Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology 4/2020

Open Access 01-04-2020 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Original Paper

Validation of simple measures of aortic distensibility based on standard 4-chamber cine CMR: a new approach for clinical studies

Authors: Lukas Stoiber, Niky Ghorbani, Marcus Kelm, Titus Kuehne, Nina Rank, Tomas Lapinskas, Christian Stehning, Burkert Pieske, Volkmar Falk, Rolf Gebker, Sebastian Kelle

Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Aortic distensibility (AD) represents a well-established parameter of aortic stiffness. It remains unclear, however, whether AD can be obtained with high reproducibility in standard 4-chamber cine CMR images of the descending aorta. This study investigated the intra- and inter-observer agreement of AD based on different angles of the aorta and provided a sample size calculation of AD for future trials.

Methods

Thirty-one patients underwent CMR. Angulation of the descending aorta was performed to obtain strictly transversal and orthogonal cross-sectional aortic areas. AD was obtained both area and diameter based.

Results

For area-based values, inter-observer agreement was highest for 4-chamber AD (ICC 0.97; 95% CI 0.93–99), followed by orthogonal AD (ICC 0.96; 95% CI 0.91–98) and transversal AD (ICC 0.93; 95% CI 0.80–97). For diameter-based values, agreement was also highest for 4-chamber AD (ICC 0.97; 95% CI 0.94–99), followed by orthogonal AD (ICC 0.96; 95% CI 0.92–98) and transversal AD (ICC 0.91; 95% CI 0.77–96). Bland–Altman plots confirmed a small variation among observers. Sample size calculation showed a sample size of 12 patients to detect a change in 4-chamber AD of 1 × 10−3 mmHg−1 with either the area or diameter approach.

Conclusion

AD measurements are highly reproducible and allow an accurate and rapid assessment of arterial compliance from standard 4-chamber cine CMR.

Graphic abstract

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
19.
go back to reference Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JCC et al (2002) Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 90:29–34CrossRef Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JCC et al (2002) Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 90:29–34CrossRef
21.
go back to reference O’Rourke MF, Nichols WW (2005) Aortic diameter, aortic stiffness, and wave reflection increase with age and isolated systolic hypertension. Hypertension 45:652–658CrossRef O’Rourke MF, Nichols WW (2005) Aortic diameter, aortic stiffness, and wave reflection increase with age and isolated systolic hypertension. Hypertension 45:652–658CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ge Y, Wang TJ (2012) Identifying novel biomarkers for cardiovascular disease risk prediction. J Intern Med 272:430–439CrossRef Ge Y, Wang TJ (2012) Identifying novel biomarkers for cardiovascular disease risk prediction. J Intern Med 272:430–439CrossRef
26.
go back to reference MacEira AM, Mohiaddin RH (2012) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in systemic hypertension. J. Cardiovasc. Magn, Reson, p 14 MacEira AM, Mohiaddin RH (2012) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in systemic hypertension. J. Cardiovasc. Magn, Reson, p 14
Metadata
Title
Validation of simple measures of aortic distensibility based on standard 4-chamber cine CMR: a new approach for clinical studies
Authors
Lukas Stoiber
Niky Ghorbani
Marcus Kelm
Titus Kuehne
Nina Rank
Tomas Lapinskas
Christian Stehning
Burkert Pieske
Volkmar Falk
Rolf Gebker
Sebastian Kelle
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Electronic ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01525-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Clinical Research in Cardiology 4/2020 Go to the issue