Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2019

Open Access 01-03-2019 | Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease | General Gynecology

Prolapse surgery versus vaginal pessary in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: which factors influence the choice of treatment?

Authors: Barbara Bodner-Adler, Klaus Bodner, Anna Stinglmeier, Oliver Kimberger, Ksenia Halpern, Heinz Koelbl, Wolfgang Umek

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To investigate which specific clinical factors influence patients’ choice of prolapse treatment.

Methods

This study includes a total of 510 cases with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) of stage II or higher requiring prolapse treatment. Patients were divided into surgery and pessary groups according to their own choice and treatment preference. Primary outcome of interest was to define potential clinical parameters, which contribute to surgical treatment decision.

Results

A total of 252/510 (49%) women decided for prolapse surgery and 258/510 (51%) cases were treated conservatively with vaginal pessary. Hypertension, COPD as well as polypharmacy were parameters, which were statistically significantly more common in the pessary group compared to the surgically managed cases (p <0.05). On the contrary, women undergoing prolapse surgery were significantly younger and showed more advanced POP-Q (pelvic organ prolapse quantification) stages (p < 0.05). Clinical factors, such as BMI (body mass index), parity, mode of delivery and postmenopausal status, did not differ between the two groups (p > 0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that advanced POP-Q stage (p < 0.001) as well as the absence of smoking (p < 0.001) were independent factors associated with surgical treatment decision.

Conclusion

Women, who favoured prolapse surgery, were younger and in significant better health condition (less hypertension and COPD), but showed a significantly higher POP-Q stage compared to women choosing pessary treatment. Our data indicate that women with higher POP-Q stage and non-smokers tended to decide for prolapse surgery. This information could help in clinical practice to guide patients for the best possible treatment decision and strengthen individual counselling.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rahn DD, Good MM, Roshanravan SM, Shi H, Schaffer JI, Singh RJ et al (2014) Effects of preoperative local estrogen in postmenopausal women with prolapse: a randomized trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(10):3728–3736CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rahn DD, Good MM, Roshanravan SM, Shi H, Schaffer JI, Singh RJ et al (2014) Effects of preoperative local estrogen in postmenopausal women with prolapse: a randomized trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(10):3728–3736CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Dietrich W, Elenskaia K, Obermayr A, Horvat R, Mayerhofer K, Umek W et al (2012) Relaxin and gonadal steroid receptors in uterosacral ligaments of women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23:495–500CrossRefPubMed Dietrich W, Elenskaia K, Obermayr A, Horvat R, Mayerhofer K, Umek W et al (2012) Relaxin and gonadal steroid receptors in uterosacral ligaments of women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23:495–500CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Swift S, Woodman P, O’Boyle A et al (2005) Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:795–806CrossRefPubMed Swift S, Woodman P, O’Boyle A et al (2005) Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:795–806CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89(4):501–506CrossRefPubMed Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89(4):501–506CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Heit M, Rosenquist Ch, Culligan P, Graham C, Murphy M, Shott S (2003) Predicting treatment choice for patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 101:1279–1284PubMed Heit M, Rosenquist Ch, Culligan P, Graham C, Murphy M, Shott S (2003) Predicting treatment choice for patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 101:1279–1284PubMed
6.
go back to reference Coolen AL, Troost S, Mol BW, Roovers JP, Bongers MY (2018) Primary treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: pessary use versus prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J 29:99–107CrossRefPubMed Coolen AL, Troost S, Mol BW, Roovers JP, Bongers MY (2018) Primary treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: pessary use versus prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J 29:99–107CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Abdool Z, Tharkar R, Sultan AH, Oliver RS (2011) Prospective evaluation of outcome of vaginal pessaries versus surgery in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 22:273–278CrossRefPubMed Abdool Z, Tharkar R, Sultan AH, Oliver RS (2011) Prospective evaluation of outcome of vaginal pessaries versus surgery in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 22:273–278CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lone F, Thakar R, Sultan AH (2015) One-year prospective comparison of vaginal pessaries and surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using validated ICIQ-VS and ICIQ-UI (SF) questionnaires. Int Urogyn J 26:1305–1312CrossRef Lone F, Thakar R, Sultan AH (2015) One-year prospective comparison of vaginal pessaries and surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using validated ICIQ-VS and ICIQ-UI (SF) questionnaires. Int Urogyn J 26:1305–1312CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Abrams P, Cardozoo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U (2003) The standardization of terminology in lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardization sub-committee of the International Incontinence Society. Urology 61:37–49CrossRefPubMed Abrams P, Cardozoo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U (2003) The standardization of terminology in lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardization sub-committee of the International Incontinence Society. Urology 61:37–49CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Laycock J (1995) Pelvic floor dysfunction. University of Bradford, Bradford Laycock J (1995) Pelvic floor dysfunction. University of Bradford, Bradford
11.
go back to reference Lamers BH, Broekman BM, Milani AL (2011) Pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse and health-related quality of life. A review. Int Urogynecol J 22:637–664CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lamers BH, Broekman BM, Milani AL (2011) Pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse and health-related quality of life. A review. Int Urogynecol J 22:637–664CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Wang Y, Yang J, Han J, Zhu F, Zhang K, Yao Y (2015) Factors influencing therapy decision in patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 50(2):112–115PubMed Wang Y, Yang J, Han J, Zhu F, Zhang K, Yao Y (2015) Factors influencing therapy decision in patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 50(2):112–115PubMed
Metadata
Title
Prolapse surgery versus vaginal pessary in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: which factors influence the choice of treatment?
Authors
Barbara Bodner-Adler
Klaus Bodner
Anna Stinglmeier
Oliver Kimberger
Ksenia Halpern
Heinz Koelbl
Wolfgang Umek
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05046-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2019 Go to the issue