Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 9/2020

01-09-2020 | Retinal Detachment | Retinal Disorders

Preoperative factors to select vitrectomy or scleral buckling for retinal detachment in microincision vitrectomy era

Authors: Koichi Nishitsuka, Ryo Kawasaki, Keita Yamakiri, Takayuki Baba, Takashi Koto, Hidetoshi Yamashita, Taiji Sakamoto, Japan Retinal Detachment Registry Group

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 9/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To determine the preoperative factors associated with selecting scleral buckling (SB) or pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) to treat rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) in the era of microincision vitrectomy surgery.

Methods

A nationwide, multicenter, observational study in the Japan Retinal Detachment Registry was done. From February 2016 to March 2017, 3446 cases were registered, and 3219 among them were analyzed. The factors related to the patient or surgeon were selected; the surgeon’s factor included years of experience, number of cases registered, and current activity. The odds ratio (OR) for factors associated with SB or PPV was estimated by a mixed logistic regression model.

Results

SB was selected in 24.2% (779/3219), PPV was in 71.5% (2238/3219), and PPV+SB was in 6.3% (202/3219). Multivariate analysis showed that age [< 70 years old, OR 4.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.34–7.79, P < 0.001], visual acuity [1.0+ (OR 7.41, 95% CI 3.47–15.82, P < 0.001)], pseudo-phakia (OR 4.83, 95%CI 2.11-10.56, P < 0.001), retinal tear (OR 6.92, 95% CI 4.83–9.92, P < 0.001), breaks at/near the vitreous base (OR 8.07, 95% CI 3.50–18.62, P < 0.001), 90+° retinal tear (OR 108.24, 95% CI 7.44–1574.34, P < 0.001), and number of breaks 4+ (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.95–5.09, P < 0.001), were significantly associated with selecting PPV over SB. The surgeons’ activity defined as the number of cases experienced during the registry period was related to the selection of PPV (OR 3.83, 95% CI 2.11–6.93, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The choice of PPV for the RRD was associated not only with patients’ preoperative factors but also the surgeon’s activity. Active surgeons selected PPV more than SB.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Feltgen N, Weiss C, Wolf S (2007) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): recruitment list evaluation. Study report no. 2. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245:803–809CrossRefPubMed Feltgen N, Weiss C, Wolf S (2007) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): recruitment list evaluation. Study report no. 2. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245:803–809CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Feltgen N, Heimann H, Hoerauf H et al (2013) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR study): risk assessment of anatomical outcome. SPR study report no. 7. Acta Ophthalmol 91:282–287CrossRefPubMed Feltgen N, Heimann H, Hoerauf H et al (2013) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR study): risk assessment of anatomical outcome. SPR study report no. 7. Acta Ophthalmol 91:282–287CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Heussen N, Hilgers RD, Heimann H et al (2011) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR study): multiple-event analysis of risk factors for reoperations. SPR Study report no. 4. Acta Ophthalmol 89:622–628CrossRefPubMed Heussen N, Hilgers RD, Heimann H et al (2011) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR study): multiple-event analysis of risk factors for reoperations. SPR Study report no. 4. Acta Ophthalmol 89:622–628CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Heussen N, Feltgen N, Walter P et al (2011) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): predictive factors for functional outcome. Study report no. 6. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:1129–1136CrossRefPubMed Heussen N, Feltgen N, Walter P et al (2011) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): predictive factors for functional outcome. Study report no. 6. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:1129–1136CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Heimann H, Hellmich M, Bornfeld N (2001) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (SPR Study): design issues and implications. SPR Study report no. 1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239:567–574CrossRefPubMed Heimann H, Hellmich M, Bornfeld N (2001) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (SPR Study): design issues and implications. SPR Study report no. 1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239:567–574CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N et al (2007) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology 114:2142–2154CrossRefPubMed Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N et al (2007) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology 114:2142–2154CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lauer MS, D'Agostino RB Sr (2013) The randomized registry trial--the next disruptive technology in clinical research? N Engl J Med 369:1579–1581CrossRefPubMed Lauer MS, D'Agostino RB Sr (2013) The randomized registry trial--the next disruptive technology in clinical research? N Engl J Med 369:1579–1581CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI (2000) Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 342:1887–1892CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI (2000) Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 342:1887–1892CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Ho JD, Liou SW, Tsai CY et al (2009) Trends and outcomes of treatment for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a 9-year nationwide population-based study. Eye (Lond) 23:669–675CrossRef Ho JD, Liou SW, Tsai CY et al (2009) Trends and outcomes of treatment for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a 9-year nationwide population-based study. Eye (Lond) 23:669–675CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Park SJ, Cho SC, Choi NK et al (2017) Age, sex, and time-specific trends in surgical approaches for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a nationwide, population-based study using the national claim registry. Retina 37:2326–2333CrossRefPubMed Park SJ, Cho SC, Choi NK et al (2017) Age, sex, and time-specific trends in surgical approaches for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a nationwide, population-based study using the national claim registry. Retina 37:2326–2333CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jackson TL, Donachie PH, Sallam A et al (2014) United Kingdom National Ophthalmology Database study of vitreoretinal surgery: report 3, retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 121:643–648CrossRefPubMed Jackson TL, Donachie PH, Sallam A et al (2014) United Kingdom National Ophthalmology Database study of vitreoretinal surgery: report 3, retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 121:643–648CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sallam AB, Donachie PHJ, Yorston D et al (2018) Royal college of ophthalmologists' national database study of vitreoretinal surgery: Report 7, Intersurgeon variations in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment failure. Retina 38:334–342CrossRefPubMed Sallam AB, Donachie PHJ, Yorston D et al (2018) Royal college of ophthalmologists' national database study of vitreoretinal surgery: Report 7, Intersurgeon variations in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment failure. Retina 38:334–342CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Parke Ii DW, Lum F, Rich WL (2017) The IRIS(R) Registry: purpose and perspectives. Ophthalmologe 114(Suppl 1):1–6CrossRefPubMed Parke Ii DW, Lum F, Rich WL (2017) The IRIS(R) Registry: purpose and perspectives. Ophthalmologe 114(Suppl 1):1–6CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Adelman RA, Parnes AJ, Ducournau D, European Vitreo-Retinal Society Retinal Detachment Study G (2013) Strategy for the management of uncomplicated retinal detachments: the European vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report 1. Ophthalmology 120:1804–1808CrossRefPubMed Adelman RA, Parnes AJ, Ducournau D, European Vitreo-Retinal Society Retinal Detachment Study G (2013) Strategy for the management of uncomplicated retinal detachments: the European vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report 1. Ophthalmology 120:1804–1808CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Adelman RA, Parnes AJ, Sipperley JO, Ducournau D, European Vitreo-Retinal Society Retinal Detachment Study G (2013) Strategy for the management of complex retinal detachments: the European vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report 2. Ophthalmology 120:1809–1813CrossRefPubMed Adelman RA, Parnes AJ, Sipperley JO, Ducournau D, European Vitreo-Retinal Society Retinal Detachment Study G (2013) Strategy for the management of complex retinal detachments: the European vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report 2. Ophthalmology 120:1809–1813CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Michalewska Z, Ducournau D, Adelman RA, Group ERS (2014) How do vitrectomy parameters influence the results of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments repair? EVRS RD Study No. 3. Acta Ophthalmol 92:e416–e417CrossRefPubMed Michalewska Z, Ducournau D, Adelman RA, Group ERS (2014) How do vitrectomy parameters influence the results of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments repair? EVRS RD Study No. 3. Acta Ophthalmol 92:e416–e417CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Adelman RA, Parnes AJ, Michalewska Z, Ducournau D, European Vitreo-Retinal Society Retinal Detachment Study G (2014) Clinical variables associated with failure of retinal detachment repair: the European vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report number 4. Ophthalmology 121:1715–1719CrossRefPubMed Adelman RA, Parnes AJ, Michalewska Z, Ducournau D, European Vitreo-Retinal Society Retinal Detachment Study G (2014) Clinical variables associated with failure of retinal detachment repair: the European vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report number 4. Ophthalmology 121:1715–1719CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Wong CW, Wong WL, Yeo IY et al (2014) Trends and factors related to outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery in a large asian tertiary eye center. Retina 34:684–692CrossRefPubMed Wong CW, Wong WL, Yeo IY et al (2014) Trends and factors related to outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery in a large asian tertiary eye center. Retina 34:684–692CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Smretschnig E, Falkner-Radler CI, Sporl J et al (2017) Primary retinal detachment surgery: changes in treatment and outcome in an austrian tertiary eye center. Ophthalmologica 237:55–62CrossRefPubMed Smretschnig E, Falkner-Radler CI, Sporl J et al (2017) Primary retinal detachment surgery: changes in treatment and outcome in an austrian tertiary eye center. Ophthalmologica 237:55–62CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Reeves MG, Pershing S, Afshar AR (2018) Choice of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair method in US commercially insured and medicare advantage patients, 2003-2016. Am J Ophthalmol 196:82–90CrossRefPubMed Reeves MG, Pershing S, Afshar AR (2018) Choice of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair method in US commercially insured and medicare advantage patients, 2003-2016. Am J Ophthalmol 196:82–90CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Spitzer MS, Januschowski K (2015) Aging and age-related changes of the vitreous body. Ophthalmologe 112:552–558CrossRefPubMed Spitzer MS, Januschowski K (2015) Aging and age-related changes of the vitreous body. Ophthalmologe 112:552–558CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Goezinne F, La Heij EC, Berendschot TT et al (2010) Incidence of redetachment 6 months after scleral buckling surgery. Acta Ophthalmol 88:199–206CrossRefPubMed Goezinne F, La Heij EC, Berendschot TT et al (2010) Incidence of redetachment 6 months after scleral buckling surgery. Acta Ophthalmol 88:199–206CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Rootman DB, Luu S, Conti SM et al (2013) Predictors of treatment failure for pneumatic retinopexy. Can J Ophthalmol 48:549–552CrossRefPubMed Rootman DB, Luu S, Conti SM et al (2013) Predictors of treatment failure for pneumatic retinopexy. Can J Ophthalmol 48:549–552CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Wickham L, Ho-Yen GO, Bunce C et al (2011) Surgical failure following primary retinal detachment surgery by vitrectomy: risk factors and functional outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 95:1234–1238CrossRefPubMed Wickham L, Ho-Yen GO, Bunce C et al (2011) Surgical failure following primary retinal detachment surgery by vitrectomy: risk factors and functional outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 95:1234–1238CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Aaberg TM (1988) Management of anterior and posterior proliferative vitreoretinopathy. XLV. Edward Jackson memorial lecture. Am J Ophthalmol 106:519–532CrossRefPubMed Aaberg TM (1988) Management of anterior and posterior proliferative vitreoretinopathy. XLV. Edward Jackson memorial lecture. Am J Ophthalmol 106:519–532CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Sasaki K, Ideta H, Yonemoto J et al (1995) Epidemiologic characteristics of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Kumamoto, Japan. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 233:772–776CrossRefPubMed Sasaki K, Ideta H, Yonemoto J et al (1995) Epidemiologic characteristics of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Kumamoto, Japan. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 233:772–776CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Ung T, Comer MB, Ang AJ et al (2005) Clinical features and surgical management of retinal detachment secondary to round retinal holes. Eye (Lond) 19:665–669CrossRef Ung T, Comer MB, Ang AJ et al (2005) Clinical features and surgical management of retinal detachment secondary to round retinal holes. Eye (Lond) 19:665–669CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Chang S (2006) LXII Edward Jackson lecture: open angle glaucoma after vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 141:1033–1043CrossRefPubMed Chang S (2006) LXII Edward Jackson lecture: open angle glaucoma after vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 141:1033–1043CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Vail D, Pershing S, Reeves MG et al (2019) The relative impact of patient, physician, and geographic factors on variation in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment management. Ophthalmology 127:97–106CrossRefPubMed Vail D, Pershing S, Reeves MG et al (2019) The relative impact of patient, physician, and geographic factors on variation in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment management. Ophthalmology 127:97–106CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Ehrlich R, Ahmad N, Welch S et al (2011) Vitreoretinal fellow surgical outcome of small gauge pars plana vitrectomy for acute rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:1147–1152CrossRefPubMed Ehrlich R, Ahmad N, Welch S et al (2011) Vitreoretinal fellow surgical outcome of small gauge pars plana vitrectomy for acute rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:1147–1152CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Preoperative factors to select vitrectomy or scleral buckling for retinal detachment in microincision vitrectomy era
Authors
Koichi Nishitsuka
Ryo Kawasaki
Keita Yamakiri
Takayuki Baba
Takashi Koto
Hidetoshi Yamashita
Taiji Sakamoto
Japan Retinal Detachment Registry Group
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04744-2

Other articles of this Issue 9/2020

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 9/2020 Go to the issue