Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Dermatological Research 9/2020

01-11-2020 | Actinic Keratosis | Concise Communication

Combined daylight and conventional photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolaevulinic acid nanoemulsion (BF-200 ALA) for actinic keratosis of the face and scalp: a new and efficient approach

Authors: Rafael Salido-Vallejo, F. Jiménez-Nájar, G. Garnacho-Sucedo, A. Vélez

Published in: Archives of Dermatological Research | Issue 9/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Conventional photodynamic therapy (cPDT) using red light is considered one of the most effective therapy option for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). The main disadvantage of cPDT is the pain experienced by the patients during illumination. Daylight PDT (dPDT) represents an effective and painless alternative. It can be speculated that a combination of both regimes combines their benefits. To compare the combination of cPDT and dPDT (combPDT) to dPDT alone in terms of effectiveness and safety. The study was developed as a single-centre, intraindividual, retrospective study. Each patient received one dPDT and a combPDT session with BF-200 ALA. Primary effectiveness endpoints included the reduction in the number of basal AK, percentage of patients with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). Safety parameters evaluated were local skin response (LSR) and visual analogue scale (VAS). A total of 19 patients with 264 AK were evaluated 12 weeks after both PDT modalities. The area treated with combPDT showed a reduction in the number of AK lesions (82.7%) when compared to the dPDT-treated area (56.8%). Higher rates of CR (31.6% vs 15.8) and PR (63.2% vs 26.3%) were achieved in combPDT fields. Areas treated with combPDT showed enhanced local skin reactions (LSR) in comparison with dPDT-treated areas (6.4 vs.4.4, respectively). In combPDT-treated patients a moderate increase of the pain during illumination was observed when compared to dPDT (VAS: 3.4 vs 0.6). This study reports the first data set on the benefit of a direct combination of daylight and subsequent conventional red light illumination (combPDT) with BF-200 ALA. The combination approach achieved a significant increase in clearance rates of AK lesions, while pain was perceived as mild to moderate during red light illumination.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Patel G, Armstrong AW, Eisen DB (2014) Efficacy of photodynamic therapy vs other interventions in randomized clinical trials for the treatment of actinic keratoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol 150:1281–1288CrossRef Patel G, Armstrong AW, Eisen DB (2014) Efficacy of photodynamic therapy vs other interventions in randomized clinical trials for the treatment of actinic keratoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol 150:1281–1288CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Vegter S, Tolley K (2014) A network meta-analysis of the relative efficacy of treatments for actinic keratosis of the face or scalp in Europe. PLoS ONE 9(6):e96829CrossRef Vegter S, Tolley K (2014) A network meta-analysis of the relative efficacy of treatments for actinic keratosis of the face or scalp in Europe. PLoS ONE 9(6):e96829CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wiegell SR, Haedersdal M, Philipsen PA, Eriksen P, Enk CD, Wulf HC (2008) Continuous activation of PpIX by daylight is as effective as and less painful than conventional photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses; a randomized, controlled, single-blinded study. Br J Dermatol 158:740–746CrossRef Wiegell SR, Haedersdal M, Philipsen PA, Eriksen P, Enk CD, Wulf HC (2008) Continuous activation of PpIX by daylight is as effective as and less painful than conventional photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses; a randomized, controlled, single-blinded study. Br J Dermatol 158:740–746CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Neittaanmaki-Perttu N, Karppinen TT, Gronroos M, Tani TT, Polonen I, Snellman E (2014) Daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses: A randomized double-blinded non-sponsored prospective study comparing BF-200 aminolevulinic acid with methyl-5-aminolaevulinate. Br J Dermatol 171:1172–1180CrossRef Neittaanmaki-Perttu N, Karppinen TT, Gronroos M, Tani TT, Polonen I, Snellman E (2014) Daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses: A randomized double-blinded non-sponsored prospective study comparing BF-200 aminolevulinic acid with methyl-5-aminolaevulinate. Br J Dermatol 171:1172–1180CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zhao W, Guan M, Nong X, Li Q, Chen Z (2019) The safety and efficacy of daylight photodynamic therapy in the treatment of actinic keratoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Dermatol 58:159–166CrossRef Zhao W, Guan M, Nong X, Li Q, Chen Z (2019) The safety and efficacy of daylight photodynamic therapy in the treatment of actinic keratoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Dermatol 58:159–166CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mei X, Wang L, Zhang R, Zhong S (2019) Daylight versus conventional photodynamic therapy for the treatment of actinic keratosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 25:23–28CrossRef Mei X, Wang L, Zhang R, Zhong S (2019) Daylight versus conventional photodynamic therapy for the treatment of actinic keratosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 25:23–28CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Olsen EA, Abernethy ML, Kulp-Shorten C et al (1991) A double-blind, vehiclecontrolled study evaluating masoprocol cream in the treatment of actinic keratoses on the head and neck. J Am Acad Dermatol 24:738–743CrossRef Olsen EA, Abernethy ML, Kulp-Shorten C et al (1991) A double-blind, vehiclecontrolled study evaluating masoprocol cream in the treatment of actinic keratoses on the head and neck. J Am Acad Dermatol 24:738–743CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gilaberte Y, Aguilar M, Almagro M et al (2015) Spanish-Portuguese consensus statement on use of daylight-mediated photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate in the treatment of actinic keratosis. Actas Dermosifiliogr 106:623–631CrossRef Gilaberte Y, Aguilar M, Almagro M et al (2015) Spanish-Portuguese consensus statement on use of daylight-mediated photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate in the treatment of actinic keratosis. Actas Dermosifiliogr 106:623–631CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Vignion-Dewalle AS, Baert G, Thecua E et al (2018) Comparison of 10 efficient protocols for photodynamic therapy of actinic keratosis: How relevant are effective light dose and local damage in predicting the complete response rate at 3 months? Lasers Surg Med 50:576–589CrossRef Vignion-Dewalle AS, Baert G, Thecua E et al (2018) Comparison of 10 efficient protocols for photodynamic therapy of actinic keratosis: How relevant are effective light dose and local damage in predicting the complete response rate at 3 months? Lasers Surg Med 50:576–589CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dirschka T, Radny P, Dominicus R et al (2012) Photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results of a multicentre, randomized, observer-blind phase III study in comparison with a registered methyl-5-aminolaevulinate cream and placebo. Br J Dermatol 166:137–146CrossRef Dirschka T, Radny P, Dominicus R et al (2012) Photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results of a multicentre, randomized, observer-blind phase III study in comparison with a registered methyl-5-aminolaevulinate cream and placebo. Br J Dermatol 166:137–146CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Reinhold U, Dirschka T, Ostendorf R et al (2016) A randomized, double-blind, phase III, multicentre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BF-200 ALA (Ameluz((R))) vs. placebo in the field-directed treatment of mild-to-moderate actinic keratosis with photodynamic therapy (PDT) when using the BF-RhodoLED((R)) lamp. Br J Dermatol 175:696–705CrossRef Reinhold U, Dirschka T, Ostendorf R et al (2016) A randomized, double-blind, phase III, multicentre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BF-200 ALA (Ameluz((R))) vs. placebo in the field-directed treatment of mild-to-moderate actinic keratosis with photodynamic therapy (PDT) when using the BF-RhodoLED((R)) lamp. Br J Dermatol 175:696–705CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Szeimies RM, Radny P, Sebastian M et al (2010) Photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. Br J Dermatol 163:386–394CrossRef Szeimies RM, Radny P, Sebastian M et al (2010) Photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. Br J Dermatol 163:386–394CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Skov T, Stockfleth E, Szeimies RM, Berman B (2018) Efficacy Endpoints in Clinical Trials in Actinic Keratosis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 8:425–433CrossRef Skov T, Stockfleth E, Szeimies RM, Berman B (2018) Efficacy Endpoints in Clinical Trials in Actinic Keratosis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 8:425–433CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Reinhold U (2017) A review of BF-200 ALA for the photodynamic treatment of mild-to-moderate actinic keratosis. Future Oncol 13:2413–2428CrossRef Reinhold U (2017) A review of BF-200 ALA for the photodynamic treatment of mild-to-moderate actinic keratosis. Future Oncol 13:2413–2428CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Castano AP, Mroz P, Hamblin MR (2006) Photodynamic therapy and anti-tumour immunity. Nat Rev Cancer 6:535–545CrossRef Castano AP, Mroz P, Hamblin MR (2006) Photodynamic therapy and anti-tumour immunity. Nat Rev Cancer 6:535–545CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wiegell SR, Wulf HC, Szeimies RM et al (2012) Daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: an international consensus: international society for photodynamic therapy in dermatology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 26:673–679CrossRef Wiegell SR, Wulf HC, Szeimies RM et al (2012) Daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: an international consensus: international society for photodynamic therapy in dermatology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 26:673–679CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Yu X, Zheng H, Chan MTV, Wu WKK (2018) Immune consequences induced by photodynamic therapy in non-melanoma skin cancers: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25:20569–20574CrossRef Yu X, Zheng H, Chan MTV, Wu WKK (2018) Immune consequences induced by photodynamic therapy in non-melanoma skin cancers: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25:20569–20574CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Serra-Guillen C, Nagore E, Llombart B et al (2018) A 12-day course of imiquimod 5% for the treatment of actinic keratosis: effectiveness and local reactions. Actas Dermosifiliogr 109:248–253CrossRef Serra-Guillen C, Nagore E, Llombart B et al (2018) A 12-day course of imiquimod 5% for the treatment of actinic keratosis: effectiveness and local reactions. Actas Dermosifiliogr 109:248–253CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Combined daylight and conventional photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolaevulinic acid nanoemulsion (BF-200 ALA) for actinic keratosis of the face and scalp: a new and efficient approach
Authors
Rafael Salido-Vallejo
F. Jiménez-Nájar
G. Garnacho-Sucedo
A. Vélez
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Dermatological Research / Issue 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-3696
Electronic ISSN: 1432-069X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-019-02028-2

Other articles of this Issue 9/2020

Archives of Dermatological Research 9/2020 Go to the issue