Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2019

01-07-2019 | Fertility | Review

Short- and long term outcomes after abdominal radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

Authors: Anastasia Prodromidou, Christos Iavazzo, Alexandros Fotiou, Victoria Psomiadou, Athanasios Douligeris, Georgios Vorgias, Nikolaos Kalinoglou

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Cervical cancer (CC) ranks 2nd for mortality among women of reproductive age in the United States. Abdominal radical trachelectomy (ART) is a fertility sparing approach that has been proposed in women with early stage CC who wish to preserve their fertility. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of RH vs ART for early stage CC.

Methods

A total of 5 electronic databases were searched for articles published up to December 2018. Prospective and retrospective trials reporting outcomes for women who underwent ART or RH for the management of early stages CC, were considered eligible for inclusion. Statistical meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software.

Results

A total of 5 studies which included 840 women who underwent ART or radical trachelectomy (RH) were included in the present meta-analysis. Among them, 324 underwent ART whereas the remaining 516 had RH. Despite the fact that ART was associated with significantly prolonged operative time compared to RH (840 patients MD 36.82 min, 95% CI 20.15–53.49, p < 0.001), neither 5-year OS nor 5-year DFS were different among the two groups (714 patients OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.53–3.62, p = 0.51 and 682 patients OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.52–2.25, p = 0.84, respectively).

Conclusions

ART is a more complex and time consuming technique, but equally safe compared to RH in terms of oncological outcomes for selected women with early stage CC and allows for more CC survivors of childbearing age to preserve their fertility.
Literature
8.
go back to reference Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716CrossRefPubMed Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Covens A, Shaw P, Murphy J, DePetrillo D, Lickrish G, Laframboise S, Rosen B (1999) Is radical trachelectomy a safe alternative to radical hysterectomy for patients with stage IA-B carcinoma of the cervix? Cancer 86(11):2273–2279CrossRefPubMed Covens A, Shaw P, Murphy J, DePetrillo D, Lickrish G, Laframboise S, Rosen B (1999) Is radical trachelectomy a safe alternative to radical hysterectomy for patients with stage IA-B carcinoma of the cervix? Cancer 86(11):2273–2279CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference van Gent MD, van den Haak LW, Gaarenstroom KN, Peters AA, van Poelgeest MI, Trimbos JB, de Kroon CD (2014) Nerve-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy versus nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in early-stage (FIGO IA2–IB) cervical cancer: a comparative study on feasibility and outcome. Int J Gynecol Cancer 24(4):735–743. https://doi.org/10.1097/igc.0000000000000114 CrossRefPubMed van Gent MD, van den Haak LW, Gaarenstroom KN, Peters AA, van Poelgeest MI, Trimbos JB, de Kroon CD (2014) Nerve-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy versus nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in early-stage (FIGO IA2–IB) cervical cancer: a comparative study on feasibility and outcome. Int J Gynecol Cancer 24(4):735–743. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​igc.​0000000000000114​ CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Dargent D (1994) Pregnancies following radical trachelectomy for invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 52:105 Dargent D (1994) Pregnancies following radical trachelectomy for invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 52:105
27.
go back to reference Pareja R, Rendon GJ, Vasquez M, Echeverri L, Sanz-Lomana CM, Ramirez PT (2015) Immediate radical trachelectomy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conservative surgery for patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer with tumors 2 cm or larger: a literature review and analysis of oncological and obstetrical outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 137(3):574–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.051 CrossRefPubMed Pareja R, Rendon GJ, Vasquez M, Echeverri L, Sanz-Lomana CM, Ramirez PT (2015) Immediate radical trachelectomy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conservative surgery for patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer with tumors 2 cm or larger: a literature review and analysis of oncological and obstetrical outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 137(3):574–580. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ygyno.​2015.​03.​051 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Short- and long term outcomes after abdominal radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
Authors
Anastasia Prodromidou
Christos Iavazzo
Alexandros Fotiou
Victoria Psomiadou
Athanasios Douligeris
Georgios Vorgias
Nikolaos Kalinoglou
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05176-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2019 Go to the issue