Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nutrition 6/2020

Open Access 01-09-2020 | Obesity | Short Communication

Efficacy of an intermittent energy restriction diet in a primary care setting

Authors: R. Antoni, K. L. Johnston, C. Steele, D. Carter, M. D. Robertson, M. S. Capehorn

Published in: European Journal of Nutrition | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Intermittent energy restriction (IER) is a popular weight loss (WL) strategy; however, its efficacy in clinical practice remains unknown. The present study compared the effects of IER compared to continuous energy restriction (CER) on WL and cardiometabolic risk factors in primary care.

Methods

A (self-selected) cohort study was conducted at the Rotherham Institute for Obesity (RIO), a primary care-based weight management service. 197(24% male) obese patients volunteered to participate and selected their diet group. IER participants (n = 99) consumed ~ 2600 kJ for two days/week. CER participants (n = 98) restricted their diet by ~ 2100 kJ/day below estimated requirements. Both interventions were delivered alongside RIO standard care. Changes in anthropometry and cardiometabolic disease risk markers (fasting biochemistry and blood pressure) were assessed after a 6-month intervention period and then participants were followed up again 6 months later (month 12).

Results

27 IER patients (27%) and 39 CER patients (40%) completed the 6-month weight loss phase. Among completers, mean (SEM) WL was greater in the IER group at 6 months (5.4 ± 1.1% versus 2.8 ± 0.6%; p = 0.01), as were reductions in fat mass (p < 0.001) and improvements in systolic blood pressure (p < 0.001). Fasting insulin (p = 0.873) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.701) were reduced similarly in both groups. However, in the IER group, changes in anthropometry and blood pressure in the IER group had reverted to baseline by 12-month follow-up, whilst the CER group maintained weight loss but showed an increase in blood pressure.

Conclusions

Among completers, IER resulted in superior short-term changes in anthropometry and some cardiometabolic risk factors. However, rates of attrition and weight regain were higher compared with standard care, providing important insights in the implementations of IER within a “real-life” NHS setting.

Trial registration number

ISRCTN31465600.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Leiter LA, Fitchett DH, Gilbert RE et al (2011) Cardiometabolic risk in canada: a detailed analysis and position paper by the cardiometabolic risk working group. Can J Cardiol 27(2):e1–e33CrossRef Leiter LA, Fitchett DH, Gilbert RE et al (2011) Cardiometabolic risk in canada: a detailed analysis and position paper by the cardiometabolic risk working group. Can J Cardiol 27(2):e1–e33CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Antoni R, Johnston KL, Collins AL, Robertson MD (2016) Effects of intermittent fasting on glucose and lipid metabolism. Proc Nutr Soc 76(3):361–368CrossRef Antoni R, Johnston KL, Collins AL, Robertson MD (2016) Effects of intermittent fasting on glucose and lipid metabolism. Proc Nutr Soc 76(3):361–368CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Davis CS, Clarke RE, Coulter SN et al (2016) Intermittent energy restriction and weight loss: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Nutr 70(3):292–299CrossRef Davis CS, Clarke RE, Coulter SN et al (2016) Intermittent energy restriction and weight loss: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Nutr 70(3):292–299CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Antoni R, Johnston KL, Collins AL, Robertson MD (2018) Intermittent versus continuous energy restriction: differential effects on postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism following matched weight-loss in overweight/obese subjects. Br J Nutr 119(5):507–516CrossRef Antoni R, Johnston KL, Collins AL, Robertson MD (2018) Intermittent versus continuous energy restriction: differential effects on postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism following matched weight-loss in overweight/obese subjects. Br J Nutr 119(5):507–516CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Trepanowski JF, Kroeger CM, Barnosky A et al (2017) Effect of alternate-day fasting on weight loss, weight maintenance, and cardioprotection among metabolically healthy obese adults. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 117(7):930–938CrossRef Trepanowski JF, Kroeger CM, Barnosky A et al (2017) Effect of alternate-day fasting on weight loss, weight maintenance, and cardioprotection among metabolically healthy obese adults. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 117(7):930–938CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Capehorn M (2015) Organisation of obesity care. In: Haslam D, Finer N (eds) An expert guide to weight loss surgery for primary care. National Services for Health Improvement Capehorn M (2015) Organisation of obesity care. In: Haslam D, Finer N (eds) An expert guide to weight loss surgery for primary care. National Services for Health Improvement
8.
go back to reference Harris JA, Benedict FG (1918) A biometric study of human basal metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 4(12):370–373CrossRef Harris JA, Benedict FG (1918) A biometric study of human basal metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 4(12):370–373CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jennings A, Hughes CA, Kumaravel B et al (2014) Evaluation of a multidisciplinary Tier 3 weight management service for adults with morbid obesity, or obesity and comorbidities, based in primary care. Clin Obes 4(5):254–266CrossRef Jennings A, Hughes CA, Kumaravel B et al (2014) Evaluation of a multidisciplinary Tier 3 weight management service for adults with morbid obesity, or obesity and comorbidities, based in primary care. Clin Obes 4(5):254–266CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Efficacy of an intermittent energy restriction diet in a primary care setting
Authors
R. Antoni
K. L. Johnston
C. Steele
D. Carter
M. D. Robertson
M. S. Capehorn
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1436-6207
Electronic ISSN: 1436-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-019-02098-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

European Journal of Nutrition 6/2020 Go to the issue