Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 8/2019

01-08-2019 | Oral Cancer | Head & Neck

How we improve the transoral resection for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: the CO2 waveguide laser

Authors: G. Tirelli, F. Boscolo Nata, R. Bussani, A. Gatto, E. Quatela, S. Rigo, M. Piovesana

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 8/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The main aim of this study was to evaluate the CO2 waveguide laser (CO2 WGL) with flexible fiber (Lumenis, Santa Clara, CA) in the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers specifically focusing on the lateral thermal damage (LTD) induced by this instrument and therefore on the reliability of the analysis of frozen sections collected during margin mapping.

Methods

A total of 48 patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancers from T1 to T4a were prospectively enrolled in the study. We collected data about LTD, pathologic tumor and node stage (pTNM), surgical intervention, kind of reconstruction (no flap, local vs free flap), need for tracheotomy and time of removal, postoperative complications (such as bleeding, mucosal dehiscence, and fistula), need for feeding tube and time of removal.

Results

Mean LTD was 164.7 ± 92.4 μm. Comparing frozen section histology before and after formalin embedding we found 5 true positives, 170 true negatives, 4 false positives and 4 false negatives, with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 55.6%, 98%, 55.6%, 98%, and 96.1%, respectively.

Conclusion

CO2 WGL is a very manageable tool, which allows a precise cut. However, its high costs, the inability to re-use the fibers and its low coagulation capability must be considered.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Steiner W (1993) Results of curative laser microsurgery of laryngeal carcinomas. Am J Otolaryngol 14:116–121CrossRefPubMed Steiner W (1993) Results of curative laser microsurgery of laryngeal carcinomas. Am J Otolaryngol 14:116–121CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Black C, Marotti J, Zarovnaya E, Paydarfar J (2006) Clinical evaluation of frozen section margins in head and neck cancer resection. Cancer 15(107):2792–2800CrossRef Black C, Marotti J, Zarovnaya E, Paydarfar J (2006) Clinical evaluation of frozen section margins in head and neck cancer resection. Cancer 15(107):2792–2800CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kumar K, Shetty DC, Dua M (2012) Biopsy and tissue processing artifacts in oral mucosal tissues. Int J Head Neck Surg 3:92–98CrossRef Kumar K, Shetty DC, Dua M (2012) Biopsy and tissue processing artifacts in oral mucosal tissues. Int J Head Neck Surg 3:92–98CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Eversole LR (1997) Laser artifacts and diagnostic biopsy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 83:639–640CrossRefPubMed Eversole LR (1997) Laser artifacts and diagnostic biopsy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 83:639–640CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Azevedo AS, Monteiro LS, Ferreira F, Delgado ML, Garcês F, Carreira S, Martins M, Suarez-Quintanilla J (2016) In vitro histological evaluation of the surgical margins made by different laser wavelengths in tongue tissues. J Clin Exp Dent 8:e388–e396PubMedPubMedCentral Azevedo AS, Monteiro LS, Ferreira F, Delgado ML, Garcês F, Carreira S, Martins M, Suarez-Quintanilla J (2016) In vitro histological evaluation of the surgical margins made by different laser wavelengths in tongue tissues. J Clin Exp Dent 8:e388–e396PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Hanby DF, Gremillion G, Zieske AW, Loehn B, Whitworth R, Wolf T, Kakade AC, Walvekar RR (2011) Harmonic scalpel versus flexible CO2 laser for tongue resection: a histopathological analysis of thermal damage in human cadavers. World J Surg Oncol 1(9):83. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-9-83 CrossRef Hanby DF, Gremillion G, Zieske AW, Loehn B, Whitworth R, Wolf T, Kakade AC, Walvekar RR (2011) Harmonic scalpel versus flexible CO2 laser for tongue resection: a histopathological analysis of thermal damage in human cadavers. World J Surg Oncol 1(9):83. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​1477-7819-9-83 CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Liboon J, Funkhouser W, Terris DJ (1997) A comparison of mucosal incisions made by scalpel, CO2 laser, electrocautery, and constant-voltage electrocautery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116:379–385 (while it is reported to be 1000 μm with the new radiofrequency tools) CrossRefPubMed Liboon J, Funkhouser W, Terris DJ (1997) A comparison of mucosal incisions made by scalpel, CO2 laser, electrocautery, and constant-voltage electrocautery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116:379–385 (while it is reported to be 1000 μm with the new radiofrequency tools) CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Carlander J, Johansson K, Lindström S et al (2005) Comparison of experimental nerve injury caused by ultrasonically activated scalpel and electrosurgery. Br J Surg 92:772–777CrossRefPubMed Carlander J, Johansson K, Lindström S et al (2005) Comparison of experimental nerve injury caused by ultrasonically activated scalpel and electrosurgery. Br J Surg 92:772–777CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Steiner W, Ambrosch P (2000) Complications. In: Stuttgart (ed) Endoscopic laser surgery of the upper aerodigestive tract. Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 112–113 Steiner W, Ambrosch P (2000) Complications. In: Stuttgart (ed) Endoscopic laser surgery of the upper aerodigestive tract. Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 112–113
41.
go back to reference Vilaseca-González I, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Blanch-Alejandro JL, Moragas-Lluis M (2003) Complications in transoral CO2 laser surgery for carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx. Head Neck 25:382–388CrossRefPubMed Vilaseca-González I, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Blanch-Alejandro JL, Moragas-Lluis M (2003) Complications in transoral CO2 laser surgery for carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx. Head Neck 25:382–388CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Haughey BH, Hinni ML, Salassa JR, Hayden RE, Grant DG, Rich JT, Milov S, Lewis JS Jr, Krishna M (2011) Transoral laser microsurgery as primary treatment for advanced-stage oropharyngeal cancer: a United States multicenter study. Head Neck 33:1683–1694. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21669 CrossRefPubMed Haughey BH, Hinni ML, Salassa JR, Hayden RE, Grant DG, Rich JT, Milov S, Lewis JS Jr, Krishna M (2011) Transoral laser microsurgery as primary treatment for advanced-stage oropharyngeal cancer: a United States multicenter study. Head Neck 33:1683–1694. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​hed.​21669 CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Hinni ML, Lott DG (2015) Contemporary transoral surgery for primary head and neck cancer. Plural Publishing, San Diego Hinni ML, Lott DG (2015) Contemporary transoral surgery for primary head and neck cancer. Plural Publishing, San Diego
45.
go back to reference Sinha UK, Gallagher LA (2003) Effects of steel scalpel, ultrasonic scalpel, CO2 laser, and monopolar and bipolar electrosurgery on wound healing in guinea pig oral mucosa. Laryngoscope 113:228–236CrossRefPubMed Sinha UK, Gallagher LA (2003) Effects of steel scalpel, ultrasonic scalpel, CO2 laser, and monopolar and bipolar electrosurgery on wound healing in guinea pig oral mucosa. Laryngoscope 113:228–236CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
How we improve the transoral resection for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: the CO2 waveguide laser
Authors
G. Tirelli
F. Boscolo Nata
R. Bussani
A. Gatto
E. Quatela
S. Rigo
M. Piovesana
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05473-x

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 8/2019 Go to the issue