Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology 2/2018

01-08-2018 | Review

Current developments in cardiac rhythm management devices

Authors: Philipp Halbfass, Kai Sonne, Karin Nentwich, Elena Ene, Thomas Deneke

Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Special Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Endocardial pacing has experienced a tremendous evolution since the 1960s. A lot of challenges associated with pacemaker and ICD devices have already been successfully targeted. However, a relevant number of problems have not been solved to date. Not all patients with accepted indication for biventricular pacing have benefited from cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) despite extensive efforts to reduce the rate of non-responders. Current strategies to optimize lead position, multipolar left-ventricular (LV) pacing leads, new strategies to gain access to the left-ventricle (atrial transseptal or ventricular transseptal access) or alternative right-ventricular (septal, His bundle pacing) pacing sites, and “leadless” LV pacing have the potential to increase response to device-based heart-failure treatment. The opportunity of pacemaker and ICD remote monitoring led to relevant improvements in therapy management by timely detection of events requiring medical or invasive interventions (e.g., external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation, increasing effective biventricular pacing, catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardias, or changes in heart-failure medication). Two completely endocardial leadless “all-in-one” pacemaker systems recently became available. Besides these innovations, new “synergistic” therapy concepts combining catheter ablation and device therapy proved to affect clinical endpoints (e.g., ATAAC study and CASTLE-AF study).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pluijmert M, Lumens J, Potse M et al (2015) Computer modelling for better diagnosis and therapy of patients by cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 4:62–67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pluijmert M, Lumens J, Potse M et al (2015) Computer modelling for better diagnosis and therapy of patients by cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 4:62–67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Kerckhoffs RC, McCulloch AD, Omens JH, Mulligan LJ (2009) Effects of biventricular pacing and scar size in a computational model of the failing heart with left bundle branch block. Med Image Anal 13:362–369CrossRefPubMed Kerckhoffs RC, McCulloch AD, Omens JH, Mulligan LJ (2009) Effects of biventricular pacing and scar size in a computational model of the failing heart with left bundle branch block. Med Image Anal 13:362–369CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Niederer SA, Shetty AK, Plank G et al (2012) Biophysical modeling to simulate the response to multisite left ventricular stimulation using a quadripolar pacing lead. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 35:204–214CrossRefPubMed Niederer SA, Shetty AK, Plank G et al (2012) Biophysical modeling to simulate the response to multisite left ventricular stimulation using a quadripolar pacing lead. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 35:204–214CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Turakhia MP, Cao M, Fischer A et al (2016) Reduced mortality associated with quadripolar compared to bipolar left ventricular leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2:426–433CrossRefPubMed Turakhia MP, Cao M, Fischer A et al (2016) Reduced mortality associated with quadripolar compared to bipolar left ventricular leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2:426–433CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Behar JM, Jackson T, Hyde E et al (2016) Optimized left ventricular endocardial stimulation is superior to optimized epicardial stimulation in ischemic patients with poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a combined magnetic resonance imaging, electroanatomic contact mapping, and hemodynamic study to target endocardial lead placement. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2:799–809CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Behar JM, Jackson T, Hyde E et al (2016) Optimized left ventricular endocardial stimulation is superior to optimized epicardial stimulation in ischemic patients with poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a combined magnetic resonance imaging, electroanatomic contact mapping, and hemodynamic study to target endocardial lead placement. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2:799–809CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Sieniewicz BJ, Behar JM, Gould J et al (2018) Guidance for optimal site selection of a leadless LV endocardial electrode improves acute hemodynamic response and chronic remodeling. JACC Clin Electrophysiol (article in press) Sieniewicz BJ, Behar JM, Gould J et al (2018) Guidance for optimal site selection of a leadless LV endocardial electrode improves acute hemodynamic response and chronic remodeling. JACC Clin Electrophysiol (article in press)
8.
go back to reference Niazi I, Baker J II, Corbisiero R, Love C, Martin D, Sheppard R, Worley SJ, Varma N, Lee K, Tomassoni G (2017) MPP Investigators. Safety and efficacy of multipoint pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: the MultiPoint Pacing Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 3:1510–1518CrossRefPubMed Niazi I, Baker J II, Corbisiero R, Love C, Martin D, Sheppard R, Worley SJ, Varma N, Lee K, Tomassoni G (2017) MPP Investigators. Safety and efficacy of multipoint pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: the MultiPoint Pacing Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 3:1510–1518CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Vijayaraman P, Naperkowski A, Ellenbogen KA et al (2015) Electrophysiologic insights into site of atrioventricular block: lessons from permanent His bundle pacing. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 1:571–581CrossRefPubMed Vijayaraman P, Naperkowski A, Ellenbogen KA et al (2015) Electrophysiologic insights into site of atrioventricular block: lessons from permanent His bundle pacing. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 1:571–581CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Parthiban N, Esterman A, Mahajan R et al (2015) Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 65:2591–2600CrossRefPubMed Parthiban N, Esterman A, Mahajan R et al (2015) Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 65:2591–2600CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hindricks G, Taborsky M, Glikson M et al (2014) Implant-based multiparameter telemonitoring of patients with heart failure (IN-TIME): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 384:583–590CrossRefPubMed Hindricks G, Taborsky M, Glikson M et al (2014) Implant-based multiparameter telemonitoring of patients with heart failure (IN-TIME): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 384:583–590CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Varma N, Piccini JP, Snell J et al (2015) The relationship between level of adherence to automatic wireless remote monitoring and survival in pacemaker and defibrillator patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 65:2601–2610CrossRefPubMed Varma N, Piccini JP, Snell J et al (2015) The relationship between level of adherence to automatic wireless remote monitoring and survival in pacemaker and defibrillator patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 65:2601–2610CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Reddy VY, Exner DV, Cantillon DJ et al (2015) for the LEADLESS II Study Investigators. Percutaneous implantation of an entirely intracardiac leadless pacemaker. N Engl J Med 373:1125–1135CrossRefPubMed Reddy VY, Exner DV, Cantillon DJ et al (2015) for the LEADLESS II Study Investigators. Percutaneous implantation of an entirely intracardiac leadless pacemaker. N Engl J Med 373:1125–1135CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Reynolds D, Duray GZ, Omar R, For the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study Group, et al (2016) A leadless intracardiac transcatheter pacing system. N Engl J Med 374:533–541CrossRefPubMed Reynolds D, Duray GZ, Omar R, For the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study Group, et al (2016) A leadless intracardiac transcatheter pacing system. N Engl J Med 374:533–541CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Reddy VY, Miller MA, Neuzil P et al (2017) Cardiac resynchronization therapy with wireless left ventricular endocardial pacing: the SELECT-LV study. J Am Coll Cardiol 69:2119–2129CrossRefPubMed Reddy VY, Miller MA, Neuzil P et al (2017) Cardiac resynchronization therapy with wireless left ventricular endocardial pacing: the SELECT-LV study. J Am Coll Cardiol 69:2119–2129CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Marrouche NF, Brachmann J, Andresen D, Siebels J, Boersma L, Jordaens L, Merkely B, Pokushalov E, Sanders P, Proff J, Schunkert H, Christ H, Vogt J, Bänsch D (2018) Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with heart failure. N Engl J Med 378:417–427CrossRefPubMed Marrouche NF, Brachmann J, Andresen D, Siebels J, Boersma L, Jordaens L, Merkely B, Pokushalov E, Sanders P, Proff J, Schunkert H, Christ H, Vogt J, Bänsch D (2018) Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with heart failure. N Engl J Med 378:417–427CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Di Biase L, Mohanty P, Mohanty S, Santangeli P, Trivedi C, Lakkireddy D, Reddy M, Jais P, Themistoclakis S, Dello Russo A, Casella M, Pelargonio G, Narducci ML, Schweikert R, Neuzil P, Sanchez J, Horton R, Beheiry S, Hongo R, Hao S, Rossillo A, Forleo G, Tondo C, Burkhardt JD, Haissaguerre M, Natale A (2016) Ablation versus amiodarone for treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with congestive heart failure and an implanted device: results from the AATAC multicenter randomized trial. Circulation 133:1637–1644. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019406 CrossRefPubMed Di Biase L, Mohanty P, Mohanty S, Santangeli P, Trivedi C, Lakkireddy D, Reddy M, Jais P, Themistoclakis S, Dello Russo A, Casella M, Pelargonio G, Narducci ML, Schweikert R, Neuzil P, Sanchez J, Horton R, Beheiry S, Hongo R, Hao S, Rossillo A, Forleo G, Tondo C, Burkhardt JD, Haissaguerre M, Natale A (2016) Ablation versus amiodarone for treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with congestive heart failure and an implanted device: results from the AATAC multicenter randomized trial. Circulation 133:1637–1644. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1161/​CIRCULATIONAHA.​115.​019406 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Current developments in cardiac rhythm management devices
Authors
Philipp Halbfass
Kai Sonne
Karin Nentwich
Elena Ene
Thomas Deneke
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Issue Special Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Electronic ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1313-4

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2018

Clinical Research in Cardiology 2/2018 Go to the issue