Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2012

01-02-2012 | Gynecologic Oncology

Prognostic factors in stage IA–IIA cervical cancer patients treated surgically: does the waiting time to the operation affect survival?

Authors: Tomokazu Umezu, Kiyosumi Shibata, Hiroaki Kajiyama, Eiko Yamamoto, Mika Mizuno, Fumitaka Kikkawa

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to identify prognostic factors in patients with stage IA–IIA cervical cancer who had undergone radical surgery and clarify whether the waiting time to the operation affected the recurrence and survival outcome.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 117 patients who underwent surgical resection for stage IA–IIA cervical cancer. Patients were subdivided based on the waiting time from the initial visit to a gynecologist until surgery. Univariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with recurrence-free and overall survival.

Results

The mean time from the first visit to surgery was 48 days (range 20–92). Recurrence-free and overall survival rates were not affected by the waiting time to the operation. On univariate analysis, lymph node metastasis (p = 0.003) and lymph-vascular space invasion (p = 0.015) were prognostic predictors of progression-free survival, while the waiting time to the operation was not (p = 0.106). Lymph node metastasis (p = 0.007), lymph-vascular space invasion (p = 0.046), and the histological diagnosis (p = 0.027) were prognostic predictors of overall survival, but the waiting time to the operation was not (p = 0.653).

Conclusions

The waiting time to the operation from the initial visit to surgical intervention does not adversely affect the outcome of cervical cancer within the time frames analyzed in this study. Furthermore, surgery allows the status of the lymph nodes and lymph-vascular space invasion, dependent variables associated with survival, to be assessed accurately.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, Placa F, Milani R, Perego P, Favini G, Ferri L, Mangioni C (1997) Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib–IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 350:535–540PubMedCrossRef Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, Placa F, Milani R, Perego P, Favini G, Ferri L, Mangioni C (1997) Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib–IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 350:535–540PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kirwan JM, Tincello DG, Herod JJ, Frost O, Kingston RE (2002) Effect of delays in primary care referral on survival of women with epithelial ovarian cancer: retrospective audit. BMJ 324:148–151PubMedCrossRef Kirwan JM, Tincello DG, Herod JJ, Frost O, Kingston RE (2002) Effect of delays in primary care referral on survival of women with epithelial ovarian cancer: retrospective audit. BMJ 324:148–151PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Crawford SC, Davis JA, Siddiqui NA, de Caestecker L, Gillis CR, Hole D, Penney G (2002) The waiting time paradox: population based retrospective study of treatment delay and survival of women with endometrial cancer in Scotland. BMJ 325:196PubMedCrossRef Crawford SC, Davis JA, Siddiqui NA, de Caestecker L, Gillis CR, Hole D, Penney G (2002) The waiting time paradox: population based retrospective study of treatment delay and survival of women with endometrial cancer in Scotland. BMJ 325:196PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Welcome to the Department of Health. Cancer waiting targets: a Guide, 2005. Department of Health, National Health Service. Available at http://www.dh.gov.uk. Accessed 30 June 2007 Welcome to the Department of Health. Cancer waiting targets: a Guide, 2005. Department of Health, National Health Service. Available at http://​www.​dh.​gov.​uk. Accessed 30 June 2007
6.
go back to reference Christensen ED, Harvald T, Jendresen M, Aggestrup S, Petterson G (1997) The impact of delayed diagnosis of lung cancer on the stage at the time of operation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 12:880–884PubMedCrossRef Christensen ED, Harvald T, Jendresen M, Aggestrup S, Petterson G (1997) The impact of delayed diagnosis of lung cancer on the stage at the time of operation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 12:880–884PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Richards MA, Smith P, Ramirez AJ, Fentiman IS, Rubens RD (1999) The influence on survival of delay in the presentation and treatment of symptomatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer 79:858–864PubMedCrossRef Richards MA, Smith P, Ramirez AJ, Fentiman IS, Rubens RD (1999) The influence on survival of delay in the presentation and treatment of symptomatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer 79:858–864PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Porta M, Gallen M, Malats N, Planas J (1991) Influence of “diagnostic delay” upon cancer survival: an analysis of five tumour sites. J Epidemiol Community Health 45:225–230PubMedCrossRef Porta M, Gallen M, Malats N, Planas J (1991) Influence of “diagnostic delay” upon cancer survival: an analysis of five tumour sites. J Epidemiol Community Health 45:225–230PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sainsbury R, Johnston C, Haward B (1999) Effect on survival of delays in referral of patients with breast-cancer symptoms: a retrospective analysis. Lancet l 353:1132–1135CrossRef Sainsbury R, Johnston C, Haward B (1999) Effect on survival of delays in referral of patients with breast-cancer symptoms: a retrospective analysis. Lancet l 353:1132–1135CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Raptis DA, Fessas C, Belasyse-Smith P, Kurzawinski TR. Clinical presentation and waiting time targets do not affect prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer. Surgeon 8:239–246 Raptis DA, Fessas C, Belasyse-Smith P, Kurzawinski TR. Clinical presentation and waiting time targets do not affect prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer. Surgeon 8:239–246
11.
go back to reference Stec AA, Coons BJ, Chang SS, Cookson MS, Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr, Clark PE (2008) Waiting time from initial urological consultation to nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma––does it affect survival? J Urol 179:2152–2157PubMedCrossRef Stec AA, Coons BJ, Chang SS, Cookson MS, Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr, Clark PE (2008) Waiting time from initial urological consultation to nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma––does it affect survival? J Urol 179:2152–2157PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Viswanathan AN, Deavers MT, Jhingran A, Ramirez PT, Levenback C, Eifel PJ (2004) Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: outcome and patterns of recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 93:27–33PubMedCrossRef Viswanathan AN, Deavers MT, Jhingran A, Ramirez PT, Levenback C, Eifel PJ (2004) Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: outcome and patterns of recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 93:27–33PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Crowder S, Tuller E (2007) Small cell carcinoma of the female genital tract. Semin Oncol 34:57–63PubMedCrossRef Crowder S, Tuller E (2007) Small cell carcinoma of the female genital tract. Semin Oncol 34:57–63PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Chan JK, Loizzi V, Burger RA, Rutgers J, Monk BJ (2003) Prognostic factors in neuroendocrine small cell cervical carcinoma: a multivariate analysis. Cancer 97:568–574PubMedCrossRef Chan JK, Loizzi V, Burger RA, Rutgers J, Monk BJ (2003) Prognostic factors in neuroendocrine small cell cervical carcinoma: a multivariate analysis. Cancer 97:568–574PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prognostic factors in stage IA–IIA cervical cancer patients treated surgically: does the waiting time to the operation affect survival?
Authors
Tomokazu Umezu
Kiyosumi Shibata
Hiroaki Kajiyama
Eiko Yamamoto
Mika Mizuno
Fumitaka Kikkawa
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1966-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2012 Go to the issue