Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 8/2011

01-08-2011 | Retinal Disorders

Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): predictive factors for functional outcome. Study report no. 6

Authors: Nicole Heussen, Nicolas Feltgen, Peter Walter, Hans Hoerauf, Ralf-Dieter Hilgers, Heinrich Heimann, The SPR Study Group

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 8/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To identify risk factors associated with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 1 year after initial surgery following primary vitrectomy (PV) and scleral buckling surgery (SB) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Methods

Relating the final BCVA at the 1-year follow-up visit to pre- and intraoperative findings in the “randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial comparing scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy for repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment” (SPR Study) using multivariate statistical methods.

Results

In the phakic subtrial, final BCVA is associated with the number of breaks (p = 0.0259), duration of symptoms (p = 0.0476), baseline BCVA (p = 0.0002), retinal detachment central to major vessels arcades (p = 0.0088), total detachment (p = 0.0027), and chain formation of breaks (p = 0.0129). In the pseudophakic/aphakic subtrial, final BCVA is related to the number of retinal breaks (p = 0.0010), secondary cataract or central capsular fibrosis (p = 0.0141), intraoperative laser photocoagulation (p = 0.0373), and inferior detachment with breaks below the 4 and 8 o’clock positions (p = 0.0173).

Conclusion

Final BCVA is the most important outcome for patients undergoing RRD surgery. Our results demonstrate that the final BCVA is related to a higher preoperative number of breaks in both subtrials. Additional risk factors varied between phakic and pseudophakic subgroups.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Feltgen N, Weiss C, Wolf S, Ottenberg D, Heimann H (2007) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): recruitment list evaluation. Study report no. 2. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245:803–809PubMedCrossRef Feltgen N, Weiss C, Wolf S, Ottenberg D, Heimann H (2007) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): recruitment list evaluation. Study report no. 2. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245:803–809PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N, Hilgers RD, Foerster MH (2007) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology 114:2142–2154PubMedCrossRef Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N, Hilgers RD, Foerster MH (2007) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology 114:2142–2154PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Heimann H, Hellmich M, Bornfeld N, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Hilgers RD, Foerster MH (2001) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (SPR Study): design issues and implications. SPR Study report no. 1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239:567–574PubMedCrossRef Heimann H, Hellmich M, Bornfeld N, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Hilgers RD, Foerster MH (2001) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (SPR Study): design issues and implications. SPR Study report no. 1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239:567–574PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Arya AV, Emerson JW, Engelbert M, Hagedorn CL, Adelman RA (2006) Surgical management of pseudophakic retinal detachments: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 113:1724–1733PubMedCrossRef Arya AV, Emerson JW, Engelbert M, Hagedorn CL, Adelman RA (2006) Surgical management of pseudophakic retinal detachments: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 113:1724–1733PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference de Silva DJ, Kwan A, Bunce C, Bainbridge J (2008) Predicting visual outcome following retinectomy for retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol 92:954–958PubMedCrossRef de Silva DJ, Kwan A, Bunce C, Bainbridge J (2008) Predicting visual outcome following retinectomy for retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol 92:954–958PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pastor JC, Fernandez I, Rodriguez de la Rua E, Coco R, Sanabria-Ruiz Colmenares MR, Sánchez-Chicharro D, Martinho R, Ruiz Moreno JM, García Arumi J, Suárez de Figueroa M, Giraldo A, Manzanas L (2008) Surgical outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in phakic and pseudophakic patients: the Retina 1 Project–report 2. Br J Ophthalmol 92:378–382PubMedCrossRef Pastor JC, Fernandez I, Rodriguez de la Rua E, Coco R, Sanabria-Ruiz Colmenares MR, Sánchez-Chicharro D, Martinho R, Ruiz Moreno JM, García Arumi J, Suárez de Figueroa M, Giraldo A, Manzanas L (2008) Surgical outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in phakic and pseudophakic patients: the Retina 1 Project–report 2. Br J Ophthalmol 92:378–382PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sharma YR, Karunanithi S, Azad RV, Vohra R, Pal N, Singh DV, Chandra P (2005) Functional and anatomic outcome of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:293–297PubMedCrossRef Sharma YR, Karunanithi S, Azad RV, Vohra R, Pal N, Singh DV, Chandra P (2005) Functional and anatomic outcome of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:293–297PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ulm K, Schmoor C, Sauerbrei W, Kemmler G, Aydemir Ü, Müller B, Schumacher M (1989) Stategien zur Auswertung einer Therapiestudie mit der Überlebenszeit als Zielkriterium. Biometrie und Informatik in der Medizin und Biologie 20:171–205 Ulm K, Schmoor C, Sauerbrei W, Kemmler G, Aydemir Ü, Müller B, Schumacher M (1989) Stategien zur Auswertung einer Therapiestudie mit der Überlebenszeit als Zielkriterium. Biometrie und Informatik in der Medizin und Biologie 20:171–205
10.
go back to reference Ross WH, Stockl FA (2000) Visual recovery after retinal detachment. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 11:191–194PubMedCrossRef Ross WH, Stockl FA (2000) Visual recovery after retinal detachment. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 11:191–194PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Burton TC (1977) Preoperative factors influencing anatomic success rates following retinal detachment surgery. Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 83:OP499–OP505PubMed Burton TC (1977) Preoperative factors influencing anatomic success rates following retinal detachment surgery. Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 83:OP499–OP505PubMed
12.
go back to reference Burton TC (1982) Recovery of visual acuity after retinal detachment involving the macula. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 80:475–497PubMed Burton TC (1982) Recovery of visual acuity after retinal detachment involving the macula. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 80:475–497PubMed
13.
go back to reference Burton TC, Lambert RW Jr (1978) A predictive model for visual recovery following retinal detachment surgery. Ophthalmology 85:619–625PubMed Burton TC, Lambert RW Jr (1978) A predictive model for visual recovery following retinal detachment surgery. Ophthalmology 85:619–625PubMed
14.
go back to reference Friberg TR, Eller AW (1992) Prediction of visual recovery after scleral buckling of macula-off retinal detachments. Am J Ophthalmol 114:715–722PubMed Friberg TR, Eller AW (1992) Prediction of visual recovery after scleral buckling of macula-off retinal detachments. Am J Ophthalmol 114:715–722PubMed
15.
go back to reference Grizzard WS, Hilton GF, Hammer ME, Taren D (1994) A multivariate analysis of anatomic success of retinal detachments treated with scleral buckling. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232:1–7PubMedCrossRef Grizzard WS, Hilton GF, Hammer ME, Taren D (1994) A multivariate analysis of anatomic success of retinal detachments treated with scleral buckling. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232:1–7PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kaufman PL (1976) Prognosis of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. 2. Accounting for and predicting final visual acuity in surgically reattached cases. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 54:61–74CrossRef Kaufman PL (1976) Prognosis of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. 2. Accounting for and predicting final visual acuity in surgically reattached cases. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 54:61–74CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kusaka S, Toshino A, Ohashi Y, Sakaue E (1998) Long-term visual recovery after scleral buckling for macula-off retinal detachments. Jpn J Ophthalmol 42:218–222PubMedCrossRef Kusaka S, Toshino A, Ohashi Y, Sakaue E (1998) Long-term visual recovery after scleral buckling for macula-off retinal detachments. Jpn J Ophthalmol 42:218–222PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ranta P, Kivela T (2002) Functional and anatomic outcome of retinal detachment surgery in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology 109:1432–1440PubMedCrossRef Ranta P, Kivela T (2002) Functional and anatomic outcome of retinal detachment surgery in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology 109:1432–1440PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ross WH, Kozy DW (1998) Visual recovery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 105:2149–2153PubMedCrossRef Ross WH, Kozy DW (1998) Visual recovery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 105:2149–2153PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sharma T, Challa JK, Ravishankar KV, Murugesan R (1994) Scleral buckling for retinal detachment. Predictors for anatomic failure. Retina 14:338–343PubMedCrossRef Sharma T, Challa JK, Ravishankar KV, Murugesan R (1994) Scleral buckling for retinal detachment. Predictors for anatomic failure. Retina 14:338–343PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tani P, Robertson DM, Langworthy A (1981) Prognosis for central vision and anatomic reattachment in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with macula detached. Am J Ophthalmol 92:611–620PubMed Tani P, Robertson DM, Langworthy A (1981) Prognosis for central vision and anatomic reattachment in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with macula detached. Am J Ophthalmol 92:611–620PubMed
22.
go back to reference Michels R, Wilkinson C, Rice T (1990) Results of retinal reattachment surgery. In: Michels R, Wilkinson C, Rice T (eds) Retinal detachment. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 917-958 Michels R, Wilkinson C, Rice T (1990) Results of retinal reattachment surgery. In: Michels R, Wilkinson C, Rice T (eds) Retinal detachment. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 917-958
23.
go back to reference Ahmadieh H, Entezari M, Soheilian M, Azarmina M, Dehghan MH, Mashayekhi A, Sajjadi H (2000) Factors influencing anatomic and visual results in primary scleral buckling. Eur J Ophthalmol 10:153–159PubMed Ahmadieh H, Entezari M, Soheilian M, Azarmina M, Dehghan MH, Mashayekhi A, Sajjadi H (2000) Factors influencing anatomic and visual results in primary scleral buckling. Eur J Ophthalmol 10:153–159PubMed
24.
go back to reference Ahmadieh H, Moradian S, Faghihi H et al (2005) Anatomic and visual outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachment: six-month follow-up results of a single operation–report no. 1. Ophthalmology 112:1421–1429PubMedCrossRef Ahmadieh H, Moradian S, Faghihi H et al (2005) Anatomic and visual outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachment: six-month follow-up results of a single operation–report no. 1. Ophthalmology 112:1421–1429PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Liu F, Meyer CH, Mennel S, Hoerle S, Kroll P (2006) Visual recovery after scleral buckling surgery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmologica 220:174–180PubMedCrossRef Liu F, Meyer CH, Mennel S, Hoerle S, Kroll P (2006) Visual recovery after scleral buckling surgery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmologica 220:174–180PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Salicone A, Smiddy WE, Venkatraman A, Feuer W (2006) Visual recovery after scleral buckling procedure for retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 113:1734–1742PubMedCrossRef Salicone A, Smiddy WE, Venkatraman A, Feuer W (2006) Visual recovery after scleral buckling procedure for retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 113:1734–1742PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Tani P, Robertson DM, Langworthy A (1980) Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment without macular involvement treated with scleral buckling. Am J Ophthalmol 90:503–508PubMed Tani P, Robertson DM, Langworthy A (1980) Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment without macular involvement treated with scleral buckling. Am J Ophthalmol 90:503–508PubMed
28.
go back to reference Wilkinson CP (1981) Visual results following scleral buckling for retinal detachments sparing the macula. Retina 1:113–116PubMedCrossRef Wilkinson CP (1981) Visual results following scleral buckling for retinal detachments sparing the macula. Retina 1:113–116PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Mowatt L, Shun-Shin GA, Arora S, Price N (2005) Macula off retinal detachments. How long can they wait before it is too late? Eur J Ophthalmol 15:109–117PubMed Mowatt L, Shun-Shin GA, Arora S, Price N (2005) Macula off retinal detachments. How long can they wait before it is too late? Eur J Ophthalmol 15:109–117PubMed
Metadata
Title
Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): predictive factors for functional outcome. Study report no. 6
Authors
Nicole Heussen
Nicolas Feltgen
Peter Walter
Hans Hoerauf
Ralf-Dieter Hilgers
Heinrich Heimann
The SPR Study Group
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 8/2011
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-011-1619-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2011

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 8/2011 Go to the issue