Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology 1/2019

01-01-2019 | Original Paper

Heart Valve Disease Awareness Survey 2017: what did we achieve since 2015?

Authors: Luise Gaede, Lars Aarberge, George Brandon Bravo Bruinsma, Philip Macarthy, Francesco Musumeci, Pepe Zamorano, Helge Möllmann

Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims

The 2015 Heart Valve Disease Awareness Survey showed a low knowledge and awareness about heart valve disease in the general population despite its high prevalence and morbidity. The 2017 survey was conducted to re-evaluate concern and knowledge about heart valve disease after 2 years of rapidly increasing patient numbers presenting with heart valve disease.

Methods and results

A total of 12,820 people aged 60 years or older in 11 European countries took part in the survey. While the number of people concerned most about heart valve disease increased significantly (2015:1.7% vs. 2017:2.1%; p < 0.001), it is still very low compared to cancer (28.8%) or Alzheimer’s disease (20.9%). More people claim to be familiar with heart valve disease in general (2015: 17.1% vs. 2017: 20.0%; p < 0.001) and the majority claims to know of at least one therapy for heart valve disease (61.9%). Nevertheless, only 3.8% could correctly identify aortic stenosis (AS), which is significantly less than in 2015 (7.2%; p < 0.001). As before, the majority of the respondents claimed to rarely or never undergo a stethoscope check from their general practitioner (2015: 54.2% vs. 2017: 50.6%, p < 0.001); nevertheless, a positive trend can be seen. People wish heart valve disease to be part of regular checks by the general practitioners.

Conclusion

The general population’s knowledge of heart valve disease in general slightly increased over the last 2 years. However, detailed understanding of aortic stenosis and its treatment options is still low, as is the level of concern shown for heart valve disease. Nevertheless, the general population cites heart valve disease as a condition they wish to be checked for regularly.
Literature
9.
13.
go back to reference Möllmann H (2015) In-hospital outcome of transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AQUA Registry). Clin Res Cardiol 104:1934 Möllmann H (2015) In-hospital outcome of transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AQUA Registry). Clin Res Cardiol 104:1934
14.
go back to reference Gaede L, Di Bartolomeo R, Van Der Kley F et al (2016) Aortic valve stenosis: what do people know ? A heart valve disease awareness survey of over 8800 people aged 60 or over. EuroIntervention 12:883–889CrossRefPubMed Gaede L, Di Bartolomeo R, Van Der Kley F et al (2016) Aortic valve stenosis: what do people know ? A heart valve disease awareness survey of over 8800 people aged 60 or over. EuroIntervention 12:883–889CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Möllmann H, Bestehorn K, Bestehorn M et al (2016) In-hospital outcome of transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve stenosis—complete dataset of patients treated in 2013 in Germany. Clin Res Cardiol 105:553–559CrossRefPubMed Möllmann H, Bestehorn K, Bestehorn M et al (2016) In-hospital outcome of transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve stenosis—complete dataset of patients treated in 2013 in Germany. Clin Res Cardiol 105:553–559CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Heart Valve Disease Awareness Survey 2017: what did we achieve since 2015?
Authors
Luise Gaede
Lars Aarberge
George Brandon Bravo Bruinsma
Philip Macarthy
Francesco Musumeci
Pepe Zamorano
Helge Möllmann
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Electronic ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1312-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Clinical Research in Cardiology 1/2019 Go to the issue