogh A (2007) A randomized trial of mailed questionnaires versus telephone interviews: response patterns in a survey. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:27. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-7-27 PubMedCrossRef

Hoel H, Cooper CL (2000) Destructive conflict and bullying at work. University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester

Hoel H, Cooper CL, Faragher B (2001) The experience of bullying in Great Britain: the impact of organizational status. Eur Work Organ Psychol 10:443–465. doi:10.1080/13594320143000780 CrossRef

Hoel H, Einarsen S, Keashley L, Zapf D, Cooper CL (2003) Bullying at work. The way forward. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. International perspectives in research and practice. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 412–416

Hofstede G (1980) Cultures consequences: international differences in work related values. Sage, Newbury Park

Hofstede G (1991) Cultures and organzations: software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, London

Hogh A, Dofradottir A (2001) Coping with bullying in the workplace. Eur Work Organ Psycho 10:485–495. doi:10.1080/13594320143000825 CrossRef

Hubert AB, van Veldhoven M (2001) Risk sectors for undesirable behaviour and mobbing. Eur Work Organ Psychol 10:415–424. doi:10.1080/13594320143000799 CrossRef

Leymann H (1992) Vuxenmobbning på svenska arbetsplatser. Stockholm: Arbetarskyddsstyrelsen; Report No.: 1. kopi

Leymann H (1996) The content and development of mobbing at work. Eur Work Organ Psychol 5:165–184. doi:10.1080/13594329608414853 CrossRef

Mikkelsen EG, Einarsen S (2001) Bullying in Danish work-life: prevalence and health correlates. Eur Work Organ Psychol 10:393–413. doi:10.1080/13594320143000816 CrossRef

Moayed FA, Daraiseh N, Shell R, Salem S (2006) Workplace bullying: a systematic review of risk factors and outcomes. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 7:311–327. doi:10.1080/14639220500090604 CrossRef

Niedhammer I, David S, Degioanni S (2007) Economic activities and occupations at high risk for workplace bullying: results from a large-scale cross-sectional survey in the general working population in France. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 80:346–353. doi:10.1007/s00420-006-0139-y PubMedCrossRef

Niedl K (1996) Mobbing and well-being: economic and personnel development implications. Eur Work Organ Psychol 5:239–249. doi:10.1080/13594329608414857 CrossRef

Quine L (1999) Workplace bullying in NHS trust: staff questionnaire survey. BMJ 318:228–232PubMed

Rayner C, Hoel H (1997) A summary review of literature relating to workplace bullying. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 7(3):181–191CrossRef

Rayner C, Keashly L (2005) Bullying at work: a perspective from Britain and North America. In: Fox S, Spector PE Counterproductive work behavior. Investigations of actors and targets. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, pp 271–296

Rayner C, Hoel H, Cooper CL (2002) Workplace bullying. Taylor & Francis, London

Salin D (2001) Prevalence and forms of bullying among business professionals: a comparison of two different strategies for measuring bullying. Eur Work Organ Psychol 10:425–441. doi:10.1080/13594320143000771 CrossRef

Siemiatycki J, Campbell S, Richardson L, Aubert D (1984) Quality of response in different population groups in mail and telephone surveys. Am J Epidemiol 120:302–314PubMed

Thorsted BL (2007) Forskerbeskyttelse i CPR. Det 29. symposium i anvendt statistikÅrhus Universitet: Danmarks Statistik van der Zouwen, J. and de Leeuw, E. D. (1991) The relationship between mode of administration and quality of data in survey research. Bull Methodol Sociol 31:49–60

van der Zouwen J, de Leeuw ED (1991) The relationship between mode of administration and quality of data in survey research. Bull Methodol Sociol 31:49–60

Vartia M (1996) The sources of bullying—psychological work environment and organizational climate. Eur Work Organ Psychol 5:203–214. doi:10.1080/13594329608414855 CrossRef

Vartia M (2003) Workplace bullying—a study on the work environment, well-being and health. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health

Vartia M, Hyyti J (2002) Gender differences in workplace bullying among prison officers. Eur Work Organ Psychol 11(1):113–126. doi:10.1080/13594320143000870 CrossRef

Zapf D, Einarsen S (2005) Mobbing at work: escalated conflicts in organizations. In: Fox S, Spector PE Counterproductive work behavior. investigations of actors and targets. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, pp 237–270

Zapf D, Einarsen S, Hoel H, Vartia M (2003) Empirical findings on bullying in the workplace. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace international perspectives in research and practice, 1st edn edn. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 103–126

Title: Prevalence of workplace bullying and risk groups: a representative population study
Authors: Adriana Ortega
Annie Høgh
Jan Hyld Pejtersen
Ole Olsen
Publication date: 01-02-2009
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0340-0131
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1246
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0339-8

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Prevalence of workplace bullying and risk groups: a representative population study

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

Cancer mortality and oil production in the Amazon Region of Ecuador, 1990–2005

Job stress and depressive symptoms among Korean employees: the effects of culture on work

Popcorn lung and bronchiolitis obliterans: a critical appraisal

Exposure to organic solvents and cytogenetic damage in exfoliated cells of the buccal mucosa from shoe workers

Outdoor work and skin cancer incidence: a registry-based study in Bavaria

Psychosocial working conditions and self-reported health in a representative sample of wage-earners: a test of the different hypotheses of the Demand–Control–Support–Model